The possible worlds theory of visual experience

References

• Averill, Edward, and Joseph Gottlieb. 2021. “Two Theories of Transparency.” Erkenntnis 86: 553–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, Ned. ms. The Border Between Seeing and Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Churchland, P. M. 2005. “Chimerical Colors: Some Phenomenological Predictions from Cognitive Neuroscience.” Philosophical Psychology 18: 527–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, Tim. 2013. The Objects of Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dretske, Fred. 1995. Naturalizing the Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dretske, Fred. 1999. “The Mind's Awareness of Itself.” Philosophical Studies 75: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Ffytche, D. H. 2008. “The Hodology of Hallucinations.” Cortex 44: 1067–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ffytche, D. H. and R. J. Howard. 1999. “The Perceptual Consequences of Visual Loss: ‘Postive’ pathologies of Vision.” Brain 122: 1247–1260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, Jerry A. 1987. Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• French, Craig, and Anil Gomes. 2019. “How Naive Realism Can Explain Both the Particularity and the Generality of Experience.” Philosophical Quarterly 69 (274): 41–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, Joseph, and Ali Rezaei. 2020. “When Nothing Looks Blue.” In Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02899-3.
   Google Scholar
• Grzankowski, Alex. 2013. “Non-Propositional Attitudes.” Philosophy Compass 8 (12): 1123–1137.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Carsten, and Georges Rey. 2016. “Files and Singular Thoughts Without Objects Or Acquaintance: The Prospects of Recanati's ‘Actualism’.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (2): 421–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, Christopher. 2019. “Perceptual Existentialism Sustained.” Erkenntnis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-019-00160-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurvich, Leo. 1981. Color Vision. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Mark. 2004. “The Obscure Object of Hallucination.” Philosophical Studies 120 (1–3): 113–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriegel, Uriah. 2007. “Intentional Inexistence and Phenomenal Intentionality.” Philosophical Perspectives 21 (1): 307–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1999/1983. “Individuation by Acquaintance and by Stipulation.” In Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lycan, William G. 1987. “Phenomenal Objects: A Backhanded Defense.” Philosophical Perspectives 1: 513–526.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. G. F. 2004. “The Limits of Self-Awareness.” Philosophical Studies 120 (1–3): 37–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masrour, F. 2020. “On the Possibility of Hallucinations.” Mind 129 (515): 737–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, John. 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGinn, Colin. 1982. The Character of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, Neil. 2014. “The Limited Role of Particulars in Phenomenal Experience.” Journal of Philosophy111 (6): 311–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millikan, R. G. 1984. Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montague, Michelle. 2016. The Given: Experience and its Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newall, Michael. 2009. “Pictorial Experience and Seeing.” British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (2): 129–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pautz, Adam. 2007. “Intentionalism and Perceptual Presence.” Philosophical Perspectives 21 (1): 495–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei, Ali. ms. The Particularity and Objectual Unity of Visual Experience.
   Google Scholar
• Schellenberg, Susanna. 2010. “The Particularity and Phenomenology of Perceptual Experience.” Philosophical Studies 149 (1): 19–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellenberg, Susanna. 2011. “Ontological Minimalism About Phenomenology.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (1): 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellenberg, Susanna. 2018. The Unity of Perception: Content, Consciousness, Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, Eric. 2014. “The Crazyist Metaphysics of Mind.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (4): 665–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. D. 2002. The Problem of Perception. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tye, Michael. 2000. Consciousness, Color, and Content. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tye, Michael. 2014a. “Transparency, Qualia Realism and Representationalism.” Philosophical Studies170: 39–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye, Michael. 2014b. “Speaks on Strong Property Representationalism.” Philosophical Studies 170 (1): 85–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye, Michael. 2014c. “What is the Content of a Hallucinatory Experience?” In Does Perception have Content?, edited by Berit Brogaard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tye, Michael. 2019a. “How to Think about the Representational Content of Visual Experience.” In The Philosophy of Perception, Proceedings of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, edited by Christoph Limbeck. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Tye, Michael. 2019b. “What Uninformed Mary Can Teach Us.” In The Knowledge Argument, edited by Sam Coleman, 269–280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, Timothy. 2013. Modal Logic as Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W. 2014. Attention. New Problems of Philosophy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar