Investigation into surface acoustic wave sensor for DCM gas detection using COMSOL multiphysics

References

• R. M. White, and F. W. Voltmer, Direct piezoelectric coupling to surface elastic waves, Appl. Phys. Lett. 7 (12), 314 (1965). DOI: 10.1063/1.1754276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Datta, Surface Acoustic Wave Devices (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, MA, 1986).
   Google Scholar
• P. Delsing et al., The 2019 surface acoustic waves roadmap, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 52 (35), 353001 (2019). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab1b04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. A. Ash, and E. G. S. Paige, Rayleigh-Wave Theory and Application (Berlin, Springer, 1985).
   Google Scholar
• R. C. Williamson, and T. W. Bristol, Special issue on surface-acoustic-wave applications, IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason. 28, 2 (1981).
   Google Scholar
• I.-T. Tang et al., Applications of piezoelectric ZnO film deposited on diamond-like carbon coated onto Si substrate under fabricated diamond SAW filter, J. Cryst. Growth 262 (1-4), 461 (2004). DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.10.081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Jiang et al., Analysis of surface acoustic wave pressure sensors, Sens. Actuators A. 118 (1), 1 (2005). DOI: 10.1016/S0924-4247(04)00489-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Leonhard, and M. Ismail, Wireless measurement of temperature using surface acoustic waves sensors, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelect. Freq. Contr. 51, 1457 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. El-Shennawy, M. S. Orabi, and T. E. Taha, Simulation of high sensitivity and stability surface acoustic wave NO2 gas sensor based on amplitude variations as measurand, 22^nd International Conference on Microelectronics (2000), 2000, Vol. 2, NIS, Yugoslavia, pp. 611–614.
   Google Scholar
• H. Wohltjen, Mecharusm of operation and design conslderatlons for surface acoustic wave device vapor sensors, Sens. Actuators 5 (4), 307 (1984). DOI: 10.1016/0250-6874(84)85014-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Arsat et al., Graphene-like nano-sheets for surface acoustic wave gas sensor applications, Chem. Phys. Lett. 467 (4-6), 344 (2009). DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.11.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. J. Ricco, S. J. Martin, and T. E. Zipperian, Surface acoustic wave gas sensor based on film conductivity change, Sens. Actuators 8 (4), 319 (1985). DOI: 10.1016/0250-6874(85)80031-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. P. Jakubik et al., Bilayer structure for hydrogen detection in a surface acoustic wave sensor system, Sens. Actuators B 82 (2-3), 265 (2002). DOI: 10.1016/S0925-4005(01)01061-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Yang et al., Two-dimensional layered nanomaterials for gas-sensing applications, Inorg. Chem. Front. 3 (4), 433 (2016). DOI: 10.1039/C5QI00251F.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Trolier-McKinstry et al., High-performance piezoelectric crystals, ceramics, and films, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 48 (1), 191 (2018). DOI: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070616-124023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Liu et al., A survey on gas sensing technology, Sensors 12 (7), 9635 (2012). DOI: 10.3390/s120709635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. F. Estill, and A. B. Spencer, Case study: control of methylene chloride exposures during furniture stripping, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 57 (1), 43 (1996). DOI: 10.1080/15428119691015205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Beauchet, P. Magnoux, and J. Mijoin, Catalytic oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) mixture (isopropanol/O-xylene) on zeolite catalysts, Catal. Today 124 (3-4), 118 (2007). DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.03.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ramanavičius, A. Ramanavičienė, and A. Malinauskas, Electrochemical sensors based on conducting polymer-polypyrrole, Electrochim. Acta 51 (27), 6025 (2006). DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.11.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.-S. Joo et al., Polymer film SAW sensors for chemical agent detection, Proceedings of the Conference on Sensing Technology, Palmerston North, New Zealand, 2005, pp. 307–310.
   Google Scholar
• R. Lerch, Simulation of piezoelectric devices by two- and three-dimensional finite elements, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Contr. 37 (3), 233 (1990). DOI: 10.1109/58.55314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Ho, et al., Development of a surface acoustic wave sensor for in-situ monitoring of volatile organic compounds, Sensors 3 (7), 236 (2003). DOI: 10.3390/s30700236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ahmadi, Characterization of multi- and single-layer structure SAW sensor, Sensors 2004 Proce. IEEE. 3, 1129 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• S. Tonami, A. Nishikata, and Y. Shimizu, Characteristic of leaky surface acoustic wave propagating on LiNbO3 and LiTaO3 substrates, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 34 (Part 1, No. 5B), 2664 (1995). DOI: 10.1143/JJAP.34.2664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. B. Raj et al., Distinct detection of liquor ammonia by ZnO/SAW sensor: study of complete sensing mechanism, Sens. Actuators B. 238, 83 (2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.07.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. C. Horrillo et al., Optimization of SAW sensors with a structure ZnO-SiO2-Si to detect volatile organic compounds, Sens. Actuators B 118 (1-2), 356 (2006). DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2006.04.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. A. Maugin, Elastic surface waves with transverse horizontal polarization, Adv. Appl. Mech. 23, 373 (1983).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. L. Wang, and J. Song, Piezoelectric nanogenerators based on zinc oxide nanowire arrays, Science 312 (5771), 242 (2006). DOI: 10.1126/science.1124005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Acosta et al., BaTiO3-based piezoelectrics: fundamentals, current status, and perspectives, Appl. Phys. Rev. 4 (4), 041305 (2017). DOI: 10.1063/1.4990046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Karaki, K. Yan, and M. Adachi, Barium titanate piezoelectric ceramics manufactured by two-step sintering, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46 (10B), 7035 (2007). DOI: 10.1143/JJAP.46.7035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar