Emotional experiences of service robots’ anthropomorphic appearance: a multimodal measurement method

References

• Appelhans, B.M., and L.J. Luecken. 2006. “Heart Rate Variability as an Index of Regulated Emotional Responding.” Review of General Psychology 10 (3): 229–240. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.10.3.229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailenson, J.N., E.D. Pontikakis, I.B. Mauss, J.J. Gross, M.E. Jabon, C.A.C. Hutcherson, C. Nass, and O. John. 2008. “Real-Time Classification of Evoked Emotions Using Facial Feature Tracking and Physiological Responses.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66 (5): 303–317. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari, U., T. Neben, K. Chang, and W.Y. Chua. 2017. “Effects of Interface Design Factors on Affective Responses and Quality Evaluations in Mobile Applications.” Computers in Human Behavior 72 (2): 525–534. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.044.
   Google Scholar
• Bill, M., C. Müller, W. Kraus, and S. Bieller. 2022. “Service Robots – Top Findings.” Paper presented at the Market Presentation World Robotics 2022 Extended Version, 1–52. https://ifr.org/downloads/press2018/2022_WR_extended_version.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M.M., and P.J. Lang. 1994. “Measuring Emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential.” Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 25 (1): 49–59. doi:10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., R.W. Proctor, Y. Ding, V.G. Duffy, Y. Zhang, and X. Zhang. 2022. “Is an Anthropomorphic App Icon More Attractive than a Non-Anthropomorphic One? A Case Study Using Multimodal Measurement.” International Journal of Mobile Communication 20 (4): 419–439. 10035579. doi:10.1504/IJMC.2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., Y. Ding, R.W. Proctor, V.G. Duffy, Y. Liu, and X. Zhang. 2021. “Detecting Users’ Usage Intentions for Websites Employing Deep Learning on Eye-Tracking Data.” Information Technology and Management 22 (4): 281–292. doi:10.1007/s10799-021-00336-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., Y. Zhang, Y. Ding, V.G. Duffy, and X. Zhang. 2021. “Is an Anthropomorphic App Icon More Attractive? Evidence from Neuroergonomomics.” Applied Ergonomics 97 (8): 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103545.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, L., and A.J. Broderick. 2007. “The Application of Physiological Observation Methods to Emotion Research.” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 10 (2): 199–216. doi:10.1108/13522750710740853.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, R.L., and J. Nixon. 2019. “Measuring Mental Workload Using Physiological Measures: A Systematic Review.” Applied Ergonomics 74 (8): 221–232. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.028.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, S., and J. Epps. 2013. “Automatic Classification of Eye Activity for Cognitive Load Measurement with Emotion Interference.” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 110 (2): 111–124. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.10.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, A.H., S. Trimi, and Y.J. Lo. 2022. “Emotion and Service Quality of Anthropomorphic Robots.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 177 (2): 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121550.
   Google Scholar
• Christmann, A., and S. Van Aelst. 2006. “Robust Estimation of Cronbach’s Alpha.” Journal of Multivariate Analysis 97 (7): 1660–1674. doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2005.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Social Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf, M.M.A., S. Ben Allouch, and J.A.G. M. van Dijk. 2019. “Why Would I Use This in My Home? A Model of Domestic Social Robot Acceptance.” Human–Computer Interaction 34 (2): 115–173. doi:10.1080/07370024.2017.1312406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Luca, Carlo J., L Donald Gilmore, Mikhail Kuznetsov, and Serge H. Roy. 2010. “Filtering the Surface EMG Signal: Movement Artifact and Baseline Noise Contamination.” Journal of Biomechanics 43 (8): 1573–1579. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, M., and X. Gu. 2021. “Information Acquisition, Emotion Experience and Behaviour Intention during Online Shopping: An Eye-Tracking Study.” Behaviour & Information Technology 40 (7): 635–645. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2020.1713890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmet, Pieter. 2003. “Measuring Emotion: Development and Application of an Instrument to Measure Emotional Responses to Products.” In Funology, M. Blythe and A. Monk, 111–123. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Deubel, H., and W.X. Schneider. 1996. “Saccade Target Selection and Object Recognition: Evidence for a Common Attentional Mechanism.” Vision Research 36 (12): 1827–1837. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(95)00294-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Stasi, L.L., A. Catena, J.J. Canas, S.L. Macknik, and S. Martinez-Conde. 2013. “Saccadic Velocity as an Arousal Index in Naturalistic Tasks.” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 37 (5): 968–975. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.03.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Yi, Yaqin Cao, Vincent G. Duffy, Yi Wang, and Xuefeng Zhang. 2020. “Measurement and Identification of Mental Workload during Simulated Computer Tasks with Multimodal Methods and Machine Learning.” Ergonomics 63 (7): 896–908. doi:10.1080/00140139.2020.1759699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, N., L.-Z. Liu, X.-J. Yu, L. Qingqing, and Y. Shih-Ching. 2019. “Classification of Multichannel Surface-Electromyography Signals Based on Convolutional Neural Networks.” Journal of Industrial Information Integration 15 (9): 201–206. doi:10.1016/j.jii.2018.09.001.
   Google Scholar
• Epley, N., A. Waytz, and J.T. Cacioppo. 2007. “On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism.” Psychological Review 114 (4): 864–886. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eventhal, H., and K. Scherer. 1987. “The Relationship of Emotion to Cognition: A Functional Approach to a Semantic Controversy.” Cognition and Emotion 1 (1): 3–28. doi:10.1080/02699938708408361.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, Francesco, Maria Paola Paladino, and Jolanda Jetten. 2016. “Blurring Human–Machine Distinctions: Anthropomorphic Appearance in Social Robots as a Threat to Human Distinctiveness.” International Journal of Social Robotics 8 (2): 287–302. doi:10.1007/s12369-016-0338-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong, T., I. Nourbakhsh, and K. Dautenhahn. 2003. “A Survey of Socially Interactive Robots.” Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42 (3): 1–56. doi:10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullagar, Hugh H.K., Sabrina Skorski, Rob Duffield, Daniel Hammes, Aaron J. Coutts, and Tim Meyer. 2015. “Sleep and Athletic Performance: The Effects of Sleep Loss on Exercise Performance, and Physiological and Cognitive Responses to Exercise.” Sports Medicine 45 (2): 161–186. doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0260-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, Y., Y. Ji, S. Jiang, X. Liu, Z. Ping, Y. Li, and Y. Liu. 2021. “Integrating Aesthetic and Emotional Preferences in Social Robot Design: An Affective Design Approach with Kansei Engineering and Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 83 (5): 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103128.
   Google Scholar
• Glas, D.F., T. Minato, C.T. Ishi, T. Kawahara, and H. Ishiguro. 2016. “ERICA: The ERATO Intelligent Conversational Android.” 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 22–29. New York: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745086.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, K., and D.M. Wegner. 2012. “Feeling Robots and Human Zombies: Mind Perception and the Uncanny Valley.” Cognition 125 (1): 125–130. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco, A., G. Valenza, L. Citi, and E.P. Scilingo. 2016. “Arousal and Valence Recognition of Affective Sounds Based on Electrodermal Activity.” IEEE Sensors Journal 17 (3): 716–725. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2016.2623677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J.J., and R.W. Levenson. 1993. “Emotional Suppression: Physiology, Self-Report, and Expressive Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64 (6): 970–986. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, F., Y. Cao, Y. Ding, W. Liu, and X. Zhang. 2015. “A Multimodal Measurement Method of Users’ Emotional Experiences Shopping Online.” Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 25 (5): 585–598. doi:10.1002/hfm.20577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, D. 2005. “Expanding the Aesthetic Possibilities for Humanoid Robots.” Paper presented at IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Tsukuba, IEEE, 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., J. Borchers, S. Boll, A.R.der. Pütten, and V. Wulf.  2021. “Otherware, How to Best Interact with Autonomous Systems.” Interactions 28 (1): 54–57. doi:10.1145/3436942.
   Google Scholar
• Heerink, M., B. Kröse, V. Evers, and B. Wielinga. 2010. “Assessing Acceptance of Assistive Social Agent Technology by Older Adults: The Almere Model.” International Journal of Social Robotics 2 (4): 361–375. doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, C C., and K F. MacDorman. 2017. “Measuring the Uncanny Valley Effect: Refinements to Indices for Perceived Humanness, Attractiveness, and Eeriness.” International Journal of Social Robotics 9 (1): 129–139. doi:10.1007/s12369-016-0380-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 2012. ISO 8373-2012: Robots and Robotic Devices – Vocabulary. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, P.W. 1998. “Human Factors for Pleasure in Product Use.” Applied Ergonomics 29 (1): 25–33. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(97)00022-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, A.W., and R. Murugesh. 2020. “Potential Eye Tracking Metrics and Indicators to Measure Cognitive Load in Human-Computer Interaction Research.” Journal of Scientific Research 64 (1): 168–175. doi:10.37398/JSR.2020.640137.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 1973. Attention and Effort, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ketron, S., and K. Naletelich. 2019. “Victim or Beggar? Anthropomorphic Messengers and the Savior Effect in Consumer Sustainability Behavior.” Journal of Business Research 96 (11): 73–84. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.004.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., and A.L. McGill. 2011. “Gaming with Mr. slot or Gaming the Slot Machine? power, Anthropomorphism, and Risk Perception.” Journal of Consumer Research 38 (1): 94–107. doi:10.1086/658148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüber, K., and L. Onnasch. 2022. “Appearance is Not Everything-Preferred Feature Combinations for Care Robots.” Computers in Human Behavior 128 (12): 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107128.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, H., and R. Swaminathan. 2022. “Time and Frequency Domain Analysis of APB Muscles Abduction in Adult Dominant Hand Using Surface Electromyography Signals.” 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), 1–5. Cham: IEEE. doi:10.1109/MeMeA54994.2022.9856551.
   Google Scholar
• Kuppens, P. 2008. “Individual Differences in the Relationship between Pleasure and Arousal.” Journal of Research in Personality 42 (4): 1053–1059. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakasuo, M., J. Palomäki, and N. Köbis. 2021. “Moral Uncanny Valley: A Robot’s Appearance Moderates How Its Decisions Are Judged.” International Journal of Social Robotics 13 (12): 1679–1688. doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00738-6.
   Google Scholar
• Laparra-Hernández, J., Medina, J. M. E., and Poveda N.C. R. 2009. “EMG and GSR Signals for Evaluating User’s Perception of Different Types of Ceramic Flooring.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39 (2): 326–332. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laschke, M., R. Neuhaus, J. Dörrenbächer, M. Hassenzahl, V. Wulf, A.R.der. Pütten, J. Borchers, and S. Boll. 2020. “Otherware Needs Otherness: Understanding and Designing Artificial Counterparts.” Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on HumanComputer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society (NordiCHI ’20), October 25–29, 2020, Tallinn, Estonia. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3419249.3420079.
   Google Scholar
• LeDoux, J.E., and S.G. Hofmann. 2018. “The Subjective Experience of Emotion: A Fearful View.” Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 19 (11): 67–72. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.09.011.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, P., K. Kaur, A. Sharma, K. Shah, R. Huseby, J. Bhavsar, and Y. Zhang. 2020. “Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Improves Emotional and Physical Health and Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.” Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback 45 (3): 109–129. doi:10.1007/s10484-020-09466-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, K., J. Zhang, L. Wang, M. Zhang, J. Li, and S. Bao. 2020. “A Review of the Key Technologies for sEMG-Based Human-Robot Interaction Systems.” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 62 (9): 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102074.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M., F. Guo, Z. Ren, and V.G. Duffy. 2022. “A Visual and Neural Evaluation of the Affective Impression on Humanoid Robot Appearances in Free Viewing.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 88 (3): 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103159.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., G. Walters, J. Packer, and N. Scott. 2018. “A Comparative Analysis of Self-Report Anpsychophysiological Measures of Emotion in the Context of Tourism Advertising.” Journal of Travel Research 57 (8): 1078–1092. doi:10.1177/0047287517733555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Z. Wang, C. Gao, and L Shi. 2017. “Reasoning Human Emotional Responses from Large-Scale Social and Public Media.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 310 (10): 182–193. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2017.03.031.
