The edenic theory of reference

References

• Åkerman, J . 2010. “Communication and Indexical Reference.” Philosophical Studies 149 (3): 355–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arjo, D. 1996. “Sticking Up for Oedipus: Fodor on Intentional Generalizations and Broad Content.” Mind and Language 11 (3): 231–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydede, M. , and P. Robbins . 2001. “Are Frege Cases Exceptions to Intentional Generalizations?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31 (1): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, K . 1987. Thought and Reference . Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, K . 1992. “Paving the Road to Reference.” Philosophical Studies 67 (3): 295–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, K. , and R. Harnish . 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-On, D . 2013. “Origins of Meaning: Must We ‘Go Gricean’?” Mind & Language 28 (3): 342–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolet, R . 1987. “Speaker Reference.” Philosophical Studies 52 (2): 199–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breheny, R . 2006. “Communication and Folk Psychology.” Mind and Language 21 (1): 74–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burge, T . 1979. “Individualism and the Mental.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4: 73–121.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, Alexis , and David Plunkett . 2013a. “Conceptual Ethics I.” Philosophy Compass 8 (12): 1091–1101.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, A. , and D. Plunkett . 2013b. “Conceptual Ethics II.” Philosophy Compass 8 (12): 1102–1110.
   Google Scholar
• Camp, J. L . 2002. Confusion: A Study in the Theory of Knowledge . Cambridge, MA: HUP.
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, P . 1996. Language, Thought and Consciousness . Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Carston, R . 1998. “The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction: A View from Relevance Theory.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10 :1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Carston, R . 2002. Thoughts and Utterances . Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D . 2006. “Perception and the Fall from Eden.” In Perceptual Experience , edited by T. Gendler and J. Hawthorne , 49–125. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N . 1980. Rules and Representations . Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Dellsén, F . 2016. “Scientific Progress: Knowledge Versus Understanding.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56: 72–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devitt, M . 1974. “Singular Terms.” The Journal of Philosophy 71 (7): 183–205.
   Google Scholar
• Devitt, M . 1981. Designation . Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Devitt, M . 1991. Realism and Truth . 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donnellan, K . 1968. “Putting Humpty Dumpty together again.” The Philosophical Review 77 (2): 203–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnellan, K . 1970. “Proper Names and Identifying Descriptions.” Synthese 21 (3–4): 335–358.
   Google Scholar
• Elgin, C . 2007. “Understanding and the Facts.” Philosophical Studies 132 (1): 33–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, G. . 1973. “The Causal Theory of Names.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary 47 (1): 187–208. Repr. in Evans (1985), 1--24.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G . 1982. The Varieties of Reference . Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Field, H . 1973. “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference.” The Journal of Philosophy 70 (14): 462–481.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J . 1994. The Elm and the Expert . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• García-Carpintero, M . 2001. “Gricean Rational Reconstructions and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction.” Synthese 128 (1–2): 93–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauker, C . 2003. Words Without Meaning . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gauker, C . 2008. “Zero Tolerance for Pragmatics.” Synthese 165 (3): 359–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandy, R. , and R. Warner . 1986. “Paul Grice: A View of his Work.” In Philosophical Grounds of Rationality: Intentions, Categories, Ends , edited by Richard Grandy and Richard Warner . Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. S. 2007. Self-expression. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, M . 2014. “Troubles for Content I.” In Metasemantics: New Essays on the Foundations of Meaning , edited by A. Burgess and B. Sherman , 147–168. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, P . 1969. “Utterer’s Meaning and Intention.” The Philosophical Review 78 (2): 147–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, P . 1982. “Meaning Revisited.” In Mutual Knowledge , edited by N. Smith , 223–243. Repr. in Grice (1989), 283--303. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, P . 1989. Studies in the Way of Words . Cambridge, MA: HUP.
   Google Scholar
• Hanks, P . 2011. “Structured Propositions as Types.” Mind 120 (477): 11–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanks, P . 2015. Propositional Content . Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. W. 2016. “Intentionalism versus The New Conventionalism.” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 16 (47): 173–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R . 2012. “Solving Frege’s Puzzle.” Journal of Philosophy 109 (1/2): 132–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D . 1978. “Dthat.” Syntax and Semantics 9: 383–400.
   Google Scholar
• King, J. C. 2013. “Supplementives, the Coordination Account, and Conflicting Intentions.” Philosophical Perspectives 27 (1): 288–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, J. C. 2014. “Speaker Intentions in Context.” Noûs 48 (2): 219–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kripke, S . 1977. “Speaker’s Reference and Semantic Reference.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2: 6–27.
   Google Scholar
• Kripke, S . 1980. Naming and Necessity . Cambridge, MA: HUP.
   Google Scholar
• Lance, M. N. , and J. O’Leary-Hawthorne . 1997. The Grammar of Meaning: Normativity and Semantic Discourse . Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Lawlor, K . 2007. “A Notional Worlds Approach to Confusion.” Mind & Language 22 (2): 150–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. S. 2013. “Speaker’s Reference and Anaphoric Pronouns.” Philosophical Perspectives 27 (1): 404–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loar, B . 1986. Mind and Meaning . Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. H . 1980. “Meaning, Communication, and Knowledge.” In Philosophical Subjects: Essays Presented to P. F. Strawson , 117–139. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelson, E . 2013. “This and That: A Theory of Reference for Names, Demonstratives, and Things in between.” PhD thesis, UCLA.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelson, E . n.d. “Speaker’s Reference, Semantic Reference, Sneaky Reference."
   Google Scholar
• Millikan, R. G . 1984. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Millikan, R. G . 1989a. “Biosemantics.” The Journal of Philosophy 86 (6): 281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millikan, R. G. 1989b. “In Defense of Proper Functions.” Philosophy of Science 56 (2): 288–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millikan, R. G . 1994. “On Unclear and Indistinct Ideas.” Philosophical Perspectives 8: 75–100.
   Google Scholar
• Millikan, R. G . 1997. “Images of Identity. In Search of Modes of Presentation.” Mind 106 (423): 499–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millikan, R. G . 2000. On Clear and Confused Ideas: An Essay about Substance Concepts . Cambridge, MA: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Mizrahi, M . 2012. “Idealizations and Scientific Understanding.” Philosophical Studies 160 (2): 237–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, S . 1992. “Paul Grice and the Philosophy of Language.” Linguistics and Philosophy 15 (5): 509–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, S . 2004. "This, That, and the Other". In Descriptions and beyond , edited by M. Reimer and A. Bezuidenhout , 68–182. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, S . 2005. “Pragmatism and Binding.” In Semantics versus Pragmatics , edited by Z. Gendler Szabó , 165–285. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, S . 2016. “Silent Reference.” In Meanings and Other Things: Themes from the Work of Stephen Schiffer , edited by G. Ostertag , 229–344. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Origgi, G. , and D. Sperber . 2000. “Evolution, Communication and the Proper Function of Language.” In Evolution and the Human Mind , edited by P. Carruthers and A. Chamberlain , 140–169. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J . 2012. Reference and Reflexivity . 2nd ed. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H . 1973. “Meaning and Reference.” The Journal of Philosophy 70 (19): 699–711.
   Google Scholar
• Recanati, F . 2012. Mental Files . Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, M . 1992. “Three Views of Demonstrative Reference.” Synthese 93 (3): 373–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, M . 2004. “What Malapropisms Mean: A Reply to Donald Davidson.” Erkenntnis 60 (3): 317–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffer, S . 1972. Meaning . Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffer, S . 1981. “Indexicals and the Theory of Reference.” Synthese 49 (1): 43–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffer, S . 1982. “Intention-based Semantics.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23 (2): 119–156.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffer, S . 2003. The Things We Mean . Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffer, S . 2006. “Two Perspectives on Knowledge of Language.” Philosophical Issues 16 (1): 275–287.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffer, S . 2014. “Meaning and Formal Semantics in Generative Grammar.” Erkenntnis 80 (1): 61–87.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, S . 2005. “Direct Reference, Psychological Explanation, and Frege Cases.” Mind and Language 20 (4): 423–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, D. S. 1976. “Referring, Singular Terms, and Presupposition.” Philosophical Studies 30 (1): 63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott-Phillips, T . 2015. Speaking Our Minds: Why Human Communication is Different, and How Language Evolved to Make it Special . London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, G. M. A. 1997. “Content and Computation: Chasing the Arrows, a Critical Notice of Jerry Fodor’s the Elm and the Expert.” Mind and Language 12 (3 &4): 490–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soames, S . 2010. What is Meaning? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soames, S . 2014. "Cognitive Propositions". In New Thinking about Propositions , edited by J. C. King , S. Soames and J. Speaks , 91–124. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Speaks, J . 2016. The Role of Speaker and Hearer in the Character of Demonstratives. Mind 125 (498): 301–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, D. , F. Clément , C. Heintz , O. Mascaro , H. Mercier , G. Origgi , and D. Wilson . 2010. “Epistemic Vigilance.” Mind & Language 25 (4): 359–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, D. , and D. Wilson . 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition . 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stine, G. C. 1978. “Meaning Other Than What We Say and Referring.” Philosophical Studies 33 (4): 319–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strawson, P. F. 1950. “On Referring.” Mind 59 (235): 320–344.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, P. F . 1974. Subject and Predicate in Logic and Grammar . 2nd ed. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing. Pub. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Strevens, M . 2016. “How Idealizations Provide Understanding.” In Explaining Understanding: New Essays in Epistemology and the Philosophy of Science , edited by S. Grimm , C. Baumberger and S. Ammon , 37–49. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. R . 2014. “Meaning and Mindreading.” Mind and Language 29 (2): 167–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M . 2008. Origins of Human Communication . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Unnsteinsson, E . 2014. “Compositionality and Sandbag Semantics.” Synthese 191 (14): 3329–3350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnsteinsson, E . 2016. “Confusion is Corruptive Belief in False Identity.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (2): 204–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnsteinsson, E . 2017. “A Gricean Theory of Malaprops.” Mind and Language 32 (4): 446–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield, J. C. 2002. “Broad Versus Narrow Content in the Explanation of Action: Fodor on Frege Cases.” Philosophical Psychology 15 (2): 119–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, M . 2007. “Three Kinds of Idealization.” Journal of Philosophy 104 (12): 639–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wettstein, H. K. 1984. “How to Bridge the Gap between Meaning and Reference.” Synthese 58 (1): 63–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wharton, T . 2009. Pragmatics and Non-verbal Communication . Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, T . 2000. Knowledge and its Limits . Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. , and D. Sperber . 2012. Meaning and Relevance . Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L . 1953. Philosophical Investigations . 4th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, J. Schulte (2007).
   Google Scholar