Human Rights and Broken Cisterns: Counterpublic Christianity and Rights-based Discourse in Contemporary England

References

• Asad, Talal. 2000. What Do Human Rights Do? An Anthropological Enquiry. Theory and Event, 4:4. https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/v004/4.4asad.html
   Google Scholar
• Asad, Talal.. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bomhoff, Jacco. 2013. Balancing Constitutional Rights: The Origins and Meanings of Postwar Legal Discourse. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Wendy. 2004. ‘The Most We Can Hope For … ’: Human Rights and the Politics of Fatalism. South Atlantic Quarterly, 103:451–463. doi: 10.1215/00382876-103-2-3-451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhoun, Craig. 1992. Introduction. In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun, 1–48. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, George. 2011. Submission to the Court of Human Rights. http://www.glcarey.co.uk/Speeches/PressReleases/ECHR.html (Accessed 11 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Casanova, José. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casanova, José. 2006. Secularisation Revisited: A Reply to Talal Asad. In Powers of the Secular Modern: Talal Asad and His Interlocutors, edited by David Scott & Charles Hirschkind, 12–30. Stanford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christians in Parliament. 2012. Clearing the Ground Inquiry. http://www.eauk.org/current-affairs/publications/upload/Clearing-the-ground.pdf (Accessed 9 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Clucas, Rob. 2012. Religion, Sexual Orientation and the Equality Act 2010: Gay Bishops in the Church of England Negotiating Rights Against Discrimination. Sociology, 46:936–950. doi: 10.1177/0038038512451533
   Google Scholar
• Comaroff, John. 2009. Reflections on the Rise of Legal Theology: Law and Religion in the Twenty-First Century. Social Analysis, 53:193–216.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, Jane, Marie-Bénédicte Dembour, & Richard Wilson. 2002. Introduction. In Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives, edited by Jane Cowan, Marie-Bénédicte Dembour, & Richard Wilson, 1–26. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ditum, Sarah. 2012, September 14. Can Anti-Abortion and Pro-Choice Campaigners Agree on Anything? The Guardian [online]. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/sep/14/can-anti-abortion-pro-choice-campaigners-agree (Accessed 14 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Donald, Alice, Karen Bennett, & Philip Leach. 2012. Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report 84. Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report Series. http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/documents/research/rr84_final_opt.pdf (Accessed 17 April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Duranti, Marco. 2012. The Holocaust, the Legacy of 1789 and the Birth of International Human Rights Law: Revisiting the Foundation Myth. Journal of Genocide Research, 14:159–186. doi: 10.1080/14623528.2012.677760
   Google Scholar
• Duranti, Marco.. 2017. The Conservative Human Rights Revolution: European Identity, Transnational Politics, and the Origins of the European Convention. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felski, Rita. 1989. Beyond Feminist Aesthetics: Feminist Literature and Social Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. 1995. Politics, Culture, and the Public Sphere: Toward a Postmodern Conception. In Social Postmodernism: Beyond Identity Politics, edited by Linda Nicholson & Steven Seidman, 287–312. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, Michael. 1994. The Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 16:491–514. doi: 10.2307/762434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, Michael.. 2004. The Problem of Secularism in Human Rights Theory. Human Rights Quarterly, 26:375–400. doi: 10.1353/hrq.2004.0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, Faye. 1989. Contested Lives: The Abortion Debate in an American Community. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, Udi. 2017. Against Conservative Internationalism. Dissent, 64:181–186. doi: 10.1353/dss.2017.0062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 2002 [1962]. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Susan F. 1991. Representing Fundamentalism: The Problem of the Repugnant Other. Social Research, 58:373–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauerwas, Stanley. 1987. On the ‘Right’ to be Tribal. Christian Scholars Review, 16:238–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Mark, Russell Sandberg & Norman Doe. 2011. Religion and Law in the United Kingdom. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschkind, Charles. 2006. The Ethical Soundscape: Cassette Sermons and Islamic Counterpublics. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, Arlie. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, Axel. 1992. Integrity and Disrespect: Principles of a Conception of Morality Based on the Theory of Recognition. Political Theory, 20:187–201. doi: 10.1177/0090591792020002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman. 2015. Beyond Religious Freedom: The New Global Politics of Religion. Princeton: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, Webb. 2008. The Evidence of the Senses and the Materiality of Religion. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 14:S110–S127. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.00496.x
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, Tobias. 2011. The Cause of Human Rights: Doubts About Torture, Law and Ethics at the United Nations. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17:728–744. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01716.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinchen, Rosie. 2012. We Will Shock You. The Sunday Times Magazine [online]. November 4. http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/Magazine/Features/article1155984.ece (Accessed 11 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Little, David. 2015. Essays on Religion and Human Rights: Ground to Stand On. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCrea, Ronan. 2010. Religion and the Public Order of the European Union. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McIvor, Méadhbh. 2015. Carnal Exhibitions: Material Religion and the European Court of Human Rights. Ecclesiastical Law Journal, 17:3–14. doi: 10.1017/S0956618X14000866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIvor, Méadhbh.. 2016. To Fulfil the Law: Evangelism, Legal Activism and Public Christianity in Contemporary England (PhD Thesis). London School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Morsink, Johannes. 1999. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting, and Intent. Philadelphia: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moyn, Samuel. 2010. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moyn, Samuel.. 2015. Christian Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niezen, Ronald. 2010. Public Justice and the Anthropology of Law. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, Morten. 2017. The Politics of Paradox: Kierkegaardian Theology and National Conservatism in Denmark. In Distortion: Social Processes Beyond the Structured and Systemic, edited by Nigel Rapport, 84–106. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peroni, Lourdes. 2014. Deconstructing ‘Legal’ Religion in Strasbourg. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 3:235–257. doi: 10.1093/ojlr/rwt047
   Google Scholar
• Pojman, Louis. 1991. A Critique of Contemporary Egalitarianism: A Christian Perspective. Faith and Philosophy, 8:481–504. doi: 10.5840/faithphil19918437
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, Ben. 2011, May 30. Anti-Abortion Groups Raise Stakes by Deploying US Tactics on UK Streets. The Guardian [online]. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/may/30/anti-abortion-protest-groups (Accessed 11 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Riles, Annalise. 2006. Anthropology, Human Rights, and Legal Knowledge: Culture in the Iron Cage. American Anthropologist, 108:52–65. doi: 10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard. 1982. Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rozenberg, Joshua. 2011. Fostering Discrimination. Standpoint Magazine [online]. http://www.standpointmag.co.uk/node/3830/full (Accessed 11 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, Russell. 2011. The Right to Discriminate. Ecclesiastical Law Journal, 13:157–181. doi: 10.1017/S0956618X11000044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, Arvind. 2006. Are Human Rights Western? A Contribution to the Dialogue of Civilisations. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, Sally. 1997. Beyond Control: Medical Power and Abortion Law. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherwood, Y. 2012. Biblical Blaspheming: Trials of the Sacred for a Secular Age. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stychin, Carl. 2009. Closet Cases: ‘Conscientious Objection’ to Lesbian and Gay Legal Equality. Griffith Law Review, 18:17–38. doi: 10.1080/10383441.2009.10854628
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers. 2005. The Impossibility of Religious Freedom. Princeton: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarlo, Emma. 2010. Visibly Muslim: Fashion, Politics, Faith. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Tasioulas, John. 2007. The Moral Reality of Human Rights. In Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Who Owes What to the Very Poor?, edited by Thomas Pogge, 75–102. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, Michael. 1999. The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics and the Ethics of Queer Life. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, Michael.. 2002. Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Weizman, Elian. 2016. Cause Lawyering and Resistance in Israel: The Legal Strategies of Adalah. Social & Legal Studies, 25:43–68. doi: 10.1177/0964663915587158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, Tisa. 2017. Religious Freedom: The Contested History of an American Ideal. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westermeyer, William H. 2016. Local Tea Party Groups and the Vibrancy of the Movement. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 39:121–138. doi: 10.1111/plar.12175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Andrea Minichiello. 2011, March 8. Permanent Exclusion and the Johns. Christian Concern [online]. http://christianconcern.com/blog/permanent-exclusion-and-the-johns (Accessed 11 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Alan. 2011, March 5. Homosexuality, Christianity and Child Welfare. The Guardian [online]. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2011/mar/05/views-on-homosexuality-children-welfare (Accessed 11 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1987. Christianity and Social Justice. Christian Scholars Review, 16:211–228.
   Google Scholar
• Wolterstorff, Nicholas.. 2008. Justice: Rights and Wrongs. Princeton: University Press.
   Google Scholar