   Google Scholar
• Lien, M.-C., R.W. Proctor, and J. Hinkson. 2020. “Emotion-Induced Attentional Bias: Does It Modulate the Spatial Simon Effect?.” Cognition & Emotion 34 (8): 1591–1607. doi:10.1080/02699931.2020.1785847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L., M.Q. Yang, C. Zhang, and L. Liu. 2013. “The Product Emotion and Key Technology for Emotional Measurement.” Journal of Graphics 34 (1): 122–127.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W., Y. Cao, and W.R. Proctor. 2022. “The Roles of Visual Complexity and Order in First Impressions of Webpages: An ERP Study of Webpage Rapid Rvaluation.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 38 (14): 1345–1358. doi:10.1080/10447318.2021.2002044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., F. Li, L.H. Tang, Z. Lan, J. Cui, O. Sourina, and C.-H. Chen. 2019. “Detection of Humanoid Robot Design Preferences Using EEG and Eye Tracker.” 2019 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW), 219–224. Kyoto: IEEE. doi:10.1109/CW.2019.00044.
   Google Scholar
• Łupkowski, P., and M. Gierszewska. 2019. “Attitude towards Humanoid Robots and the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis.” Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 44 (1): 101–119. doi:10.2478/fcds-2019-0006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Fujun, Fanghao Song, Yan Liu, and Jiahui Niu. 2020. “sEMG-Based Neural Network Prediction Model Selection of Gesture Fatigue and Dataset Optimization.” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2020 (10): 8853314–8853317. doi:10.1155/2020/8853314.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacDorman, K.F., and D. Chattopadhyay. 2016. “Reducing Consistency in Human Realism Increases the Uncanny Valley Effect; Increasing Category Uncertainty Does Not.” Cognition 146: 190–205. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mara, M., M. Appel, and T. Gnambs. 2022. “Human-like Robots and the Uncanny Valley: A Meta-Analysis of User Responses Based on the Godspeed Scales.” Zeitschrift Für Psychologie 230 (1): 1–34. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maria, E., L. Matthias, and H. Sten. 2019. “Emotion Recognition from Physiological Signal Analysis: A Review.” Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 343 (4): 35–55. doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2019.04.009.
   Google Scholar
• Mathur, M.B., and D.B. Reichling. 2016. “Navigating a Social World with Robot Partners: A Quantitative Cartography of the Uncanny Valley.” Cognition 146 (9): 22–32. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mathur, M.B., D.B. Reichling, F. Lunardini, A. Geminiani, A. Antonietti, P.A.M. Ruijten, C.A. Levitan, G. Nave, D. Manfredi, B.B. Symons, A. Szuts, and B. Aczel. 2020. “Uncanny but Not Confusing: Multisite Study of Perceptual Category Confusion in the Uncanny Valley.” Computers in Human Behavior 103 (2): 21–30. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.029.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A., and J.A. Russell. 1974. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mori, M., K.F. MacDorman, and N. Kageki. 2012. “The Uncanny Valley [from the Field].” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 19 (2): 98–100. doi:10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshagen, M., and M.T. Thielsch. 2010. “Facets of Visual Aesthetics.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68 (70): 689–709. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.05.006.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, K.L., and C. Rauh. 2017. “The Influence of the Avatar on Online Perceptions of Anthropomorphism, Androgyny, Credibility, Homophily, and Attraction.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (1): 153–178. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00308.x.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, E., X. Zhao, D. Ullman, and B.F. Malle. 2018. “What is Human-like? Decomposing Robots’ Human-like Appearance Using the Anthropomorphic roBOT (ABOT) Database.” Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 105–113. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/3171221.3171268.
   Google Scholar
• Pourmohammadi, S., and A. Maleki. 2020. “Stress Detection Using ECG and EMG Signals: A Comprehensive Study.” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 193 (3): 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105482.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, A., and W.A. Rogers. 2015. “Why Some Humanoid Faces Are Perceived More Positively than Others: effects of Human-Likeness and Task.” International Journal of Social Robotics 7 (2): 309–331. doi:10.1007/s12369-014-0269-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raez, M.B.I., M.S. Hussain, and F. Mohd-Yasin. 2006. “Techniques of EMG Signal Analysis: detection, Processing, Classification and Applications.” Biological Procedures Online 8 (1): 11–35. doi:10.1251/bpo115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rattel, J.A., I.B. Mauss, M. Liedlgruber, and F.H. Wihelm. 2020. “Sex Differences in Emotional Concordance.” Biological Psychology 151 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107845.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. 1998. “Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research.” Psychological Bulletin 124 (3): 372–422. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., J. Hancock, and X. Liu. 2020. “Social Robots are Like Real People: First Impressions, Attributes, and Stereotyping of Social Robots.” Technology, Mind, and Behavior 1 (1): 1–37. doi:10.1037/tmb0000018.
   Google Scholar
• Roesler, E., D. Manzey, and L. Onnasch. 2021. “A Meta-Analysis on the Effectiveness of Anthropomorphism in Human-Robot Interaction.” Science Robotics 6 (58): 1–10. doi:10.1126/scirobotics.abj5425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roesler, E., Lara Naendrup-Poell, D. Manzey, and L. Onnasch. 2022. “ Why Context Matters: The Influence of Application Domain on Preferred Degree of Anthropomorphism and Gender Attribution in Human–Robot Interaction.” International Journal of Social Robotics 14 (1): 1155–1166. doi:10.1007/s12369-021-00860-z.
   Google Scholar
• Seyama, J., and R.S. Nagayama. 2007. “The Uncanny Valley: Effect of Realism on the Impression of Artificial Human Faces.” Presence 16 (4): 337–351. doi:10.1162/pres.16.4.337.
   Google Scholar
• Song, Y., and Y. Luximon. 2021. “The Face of Trust: The Effect of Robot Face Ratio on Consumer Preference.” Computers in Human Behavior 116 (3): 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106620.
   Google Scholar
• Strait, M., H.L. Urry, and P. Muentener. 2019. “Children’s Responding to Humanlike Agents Reflects an Uncanny Valley.” 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 506–515. Daegu: IEEE. doi:10.1109/HRI.2019.8673088.
   Google Scholar
• Stroessner, S.J., and J. Benitez. 2019. “The Social Perception of Humanoid and Non-Humanoid Robots: Effects of Gendered and Machinelike Features.” International Journal of Social Robotics 11 (2): 305–315. doi:10.1007/s12369-018-0502-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takayanagi, K., T. Kirita, and T. Shibata. 2014. “Comparison of Verbal and Emotional Responses of Elderly People with Mild/Moderate Dementia and Those with Severe Dementia in Responses to Seal Robot, Paro.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 6 (9): 257–262. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thayer, Julian F., Fredrik Ahs, Mats Fredrikson, John J. Sollers, and Tor D. Wager. 2012. “A Meta-Analysis of Heart Rate Variability and Neuroimaging Studies: Implications for Heart Rate Variability as a Marker of Stress and Health.” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 36 (2): 747–756. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Boxtel, A. 2010. “Facial EMG as a Tool for Inferring Affective States.” Proceedings of Measuring Behavior 2 (1): 104–108.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., M.G. Morris, G.B. Davis, and F.D. Davis. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly 27 (3): 425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., S.O. Lilienfeld, and P. Rochat. 2015. “The Uncanny Valley: Existence and Explanations.” Review of General Psychology 19 (4): 393–407. doi:10.1037/gpr0000056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, R D., and P H. Marsden. 2004. “Affective Computing: Problems, Reactions and Intentions.” Interacting with Computers 16 (4): 707–713. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2004.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., L.A. Clark, and A. Tellegen. 1988. “Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (6): 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, F., and L.Y. Xu. 2020. “Artificial Intelligence and Anthropomorphism.” Journal of Northwest Normal University (Social Science) 57 (5): 52–60. doi:10.16783/j.cnki.nwnus.2020.05.007.
   Google Scholar
• Zamani, H., A. Abas, and M. Amin. 2016. “Eye Tracking Application on Emotion Analysis for Marketing Strategy.” Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC) 8 (11): 87–91.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., S. Li, J.-Y. Zhang, F. Du, Y. Qi, and X. Liu. 2020. “A Literature Review of the Research on the Uncanny Valley.” International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 255–268. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49788-0_19.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, L., G. Mao, H. Su, Z. Zhou, W. Li, X. Lü, and Z. Wang. 2021. “A Wearable, High-Resolution, and Wireless System for Multichannel Surface Electromyography Detection.” IEEE Sensors Journal 21 (8): 9937–9948. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2021.3058987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar