Emerging digital plan data – new research perspectives on planning practice and evaluation

References

• Alfasi, N., Almagor, J., & Benenson, I. (2012). The actual impact of comprehensive land-use plans: Insights from high resolution observations. Land Use Policy, 29(4), 862–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baaner, L., Anker, H. T., & Hvingel, L. (2016). Nye perspektiver på dansk areallovgivning – Om geodata og digitalisering. Nordisk Administrativt Tidsskrift, 93(3), 81–98.
   Google Scholar
• Bakken, H. J. (2018). E-mail correspondance with Hilde Bakken, Norwegian Municipal and Modernisation Department. Accessed April 9.
   Google Scholar
• Behm, D., Bryan, T., Lordemann, J., & Thomas, S. R. (2018). The past,present, and future of geospatial data use. In The state and future of GEOINT 2018 (pp. 15–18). Herndon, Virginia: The United States Geospatial Intelligence Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Berglund, G., & Kvifte, H. (2015). Sluttrapport - Statistikk og analyser av plandata. Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet & Asplan Viak AS. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/74b46988eda1470a87ccf811e94325d3/statistikk_analyse_plandata_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bundgaard, B., & Skov-Petersen, H. (1990). Georelaterede databaser i Danmark - en forundersøgelse. Sektion for Land og Byplanlægning, KVL.
   Google Scholar
• Busck, A. G., Hidding, M. C., Kristensen, S. B. P., Persson, C., & Præstholm, S. (2008). Managing rurban landscapes in the Netherlands, Denmark and Sweden: Comparing planning systems and instruments in three different contexts. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 108(2), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., & Sieh, L. (2008). Performance measurement in planning—towards a holistic view. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(2), 428–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspersen, O. H., & Nyed, P. K. (2013). Udviklingen i byernes grønne areal. Copenhagen: Institute of Geosciences and Nature Management and Danish Nature Agency. Retrieved from. http://ign.ku.dk/formidling/publikationer/andre-publikationer/2014-filer/Rapport-groen-by-13-5-F.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, J. R. (2015). Performativity. In Oxford bibliographies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from. DOI:10.1093/obo/9780199766567-0114
   Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L. (2002). The contingency of universality”: some thoughts on discourse and realism. Social Semiotics, 12(1), 83–114.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, A. A. (2016). Agrarian Landscape Management in a Modernized World ( PhD Thesis). Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2015). Planning as practice of knowing. Planning Theory, 14(3), 316–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, L., & Poelman, H. (2010). A revised urban-rural typology. In B. Feldmann & Å. Önnerfors, Eds. Eurostat regional yearbook 2010. Vols. 1–15, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. p. 239–253. Retrieved from. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Urban-rural_typology.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, J., Ma, C., Cheng, W., & Xin, L. (2017). Data augmented design: Urban planning and design in the new data environment. In 2017 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Big Data Analysis (ICBDA) (pp. 508–512). Beijing, China. doi:10.1109/ICBDA.2017.8078685
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., & Müller, A. (2012). The role of spatial data and spatial information in strategic spatial planning. Regional Studies, 46(4), 423–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. (2017). How digital is your country? Europe improves but still needs to close digital gap (Press release). Brussels. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-347_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Edvardsen, M. (2011). Evaluations of local planning efforts: A simple test of policy implementation and corresponding results?. In A. Hull, E. R. Alexander, A. Khakee, & J. Woltjer (Eds.), Evaluation for Participation and Sustainability in Planning (pp. 47–66). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• EEA. (2016). Corine land cover data version 18. The European Topic Centre on Land Use and Spatial Information: http://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover/views. Accessed June 2016.
   Google Scholar
• EEA. (2017a). Nationally designated areas (CDDA), Version 12, 2016. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/nationally-designated-areas-national-cdda-12. Accessed July 2017.
   Google Scholar
• EEA. (2017b). Natura 2000 data - the European network of protected sites. Data reported in 2016. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/natura-8. Accessed June 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Elbo, K., & Larsen, H. (2005). PlansystemDK : Nyt plansystem for digitale plandata. Stads- Og Havneingeniøren, 96(12), 10 –12.
   Google Scholar
• EM. (2017). Bekendtgørelse om ændring af bekendtgørelse om det digitale planregister PlansystemDK, Pub. L. No. BEK nr 1453 af 11/12/2017 Gældende. Retrieved from https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=196382
   Google Scholar
• Erhversstyrelsen. (2017). Overordnet baggrundsnotat om Plandata.dk [General background note on Plandata.dk]. Danish Business Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=641173
   Google Scholar
• Fertner, C. (2012). Downscaling European urban-rural typologies. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 112(1), 77–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galland, D., & Enemark, S. (2012). The Danish national spatial planning framework: fluctuating capacities of planning policies and institutions. In G.-J. Knaap, Z. Nedović-Budić, & A. Carbonell (Eds.), Planning for states and nation-states in the U.S. and Europe (pp. 339–375). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Grădinaru, R. S., Iojă, I. C., Pătru-Stupariu, I., & Hersperger, M. A. (2017). Are spatial planning objectives reflected in the evolution of urban landscape patterns? a framework for the evaluation of spatial planning outcomes. Sustainability, 9(8). doi:10.3390/su9081279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor, O. (2014). PlansystemDK - en status efter kommuneplan 2013. Landinspektøren, 56(1), 36–38.
   Google Scholar
• Guyadeen, D., & Seasons, M. (2016). Evaluation theory and practice: comparing program evaluation and evaluation in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 38(1), 98–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersperger, A. M., Mueller, G., Knöpfel, M., Siegfried, A., & Kienast, F. (2017). Evaluating outcomes in planning: Indicators and reference values for Swiss landscapes. Ecological Indicators, 77, 96–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersperger, A. M., Oliveira, E., Pagliarin, S., Palka, G., Verburg, P., Bolliger, J., & Grădinaru, S. (2018). Urban land-use change: The role of strategic spatial planning. Global Environmental Change, 51(July 2018), 32–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepsen, M. R., & Levin, G. (2013). Semantically based reclassification of Danish land-use and land-cover information. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27(12), 2375–2390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartverket. (2018). Plansatsning i Norge digitalt 2018–2020. Retrieved from https://www.geonorge.no/globalassets/geonorge2/avtaler-og-bilag-norge-digitalt/info-nd-plan-modell-2018-2020-versjon-pr-23022018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kiib, H. (1996). Denmark: Local autonomy, register based information systems and GIS. In I. Masser, H. Campbell, & M. Craglia, (Eds.), GIS diffusion: the adoption and use of geographical information systems in local government in Europe (pp. 125–143). London: Taylor & Francis Ltd. Retrieved from. https://www.crcpress.com/GIS-Diffusion-The-Adoption-And-Use-Of-Geographical-Information-Systems/Masser-Campbell-Craglia/p/book/9780748404957.
   Google Scholar
• Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (2015). Planning culture—a concept to explain the evolution of planning policies and processes in Europe? European Planning Studies, 23(11), 2133–2147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizek, K., Forysth, A., & Slotterback, C. S. (2009). Is there a role for evidence-based practice in urban planning and policy? Planning Theory & Practice, 10(4), 459–478.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, H. (2018a). Nye plandata - nye muligheder. Geoforum, (190), 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, H. (2018b). Interview with Henrik Larsen, Danish Business Authority. Accessed January 23.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, G., Frederiksen, P., & Nainggolan, D. (2018). Land-use trends related to natura 2000 sites in Denmark. Land Use Policy, 76, 432–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, D., Bursztyn, M., Novira, N., Purushothaman, S., Verburg, R., & Rodrigues-Filho, S. (2014). Taking account of governance: The challenge for land-use planning models. Land Use Policy, 37(SupplementC), 6–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MFVM. (2016). Aftale om Naturpakke. Copenhagen: Miljø- og Fødevareministeriet (Ministry for Environment and Food of Denmark).
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Environment. (2012). Spatial planning in Denmark. Copenhagen: The Danish Nature Agency. Retrieved from. https://danishbusinessauthority.dk/sites/default/files/media/2012_planning_eng_guide.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nue, C. (2003). “Det grå guld” i teknisk forvaltning. Stads- Og Havneingeniøren, 94(9), 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, V., & Pinho, P. (2009). Evaluating plans, processes and results. Planning Theory & Practice, 10(1), 35–63.
   Google Scholar
• Padeiro, M. (2016). Conformance in land-use planning: The determinants of decision, conversion and transgression. Land Use Policy, 55, 285–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, A. (2012). Lokalplanlægning i Danmark 2009–2011. Sammenfattende rapport. København: Dansk Byplanlaboratorum.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, M., & Blotevogel, H. H. (2012). Comparing spatial planning practice in Europe: A plea for cultural sensitization. Planning Practice & Research, 27(1), 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Steinnes, M. (2016). Areal for boligbygging beregnet fra kommuneplanens arealdel. Metode for identifisering av ledige områder (No. 31) (p. 36). Statistics Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Svenningsen, S. R., Levin, G., & Jepsen, M. R. (2015). Decrease in Danish semi-natural grassland – A social construct or a real-world change? Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 115(2), 157–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trollegaard, S. (1989). Planregistret - en kompleterende registrering af offentligretlige rådighedsindskrænkninger. Landinspektøren, Årg. 98 = bd., 34(9), 602–609.
   Google Scholar
• Trollegaard, S. (1992). Planinformationssystemet - PLANINFO. Byplan, 92(3), 78–82.
   Google Scholar
• UN. (2017). New urban agenda. Quito: Author. p. 66. Retrieved from. http://habitat3.org/the-new-urban-agenda.
   Google Scholar
• UNECE. (1998). Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters. Aarhus, Denmark: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Retrieved from. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/aarhus/.
   Google Scholar