378
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
EDUCATION MATTERS

The Links Between Understanding, Progression and Assessment in the Secondary Geography Curriculum

Pages 152-170 | Published online: 11 Aug 2020

References

  • ACCAC (Awdurdod Cwricwlwm ac Asesu Cymru - Curriculum and Assessment Authority for Wales) (2000) Geography in the National Curriculum in Wales. Cardiff: ACCAC.
  • Alonso, W (1964) Location and Land Use: Toward a general theory of land rent. Harvard CA: Harvard University Press.
  • Ausubel, D.P (1963) The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. Toronto: Grune & Stratton.
  • Beard, R.M. (1969) An Outline of Piaget's Developmental Psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Bennetts, T.H. (1981) ‘Progression in the geography curriculum’ in Walford, R. (ed) Signposts for Geography Teaching. Harlow: Longman, pp. 165-85.
  • Bennetts, T.H. (1995) ‘Continuity and progression’, Teaching Geography, 20, 2, pp. 75-9.
  • Bennetts, T.H. (1996) ‘Progression and differentiation’ in Bailey, P and Fox, P (eds) Geography Teachers' Handbook. Sheffield: Geographical Association, pp. 81-93.
  • Biggs, J.B. (1980) ‘The relationship between developmental level and the quality of school learning’ in Modgil, S. and Modgil, C. (eds) Toward a Theory of Psychological Development. Slough: NFER, pp. 591-633.
  • Biggs, J.B. (1999) Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
  • Biggs, J.B. and Collis, K.E. (1982) Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
  • Bird, J. (1993) The Changing Worlds of Geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Black, P. (1999) ‘Assessment, learning theories and testing systems’ Murphy, P. (ed) Learning, Learners and Assessment. Paul Chapman Publications, pp. 118-34.
  • Bliss, J. (1995) ‘Piaget and after: the case of learning science’, Studies in Science Education, 25, pp. 139-72.
  • Boardman, D. (1983) Graphicacy and Geography Teaching. London: Croom Helm.
  • Bradford, M. (2000) ‘Geography: pride of place’, Geography, 85, 4, pp. 311-21.
  • Broek, J. (1965) Geography. Its scope and purpose. Ohio: Columbus.
  • Brown, G. and Desforges, C. (1977) ‘Piagetian psychology and education: time for revision’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, pp. 7-17.
  • Bruner, J.S. (1966) Toward a Theory of Instruction. Harvard CA: Harvard University Press.
  • Burgess, E.W, Park, R.E. and McKenzie, R.D. (1925) The City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Daugherty, R.A. (1996) ‘Defining and measuring progression in geography’ in Rawling, E.M. and Daugherty, R.A. (eds) Geography in the Twenty-First Century. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 195-215.
  • Davies, A. (1998) The Limits of Educational Assessment. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Dearden, R.F. (1968) The Philosophy of Primary Education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • DfEE/QCA (1999) Geography. The national curriculum for England. London: DfEE/QCA.
  • DES/WO (1990) Geography for Ages 5 to 16. London/Cardiff: DES/WO.
  • Downs, R.M. and Liben, L.S. (1991) ‘The development of expertise in geography: a cognitive-developmental approach to geographical education’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81, 2, pp. 304-27.
  • Downs, R.M., Liben, L.S. and Daggs, D.G. (1988) ‘On education and geographers: the role of cognitive developmental theory in geographic education’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 78, 4, pp. 680-700.
  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Scott, P and Wood-Robinson, C. (1994a) ‘Young people's understanding of science concepts: implications of cross-age studies for curriculum planning’, Studies in Science Education, 24, pp. 75-100.
  • Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P, and Wood-Robinson, V. (1994b) Making Sense of Secondary Science. Research into children's ideas. London: Routledge.
  • Entwistle, N.J. (1979) ‘Stages, levels, styles or strategies: dilemmas in the description of thinking’, Educational Review, 31, 2, pp. 123-32.
  • Entwistle, N.J. (2000) ‘Approaches to studying and levels of understanding: the influences of teaching and assessment’ in Smart, J.C. (ed) Higher Education: Handbook of theory and research. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 156-218.
  • Entwistle, N.J. and Entwistle, A.C. (1997) ‘Revision and the experience of understanding’ in Marton, F., Hounsell, D.J. and Entwistle, N.J. (eds) The Experience of Learning (second edition). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
  • Entwistle, N.J. and Smith, C. (2002) ‘Personal understanding and target understanding: mapping influences on the outcomes of learning’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, pp. 321-42.
  • GA (2002) This is geography. A position statement from the Geographical Association (leaflet). Sheffield: Geographical Association.
  • Gagne, R.M. (1962) ‘The acquisition of knowledge’, Psychological Review, 69, pp. 355-65.
  • Gagne, R.M. (1970) The Conditions of Learning (second edition). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Gipps, C. and Stobart, G. (1993) Assessment. A teacher's guide to the issues (second edition). London: Hodder & Stoughton.
  • Gregory, D. (1996) ‘Entries on “model” (pp. 385-6) and “theory” (pp. 662-3) in Johnston, R. J. (ed) The Dictionary of Human Geography. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Haggett, P (1965) Locational Analysis in Human Geography. London: Arnold.
  • Haggett, P (1990) The Geographer's Art. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Harris, C.D. and Ullman, E.L. (1945) ‘The nature of cities’ reprinted in Mayer, H.M. and Kohn, C.F. (1959) Readings in Urban Geography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 277-86.
  • HMI (Her Majesty's Inspectorate) (1986) Geography from 5 to 16. Curriculum matters 7. London: HMSO.
  • Hodson, D. and Hodson, J. (1998) ‘From constructivism to social constructivism: a Vygotskian perspective on teaching and learning science’, School Science Review, June, pp. 33-41.
  • Holloway, S.L., Rice, S.P and Valentine, G. (2003) Key Concepts in Geography. London: Sage.
  • Hoyt, H. (1939) The Structure and Growth of Residential Neighbourhoods in American Cities. Washington: Federal Housing Administration.
  • Johnston, R.J. (1983) Philosophy and Human Geography. London: Arnold.
  • Johnston, R.J., Gregory, D. and Smith, D.M. (eds) (1994) The Dictionary of Human Geography (third edition). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Madaus, G.F. (1999) ‘The influence of testing on the curriculum’ in Early, M.J. and Rehage, K.J. (eds) Issues in Curriculum. A selection of chapters from past NSSE Yearbooks. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 71-111.
  • Mann, P (1965) An Approach to Urban Sociology. London: Routledge.
  • Marton, F. and Saljo, R. (1976) ‘On qualitative differences in learning’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, pp. 4-11 and 115-27.
  • Massey, D. (2002) ‘Globalisation: what does it mean for geography?’, Geography, 87, 4, pp. 293-6.
  • Matthews, J .A. and Herbert, D.T. (2004) Unifying Geography. Common heritage, shared future. London: Routledge.
  • McNee, R.B. (1967) ‘New approaches in introductory college courses’, Commission on College Geography. Publication No. 4. Washington: CCG.
  • Modgil, S. and Modgil, C. (eds) (1982) Jean Piaget Consensus and Controversy. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Newton, D.P (2000) Teaching for Understanding. London: Routledge Falmer.
  • OED (1989) Oxford English Dictionary (second edition). Oxford.
  • Pacione, M. (2001) ‘Models of urban land use structures in cities of the developed world’, Geography, 86, 2, pp. 97-119.
  • Pattison, W.D. (1964) ‘The four traditions of geography’, Journal of Geography, 63, 5, pp. 211-16.
  • Peel, E.A. (1971) The Nature of Adolescent Judgment. London: Staples Press.
  • Peel, E.A. (ed) (1972) ‘The quality of understanding in secondary school subjects’, Educational Review, 24, 3.
  • Phillips, D.C. and Soltis, J.F. (1998) Perspectives on Learning. Columbia: Teachers College, Columbia University.
  • QCA (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority) (2000) Geography. A scheme of work for key stage 3. London: QCA.
  • Rhys, WT. (1972) ‘Geography and the adolescent’, Educational Review, 24, 3, pp. 183-96.
  • Rhys, WT. (1973) ‘The development of logical thinking’ in Graves, N. (ed) New Movements in the Study and Teaching of Geography. London: Temple Smith, pp. 93-106.
  • SCAA (School Curriculum and Assessment Authority) (1994) Geography in the National Curriculum. Draft Proposals. London: SCAA.
  • Smith, C. (1998) Personal Understanding and Target Understanding: Their relationships through individual variations and curricular influences. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
  • Taaffe, E. J. (1974) ‘The spatial view in context’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 64, 1, pp. 1-16.
  • Taba, H. (1962) Curriculum Development. Theory and practice. New York: Harcourt Brace.
  • Tanck, M.L. (1969) ‘Teaching concepts, generalisations and constructs’ in Fraser, D.M. (ed) Social Studies Curriculum Developments: Prospects and problems. Washington: National Council for the Social Studies, pp. 99-138.
  • Thompson, L., Lodge, R. and Day, C. (2002) ‘The state of geography in secondary schools: six years on’, Teaching Geography, 27, 2, pp. 56-60.
  • Thomson, R. (1959) The Psychology of Thinking. Middlesex: Pelican.
  • Tomlinson-Keasey, C. (1982) ‘Structures, functions and stages: a trio of unresolved issues in formal operations’ in Modgil, S. and Modgil, C. (eds) Jean Piaget Consensus and Controversy. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, pp. 131-53.
  • Turner, J. (1984) Cognitive Development and Education. London: Methuen.
  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1962) Thought and Language. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  • White, R.T. and Gagne, R.M. (1974) ‘Past and future research on learning hierarchies’, Educational Psychology, 11, 1, pp. 19-28.
  • White, R. and Gunstone, R. (1992) Probing Understanding. London: Falmer Press.
  • Williams, M. (1997) ‘Progression and transition in a coherent geography curriculum’ in Tilbury, D. and Williams, M. (eds) Teaching and Learning Geography. London: Routledge, pp. 59-68.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.