Identity display: another motive for metalinguistic disagreement

References

• Ahlgren, M., I.-B. Gustafsson, and G. Hall. 2004. “Attitudes and Beliefs Directed Towards Ready-Meal Consumption.” Food Service Technology 4: 159–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-5740.2004.00102.x
   Google Scholar
• Amiraian, D., and J. Sobal. 2009. “Dating and Eating. Beliefs About Dating Foods among University Students.” Appetite 53 (2): 226–232. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asch, S. 1940. “Studies in the Principles of Judgments and Attitudes: II. Determination of Judgment by Group and by Ego Standards.” Journal of Social Psychology 12: 433–465. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1940.9921487
   Google Scholar
• Asch, S. 1948. “The Doctrine of Suggestion, Prestige and Imitation in Social Psychology.” Psychological Review 55: 250–276. doi: 10.1037/h0057270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balsley, G. 1950. “The Hot-Rod Culture.” American Quarterly 2 (4): 353–358. doi: 10.2307/3031226
   Google Scholar
• Barker, C. 2013. “Negotiating Taste.” Inquiry 56 (2-3): 240–257. doi: 10.1080/0020174X.2013.784482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, B. 1986. “Foreward.” In Frame Analysis, edited by E. Goffman, xi–xviii. York, PA: The Maple Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Carston, R. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, G. 1992. “The Culture of Production: Aesthetic Choices and Constraints in Culinary Work.” American Journal of Sociology 97 (5): 1268–1294. doi: 10.1086/229902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1969. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Middlesex: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. 1957. “Meaning.” The Philosophical Review 66 (3): 377–388. doi: 10.2307/2182440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hample, D., and A. Irions. 2015. “Arguing to Display Identity.” Argumentation 29 (4): 389–416. doi: 10.1007/s10503-015-9351-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, N. Forthcoming. “Metalinguistic Proposals.” Inquiry. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2019.1658628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komarovsky, M. 1946. “Cultural Contradictions and Sex Roles.” American Journal of Sociology 52 (3): 184–189. doi: 10.1086/219982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. 1969. Convention. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lindquist, J. 2002. A Place to Stand: Politics and Persuasion in a Working-Class Bar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, C. 1989. “The Art of the Impossible.” In Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law, edited by C. MacKinnon, 1–17. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, T. 2017. “What Metalinguistic Negotiations Can't do.” Phenomenology and Mind 12: 40–48.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, K. 2015. Feigning Objectivity: An Overlooked Conversational Strategy in Everyday Disputes. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University. Accessed from October 12 2019. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=osu1426205479&disposition=inline.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, R. 2005. “Getting Told and Being Believed.” Philosophers’ Imprint 5: 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, S. 2005. “Pragmatism and Binding.” In Semantics Versus Pragmatics, edited by Z. Szabo, 165–285. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plunkett, D., and T. Sundell. 2013. “Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms.” Philosophers’ Imprint 23: 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Plunkett, D., and T. Sundell. Forthcoming. “Metalinguistic Negotiation and Speaker Error.” Inquiry. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2019.1610055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohlhaus, G. 2012. “Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice: Toward a Theory of Willful Hermeneutical Ignorance.” Hypatia 27 (4): 715–735. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01222.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pool, G., W. Wood, and K. Leck. 1998. “The Self-Esteem Motive in Social Influence: Agreement with Valued Majorities and Disagreement With Derogated Minorities.” The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (4): 967–975. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Predelli, S. 2010. “Malapropisms and the Simple Picture of Communication.” Mind and Language 25 (3): 351–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01392.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietveld, E. 2008. “Situated Normativity: The Normative Aspect of Embodied Cognition in Unreflective Action.” Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 117 (468): 973–1001. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzn050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A. 1986. “Why Do We Believe What We Are Told?” Ratio 28: 69–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. 1992. Lectures on Conversation: Volume 1. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., and D. Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, J. 2007. Language in Context: Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, R., and C. Nemeroff. 1995. “Moral Overtones of Food: Judgments of Others Based on What They Eat.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21 (5): 480–490. doi: 10.1177/0146167295215006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenius, E. 1967. “Mood in a Language Game.” Synthese 17 (3): 254–274. doi: 10.1007/BF00485030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterken, R. K. Forthcoming. “Linguistic Intervention and Transformative Communicative Disruptions.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by H. Cappelen, D. Plunkett, and A. Burgess. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundell, T. 2011. “Disagreements About Taste.” Philosophical Studies 155: 267–288. doi: 10.1007/s11098-010-9572-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundell, T. 2016. “The Tasty, the Bold and the Beautiful.” Inquiry 59 (6): 793–818. doi: 10.1080/0020174X.2016.1208918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundell, T. 2017. “Aesthetic Negotiation.” In Semantics of Aesthetic Judgments, edited by J. Young, 82–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vartanian, L. C., P. Herman, and J. Polivy. 2007. “Consumption Stereotypes and Impression Management: How You Are What You Eat.” Appetite 48: 265–277. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, W., G. L. Pool, and D. Purvis. 1996. “Self-Definition, Defensive Processing, and Influence: The Normative Impact of Majority and Minority Groups.” The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (6): 1181–1193. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeman, D. 2016. “The Many Uses of Predicates of Taste and the Challenge from Disagreement.” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 46 (1): 79–101. doi: 10.1515/slgr-2016-0034
   Google Scholar
• Zeman, D. 2017. “Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement.” Phenomenology and Mind 12: 62–73.
   Google Scholar