200
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue Section: Digital Transdisciplinarity in Land Change Science – Integrating Multiple Types of Digital Data

Applying LPIS data to assess loss of agricultural land – experiences from Flanders and Denmark

& ORCID Icon
Pages 17-29 | Received 30 Mar 2018, Accepted 16 Oct 2018, Published online: 25 Oct 2018

References

  • Alterman, R. (1997). The challenge of farmland preservation: Lessons from a six-nation comparison. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(2), 220–243.
  • Boatman, N. D., Pietravalle, S., Parry, H. R., Crocker, J., Irving, P., Turley, D. B., … Dwyer, J. C. (2010). Agricultural land use and skylark Alauda arvensis: A case study linking a habitat association model to spatially explicit change scenarios. Ibis, 152, 63–76.
  • Bomans, K., Dewaelheyns, V., & Gulinck, H. (2011). Pasture for horses: An underestimated land use class in an urbanized and multifunctional area. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 6(2), 195–211.
  • Danish Geodata Agency. (2016). Summer orthophotos 2016. Copenhagen: Danish Geodata Agency.
  • Danish Ministry of Food and Agriculture. (2011). Danish LPIS database 2011. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Food and Agriculture.
  • Danish Ministry of Food and Agriculture. (2016). Danish LPIS database 2016. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Food and Agriculture.
  • De Waegemaeker, J. (2017). Climate proof through design. Research and design for climate adaptation in peri-urban territories. PhD thesis Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • EEC (1992). Council Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92 of 27 November 1992 establishing an Integrated Administration and Control System for certain community aid schemes. p. 5.
  • European Access to Land network, 2017. Access to land and community supported agriculture. Stories from Europe. http://www.accesstoland.eu/Access-to-land-and-Community-Supported-Agriculture
  • European Parliament, 2016. Land rush. The sellout of Europe’s farmland. https://www.greens-efa.eu/files/doc/docs/19abd146a6f61773450e58f438b3d287.pdf
  • Flemish Geographical Information Agency. (2013). Digital version of orthophotos 2013. Brussels: Geopunt Vlaanderen.
  • García-Ruiz, J., & Lana-Renault, N. (2011). Hydrological and erosive consequences of farmland abandonment in Europe, with special reference to the Mediterranean region – A review. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 140, 317–338.
  • Gyldenkærne, S., Levin, G., Lærke, P. E., Elsgaard, L., Olesen, J. E., & Taghizadeh-Toos, T., (2017) Afdæning af usikkerheder ved brug af LULUCF-kreditter. Memorandum from Aarhus University, DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy/DCA - Danish Centre for Food and Agriculture. http://dce.au.dk/fileadmin/dce.au.dk/Udgivelser/Notater_2017/Afdaekning_LULUCF_kreditter_revideret_notat_31082017_final.pdf
  • Heldbjerg, H., Fox, A., Levin, G., & Nyegaard, T. (2016). The decline of the Starling Sturnus vulgaris in Denmark is related to changes in the grassland extent and the intensity of cattle grazing. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 230, 24–31.
  • Hulme, T., Grosskopf, T., & Hidle, J., 2002. Agricultural land classification. Agfact AC.25 NSW Agriculture, Wagga Wagga, 15 pp.
  • Jongeneel, R., Polman, N., & Slangen, L. (2008). Why are Dutch farmers going multifunctional? Land Use Policy, 25(1), 81–94.
  • Kerselaers, E., Rogge, E., Dessein, J., Lauwers, L., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2011). Prioritising land to be preserved for agriculture: A context-specific value tree. Land Use Policy, 28, 219–226.
  • Kerselaers, E., Rogge, E., Lauwers, L., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2015). Decision support for prioritising of land to be preserved for agriculture: Can participatory tool development help? Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 110, 208–220.
  • Kerselaers, E., Rogge, E., Vanempten, E., Lauwers, L., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2013). Changing land use in the countryside: Stakeholders’ perception of the ongoing rural planning processes in Flanders. Land Use Policy, 23, 197–206.
  • Kerselaers, E., Van den Haute, F., Verhoeve, A., & Rogge, E. (2017). The use of LPIS, aerial photographs and expert knowledge to quantify changes in farmland area. Presented at IALE 2017 European Landscape Ecology Congress, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Kline, J., & Wichelns, D. (1998). Measuring heterogeneous preferences for preserving farmland and open space. Ecological Economics, 26, 211–224.
  • Kyndesen, M. B. J., Vesterager, J. P., Busck, A. G., Primdahl, J., Vejre, H., Kristensen, L. S., … Nissen, A. L. (2016). Bynære landbrugsområder i Hovedstadsregionen 2014: Udvikling i landbrug, landskab og bebyggelse 1984–2014. København: Institut for Geovidenskab og Naturforvaltning, Københavns Universitet. IGN Rapport. http://static-curis.ku.dk/portal/files/162382639/IGN_Rapport_Byn_re_landbrugsomr_der_2014small.pdf
  • Levin, G. (2013). Applying parcel-specific land-use data for improved monitoring of semi-natural grassland in Denmark. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185, 2615–2625.
  • Levin, G., Blemmer, M., Gyldenkærne, S., Johannsen, V. K., Caspersen, O. H., Petersen, H. S., … NordLarsen, T. (2014) Estimating land use/land cover changes in Denmark from 1990 – 2012. Technical documentation for the assessment of land use/land cover changes for estimation of carbon dioxide fixation in soil. Aarhus University, DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy, 34 pp. Technical Report from DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 38
  • Levin, G., Iosub, C.-I., & Rudbeck Jepsen, M. (2017). Basemap02: Technical documentation of a model for elaboration of a land-use and land-cover map for Denmark. Aarhus University, DCE - Danish centre for environment and energy. Technical report from DCE; Nr. 95.
  • Levin, G., & Jepsen, M. R. (2010). Abolition of set-aside schemes, associated impacts on habitat structure and modelling of potential effects of cross-farm regulation. Ecological Modelling, 221, 2728–2737.
  • Levin, G., & Nainggolan, D. (2016). The significance of spatial fragmentation of land ownership for occurrence of scrubs on semi-natural grasslands. Landscape Ecology, 31, 2031–2044.
  • Levin, G., Nainggolan, D., & Frederiksen, F. (2018). Land-use trends related to Natura2000 sites in Denmark. Land Use Policy, 76, 432–441.
  • Lichtenberg, E., & Ding, C. (2008). Assessing farmland protection policy in China. Land Use Policy, 25, 59–68.
  • Lomba, A., Strohbach, M., Jerrentrup, S., Dauber, J., Klimek, S., & McCracken, D. (2017). Making the best of both worlds: Can high-resolution agricultural administrative data support the assessment of High Nature Value farmlands across Europe? Ecological Indicators, 72, 118–130.
  • Madsen, M. F., Kristensen, S. B. P., Fertner, C., Busck, A. G., & Jørgensen, G. (2010). Urbanisation of rural areas: A case study from Jutland, Denmark. Geografisk Tidsskrift/Danish Journal of Geography, 110(1), 47–63.
  • Morgan, J. L., Gergel, S. E., & Coops, N. C. (2010). Aerial photography: A rapidly evolving tool for ecological management. BioScience, 60, 47–59. doi:10.1525/bio.2010.60.1.9
  • Nitsch, H., Osterburg, B., Roggendorf, W., & Laggner, B. (2012). Cross compliance and the protection of grassland—Illustrative analyses of land use transitions between permanent grassland and arable land in German regions. Land Use Policy, 29, 440–448.
  • Olsson, G., Kerselaers, E., Kristensen, L., Primdahl, J., Rogge, E., & Wästfelt, A. (2016). Peri-urban food production and its relation to urban resilience. Sustainability, 8(12), 1340.
  • Paül, V., & McKenzie, F. (2013). Peri-urban farmland conservation and the development of alternative food networks: Insights from a case-study area in metropolitan Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain). Land Use Policy, 30(1), 94–105.
  • Perrin, C. (2013). Regulation of farmland conversion on the urban fringe: From land-use planning to food strategies. Insight into two case studies in Provence and Tuscany. International Planning Studies, 18(1), 21–36.
  • Primdahl, J. (2014). Agricultural landscape sustainability under pressure: Policy developments and landscape change. Landscape Research, 39(2), 123–140.
  • Ribeiro, P. F., Santos, J. L., Bugalho, M. N., Santana, J., Reino, L., Beja, P., & Moreira, F. (2014). Modelling farming system dynamics in High Nature Value farmland under policy change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 183, 138–144.
  • Rogge, E., Kerselaers, E., & Prové, C. (2016). Envisioning opportunities for agriculture in peri-urban areas. In K. Andersson, S. Sjöblom, L. Granberg, P. Ehrström, & T. Marsden (Eds.), Metropolitan ruralities - Research in rural sociology and development (Vol. 23, pp. 161–189). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Sagris, V., & Devos, W. (2009). Core conceptual model for Land Parcel Identification System (LCM), GeoCAP version 1.1. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. 53 pp.
  • Tan, R., Beckmann, V., van Den Berg, L., & Qu, F. (2009). Governing farmland conversion: Comparing China with the Netherlands and Germany. Land Use Policy, 26, 961–974.
  • Thompson, A., & Prokopy, L. (2009). Tracking urban sprawl: Using spatial data to inform farmland preservation policy. Land Use Policy, 26, 194–202.
  • Trubins, R. (2013). Land-use change in southern Sweden: Before and after decoupling. Land Use Policy, 33, 161–169.
  • Verhoeve, A., Dewaelheyns, V., Kerselaers, E., Rogge, E., & Gulinck, H. (2015). Virtual farmland: Grasping the occupation of agricultural land by non-agricultural land uses. Land Use Policy, 42, 547–556.
  • Vuylsteke, A., Bergen, D., & Demuynck, E. (2014). Schaalgrootte en schaalvergroting in de vlaamse land-en tuinbouw (scale and scale enlargement in the Flemish agriculture and horticulture). (In Dutch). Brussel, Belgium: Departement Landbouw en Visserij, Afdeling Monitoring en Studie.
  • Zasada, I. (2011). Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture: A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy, 28, 639–648.
  • Zimmermann, J., González, A., Jones, M. B., O’Brien, P., Stout, J. C., & Green, S. (2016). Assessing land-use history for reporting on cropland dynamics—A comparison between the Land-Parcel Identification System and traditional inter-annual approaches. Land Use Policy, 52, 30–40.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.