Pure-Tone Acuity, Speech-Hearing Ability And Deafness In Acoustic Trauma

References

• Acton W. I. Speech intelligibility in a background noise and noise-induced hearing loss. Ergonomics 1970; 13: 546–554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley W. C. The national health survey: hearing study series bulletin No. 2. US Public Health Service, Washington 1938
   Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld V. G., Bergman M., Millner E. Speech discrimination in an aging population. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1969; 12: 210–217
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bunch C. C. The development of the audiometer. Laryngoscope 1941; 51: 1100–1118
   Google Scholar
• Carhart R. Speech reception in relation to pattern of pure-tone loss. J. Speech and Hearing Dis. 1946; 11: 97–108
   Google Scholar
• Cawthorne T., Harvey R. M. A comparison between hearing for pure tones and for speech. J. Laryng, Otol. 1953; 67: 233–247
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curry E. T. A study of the relationship between speech thresholds and audiometric results in perception deafness. J. Speech and Hearing Dis. 1949; 14: 104–110
   Google Scholar
• Davis H. The articulation area and the social adequacy index for hearing. Laryngoscope 1948; 58: 761–778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H., Silverman S. R. Hearing and deafness, rev. ed. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, London 1960
   Google Scholar
• Dewey G. Relative frequency of english speech sounds. Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1923
   Google Scholar
• Dix M. R., Hallpike C. S., Hood J. D. Observations upon the loudness recruitment phenomenon, with especial reference to the differential diagnosis of disorders of the internal ear and VIII nerve. Proc. roy. Soc. Med. 1948; 41: 516–526
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Egan J. P. Articulation testing methods. Laryngoscope 1948; 58: 955–991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott L. L. Prediction of speech-discrimination scores from other test information. J. Auditory Res. 1963; 3: 35–45
   Google Scholar
• Elliott L. L. Note on predicting speech discrimination scores. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1964; 36: 1961–1962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelberg M. Relationship of pure tones to speech reception threshold. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryng., St. Louis 1965; 74: 234–240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. Speech and hearing. Van Nostrand, New York 1929
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. A method of calculating hearing loss for speech from an audiogram. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1950; 22: 1–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher H., Steinberg J. C. Articulation testing methods. Bell Syst. tech. J. 1929; 8: 806–854
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher H., Wegel R. L. Audiometric methods and their applications. Trans. amer. laryng. rhinol. otol. Soc. 1922; 1941, quoted by Bunch
   Google Scholar
• Fowler E. P. A method for the early detection of otosclerosis. Arch. Otolaryng. 1936; 24: 731–741
   Google Scholar
• Fowler E. P. Hearing standards for acceptance, disability rating and discharge in the military services and in industry. Larngoscope 1941; 51: 937–956
   Google Scholar
• Fowler E. P. A simple method for measuring percentage of capacity for hearing speech. Arch. Otolaryng. 1942; 36: 870–890
   Google Scholar
• Fowler E. P. The percentage of capacity to hear speech and related disabilities. Laryngoscope 1947; 57: 103–113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French N. R., Steinberg J. C. Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1947; 19: 90–119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjaevenes K. Estimating speech reception threshold from pure-tone hearing loss. J. Auditory Res. 1969; 9: 139–144
   Google Scholar
• Goldman J. L. A comparative study of whisper test and audiograms. Laryngoscope 1944; 54: 559–572
   Google Scholar
• Graham J. T. Evaluation of methods for predicting speech reception threshold. Arch. Otolaryng. 1960; 72: 347–350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris J. D. Pure-tone acuity and the intelligibility of everyday speech. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1965; 37: 824–830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris J. D., Haines H. L., Myers C. K. A new formula for using the audiogram to predict speech hearing loss. Arch. Otolaryng. 1956; 63: 158–176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris J. D., Haines H. L., Myers C. K. The importance of hearing at 3 kc for understanding speeded speech. Laryngoscope 1960; 70: 131–146
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• High W. S., Fairbranks G., Glorig A. Scale for self-assessment of hearing handicap. J. Speech and Hearing Dis. 1964; 29: 215–230
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirsh I. J., Davis H., Silverman S. R., Reynolds E. G., Eldert E., Benson R. W. Development of materials for speech audiometry. J. Speech and Hearing Dis. 1952; 17: 321–337
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hood J. D. A comparative study of loudness recruitment in cases of deafness due to Miniére's disease, head injury and acoustic trauma. Acta oto-rhino-laryng, belg. 1960; 3: 224–233
   Google Scholar
• Hood J. D., Poole J. P. Speech audiometry in conductive and sensorineural hearing loss. Sound 1971; 5: 30–38
   Google Scholar
• Hudgins C. V., Hawkins J. E., Hawkins J. E., Karlin J. E., Stevens S. S. The development of recorded auditory tests for measing hearingt loss for speech. Laryngoscope 1947; 57: 57–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughson W., Thompson E. Correlation of hearing acuity for speech with discrete frequency audiograms. Arch. Otolaryng. 1942; 36: 526–540
   Google Scholar
• Huizing H. C., Reyntjes J. A. Recruitment and speech discrimination loss. Laryngoscope 1952; 62: 521–527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight J. J. Redetermination of optimum characteristics for a hearing aid with insert earphone. Int. Audiol. 1967; 6: 322–326
   Google Scholar
• Kryter K. D., Williams C., Green D. M. Auditory acuity and the perception of speech. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1962; 34: 1217–1223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenbeck B. Textbook of practical audiometry. E. Arnold, London 1965
   Google Scholar
• Licklider J. C. R., Pollack I. Effects of differentiation, integration, and infinite peak clipping upon the intellibility of speech. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1948; 20: 42–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindeman H. E. Results of speech intelligibility survey in cases of noise traumata. Int. Audiol. 1969a; 8: 626–632
   Google Scholar
• Lindeman H. E. The influence of visual speech reception (lipreading) on the result of the industrial speech audiogram and the relation with the pure-tone audiogram. Int. Audiol. 1969b; 8: 651
   Google Scholar
• Meyer zum Gottesberge A., Plath P. Statistical investigation on speech discrimination in noise-induced hearing loss. Int. Audiol. 1967; 6: 15–17
   Google Scholar
• Miller G. A. Language and communication. McGraw-Hill, New York 1951
   Google Scholar
• Miller G. A., Heise G., Lichten W. The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. J. exp. Psychol. 1951; 41: 329–335
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mullins C. J., Bangs J. L. Relationships between speech discrimination and other audiometric data. Acta oto-laryng., Stockh. 1957; 47: 149–157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Niemeyer W. Speech discrimination in noise-induced deafness. Int. Audiol. 1967; 6: 42–47
   Google Scholar
• Noble W. G. A scale for the measurement of hearing loss and disability. doct. Thesis, Manchester 1969
   Google Scholar
• Noble W. G., Atherley G. R. C. The hearing measurement scale: a questionnaire for the assessment of auditory disability. J. Auditory Res. 1970; 10: 229–250
   Google Scholar
• Palva T. Finnish speech audiometry: methods and clinical applications. Acta otolaryng., Stockh., Suppl. 1952; 101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palva T. Studies of hearing for pure tones and speech in noise. Acta oto-laryng., Stockh. 1955; 45: 231–243
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pestalozza G., Lazzaroni A. Noise effects on speech perception in clinical and experimental types of deafness. Acta oto-laryng., Stockh. 1954; 44: 350–358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestalozza G., Shore I. Clinical evaluation of presbyacusis on the basis of different tests of auditory function. Laryngoscope 1955; 65: 1136–1163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guiggle R. R., Glorig A., Delk J. H., Summerfield A. B. Predicting hearing loss for speech from pure-tone audiograms. Laryngoscope 1957; 67: 1–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guist-Hanssen S., Steen E. Obseved aqnd calculated hearing loss for speech in noise-induced deafness. Acta oto-laryng., Stockh., Suppl. 1960; 158: 277–281
   Google Scholar
• Ross M., Huntington D. A., Newby H. A., Dixon R. F. Speech discrimination of hearing-impaired individuals in noise. J. Auditory Res. 1965; 5: 47–72
   Google Scholar
• Siegenthaler B. M. A study of the relationship between measured hearing loss and intelligibility of selected words. J. Speech and Hearing Dis. 1949; 14: 111–118
   Google Scholar
• Silverman S. R., Hirsch I. J. Problems related to the use of speech in clinical audiometry. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryng., St. Louis 1955; 64: 1234–1244
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silverman S. R., Thurlow W. R., Walsh T. E., Davis H. Improvement in the social adequacy of hearing following the fenestration operation. Laryngoscope 1948; 58: 607–631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speaks C., Jerger J., Trammell J. Measurement of hearing handicap. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1970; 13: 768–776
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steinberg J. C., Gardner M. B. Dependence of hearing impairment on sound intensity. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1937; 9: 11–23
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg J. C., Gardner M. B. On the auditory significance of the term hearing loss. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1940; 11: 270–277
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike E. L. A teacher's word book. Columbia University Press, New York 1932
   Google Scholar
• Walsh T. E., Silverman S. R. Diagnosis and evaluation of fenestration. Laryngoscope 1946; 56: 536–555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster J. C. Important frequencies in noise-masked speech. Arch. Otolaryng. 1964; 80: 494–504
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webster I. C. The auditory pathway. E. Arnold, London 1967
   Google Scholar
• Young M. A., Gibbons E. W. Speech discrimination scores and threshold measurements in a non-normal hearing population. J. Auditory Res. 1962; 2: 21–33
   Google Scholar
• Zangemeister von H. E. Über den Lautstärkeausgleich. Acta oto-laryng., Stockh. 1950; 38: 484–495
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zarcoff M. Correlation of filtered, band-limited while noise and the speech reception thresh old. Arch. Otolaryng. 1958; 68: 372–381
   Google Scholar