Suspending judgment the correct way

References

• Archer, Avery. 2018. “Wondering About What You Know.” Analysis 78 (4): 596–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, Avery. forthcoming. “Agnosticism, Inquiry, and Unanswerable Questions.” Disputatio.
   Google Scholar
• Buchak, Lara. 2014. “Belief, Credence and Norms.” Philosophical Studies 169 (2): 285–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dretske, Fred. 1971. “Conclusive Reasons.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 49 (1): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Fantl, Jeremy, and Matthew McGrath. 2009. Knowledge in an Uncertain World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, Richard. 1993. Working Without a Net. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Jane. 2013a. “Suspended Judgment.” Philosophical Studies 162 (2): 165–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, Jane. 2013b. “Rational Agnosticism and Degrees of Belief.” In Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Volume 4, edited by T. S. Gendler, and J. Hawthorne, 57–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Jane. 2017. “Why Suspend Judging?” Noûs 51 (2): 302–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbard, Allan. 2005. “Truth and Correct Belief.” Philosophical Issues 15: 338–350.
   Google Scholar
• Goble, Lou. 2013. “Prima Facie Norms, Normative Conflicts, and Dilemmas.” In Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, edited by D. Gabbay, J. Horty, X. Parent, R. Meyden, and L. Torre, 241–349. Milton Keynes: College Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, Alvin. 1979. “What Is Justified Belief?” In Justification and Knowledge, edited by G. Pappas, 1–25. Boston: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Greco, John. 2010. Achieving Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajek, Alan. 1998. “Agnosticism Meets Bayesianism.” Analysis 58 (3): 199–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlobil, Ulf. 2019. “Goodness-Fixing Isn’t Good Enough: A Reply to McHugh and Way.” Mind 128 (512): 1309–1318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huemer, Michael. 2011. “The Puzzle of Metacoherence.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratzer, Angelika. 1977. “What ‘Must’ and ‘Can’ Must and Can Mean.” Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3): 337–355.
   Google Scholar
• Leitgeb, Hannes. 2014. “The Stability Theory of Belief.” Philosophical Review 123 (2): 131–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1996. “Elusive Knowledge.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (4): 549–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, Clayton. 2015. “Who Cares What You Accurately Believes?” Philosophical Perspectives 29 (1): 217–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, Clayton. forthcoming. “‘How and Why Knowledge Is First’.” In Knowledge-First Epistemology, edited by A. Carter, E. Gordon, and B. Jarvis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masny, Michal. forthcoming. “Friedman on Suspended Judgment.” Synthese. doi:10.1007/s11229-018-01957-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, Matthew. ms. “Epistemic Neutrality: Agnosticism, Inquiry, and Suspension of Judgment.”
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, Conor, and Jonathan Way. 2018. “What Is Good Reasoning?.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96 (1): 153–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miracchi, Lisa. 2015. “Competence to Know.” Philosophical Studies 172 (1): 29–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, Richard. 2016. Accuracy and the Laws of Credence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Priest, Graham. 2008. An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, Duncan. 2009. “Safety-Based Epistemology: Whither Now?” Journal of Philosophical Research 34: 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raleigh, Thomas. forthcoming. “Suspending Is Believing.” Synthese.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenkranz, Sven. 2007. “Agnosticism as a Third Stance.” Mind 116 (461): 55–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, Jacob, and Mark Schroeder. 2014. “Belief, Credence, and Pragmatic Encroachment.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2): 259–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rysiew, Patrick. 2018. “Factivity and Evidence.” In The Factive Turn in Epistemology, edited by V. Mitova, 50–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, Nishi. 2008. “How Action Governs Intention.” Philosophers’ Imprint 8: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, Roy. 2009. “Meta-Agnosticism: Higher Order Epistemic Possibility.” Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 118: 777–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staffel, Julia. 2016. “Beliefs, Buses and Lotteries: Why Rational Belief Can’t Be Stably High Credence.” Philosophical Studies 173 (7): 1721–1734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturgeon, Scott. 2010. “Confidence and Coarse-Grained Attitudes.” In Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Volume 3, edited by T. S. Gendler, and J. Hawthorne, 89–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Fraassen, Bas. 1989. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wedgwood, Ralph. 2002. “The Aim of Belief.” Philosophical Perspectives 36 (16): 267–297.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, Timothy. 2000. Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, Timothy. forthcoming. “Justifications, Excuses, and Sceptical Scenarios.” In The New Evil Demon, edited by F. Dorsch, and J. Dutant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar