References
- Blackburn, S. 1971. “Moral Realism.” In Morality and Moral Reasoning, edited by J. Casey, 101–124. London: Methuen.
- Blackburn, S. 1984. Spreading the Word: Groundings in the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.
- Blackburn, S. 1993. Essays in Quasi-Realism. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Boyd, R. 1988. “How to be a Moral Realist.” In Essays on Moral Realism, edited by G. Sayre-McCord, 181–228. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
- Dreier, J. 1992. “The Supervenience Argument Against Moral Realism.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (3): 13–38.
- Dreier, J. 2015. “Explaining the Quasi-Real.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 10, edited by R. Shafer-Landau, 273–298. Oxford University Press.
- Dreier, J. 2019. “Is There a Supervenience Problem for Robust Moral Realism?” Philosophical Studies 176 (6): 1391–1408.
- Enoch, D. 2011. Taking Morality Seriously. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Foot, P. 2001. Natural Goodness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gibbard, A. 2003. Thinking how to Live (1. Paperback ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Hare, R. M. 1963/1952. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hare, R. M. 1984. “Supervenience.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 58 (1): 1–16.
- Horgan, T., and M. Timmons. 1992. “Troubles on Moral Twin Earth: Moral Queerness Revived.” Synthese 92 (2): 221–260.
- Leary, S. 2017. “Non-naturalism and Normative Necessities.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, edited by R. Shafer-Landau, Vol. 12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lewis, D. K. 2001. Counterfactuals. Rev. ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
- MacFarlane, J. 2014. Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and Its Applications. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- McPherson, T. 2012. “Ethical Non-Naturalism and the Metaphysics of Supervenience.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics Volume 7, edited by R. Shafer-Landau, 205–234. Oxford University Press.
- McPherson, T. 2015. “Supervenience in Ethics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2015), edited by E. N. Zalta. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/supervenience-ethics/.
- Mitchell, C. 2017. “Mixed Up About Mixed Worlds? Understanding Blackburn’s Supervenience Argument.” Philosophical Studies 174: 2903–2925.
- Ninan, D. 2010. “Semantics and the Objects of Assertion.” Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (5): 355–380.
- Sibley, F. 1965. “Aesthetic and Nonaesthetic.” The Philosophical Review 74 (2): 135–159.
- Skarsaune, K. O. 2015. “How to be a Moral Platonist.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 10, edited by R. Shafer-Landau, 245–272. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Sturgeon, N. 2009. “Doubts About the Supervenience of the Ethical.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics: Volume Four, edited by R. Shafer-Landau. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Yalcin, S. 2014. “Semantics and Metasemantics in the Context of Generative Grammar.” In Metasemantics, edited by A. Burgess, and B. Sherman, 17–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Yalcin, S. 2018. “Expressivism by Force.” In New Work on Speech Acts, edited by D. Fogal, D. W. Harris, and M. Moss. Oxford: Oxford University Press.