On explaining political disagreement: The notion of an essentially contested conceptFootnote∗

I would like to thank David Miller, G. A. Cohen, Russell Keat, Kristjan Kristjansson, and the Philosophy Department Seminar at the University of Bristol for helpful criticisms of earlier pieces of work on this topic.

Notes

• Gallie , W. B. 1955–6 . ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’ . Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society , 56 : 167 – 98 .
   Google Scholar
• Gallie . 1964 . Philosophy and the Historical Understanding , London : Chatto & Windus .
   Google Scholar
• Connolly , W. 1983 . The Terms of Political Discourse , 2nd ed. , Oxford : M. Robertson .
   Google Scholar
• Hurley , S. 1985 . “ ‘Objectivity and Disagreement’ ” . In Morality and Objectivity: a Tribute to J. L. Mackie , Edited by: Honderich , T. London : Routledge & Kegan Paul .
   Google Scholar
• Lukes , S. 1974 . ‘Relativism: Cognitive and Moral’ . Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society , 48 ( suppl. ) : 165 – 89 .
   Google Scholar
• 1975 . Power: A Radical View , Atlantic Highlands : Humanities Press .
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre , A. 1973 . ‘The Essential Contestability of Some Social Concepts’ . Ethics , 84 : 1 – 9 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller , D. 1983 . ‘Constraints on Freedom’ . Ethics , 94 : 66 – 86 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 1985 . ‘Reply to Oppenheim’ . Ethics , 96 : 310 – 14 .
   Google Scholar
• Gellner , E. 1967 . ‘The Concept of a Story’ . Ratio , 19 : 49 – 66 .
   Google Scholar
• Connolly . The Terms of Political Discourse 11 op. cit.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes . Power: A Radical View 9 op. cit.
   Google Scholar
• Williams , B. A. O. 1981 . “ ‘Conflicts of Value’ ” . In Moral Luck , 71 Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Barry , B. 1975 . ‘The Obscurities of Power’ . Government and Opposition , 10 : 252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanton , C. 1985 . ‘On the “Essential Contestedness” of Political Concepts’ . Ethics , 95 : 815 – 16 .
   Google Scholar
• Lukes , S. ‘Relativism: Cognitive and Moral’ . 186 – 7 . op. cit.
   Google Scholar
• Barry , B. ‘The Obscurities of Power’ . 252 op. cit.
   Google Scholar
• Newton‐Smith , W. H. 1981 . The Rationality of Science , London : Routledge & Kegan Paul .
   Google Scholar
• Connolly , W. The Terms of Political Discourse 40 op. cit.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes , S. 1985 . Marxism and Morality , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan , A. E. 1982 . Marx and Justice: The Radical Critique of Liberalism , London : Methuen .
   Google Scholar
• 1958 . Marx and Engels Selected Works , vol. II , Moscow : Foreign Languages Publishing House .
   Google Scholar
• Cohen , G. A. 1978 . Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defence , Princeton : Princeton University Press . app. I
   Google Scholar
• Marx , K. 1961 . Capital , vol. I , 316 74 Moscow : Foreign Languages Publishing House .
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn , T. 1970 . The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , rev. ed. , Chicago : Chicago University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hanson , N. R. 1958 . Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Habermas , J. 1970 . ‘Towards a Theory of Communicative Competence’ . Inquiry , 13 : 372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas , J. 1973 . “ ‘Wahrheitstheorien’ ” . In Wirklichkeit und Reflexion: Walter Schultz zum 60. Geburtstag , Edited by: Fahrenbach , H. 258 Pfullingen : Neske .
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy , T. and Habermas , J. , eds. 1976 . Legitimation Crisis , xvii London : Heinemann .
   Google Scholar
• Habermas . Legitimation Crisis 111 op. cit.
   Google Scholar
• Seabright , P. 1988 . ‘Objectivity, Disagreement, and Projectability’ . Inquiry , 31 : 25 – 51 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovibond , S. 1983 . Realism and Imagination in Ethics , Oxford : Blackwell . esp. sect. 15 and 17
   Google Scholar
• I would like to thank David Miller, G. A. Cohen, Russell Keat, Kristjan Kristjansson, and the Philosophy Department Seminar at the University of Bristol for helpful criticisms of earlier pieces of work on this topic.
   Google Scholar