The use of High-Pass amplification for Broad-Frequency sensorineural hearing loss

References

• Berland O., Nielsen E. Sound pressure generated in the human external ear by a free sound field. Audecibel 1969; Summer: 103–109
   Google Scholar
• Brooks D. Gain requirements of hearing aid users. Scand. Audiol. 1973; 2: 199–205
   Google Scholar
• Bryant H. W. Comparable coupler and real-ear measurements on supraaural and insert type earphones. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1972; 52: 1599–1606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne D. J. Some implications of body baffle for hearing aid selection. Sound 1972; 6: 86–91
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Electro-Acoustics. Hearing aids and audiometers. London, Medical Research Council, Spec. Rep. Ser., No. 261. HMS Office, London 1947
   Google Scholar
• Danaher E. M., Osberger M. J., Picett J. M. Discrimination of formant frequency transitions in synthetic vowels. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1973; 16: 439–451
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis H., Stevens S. S., Nichols R. H., jr. Hearing aids. An experimental study of design objectives. Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1947
   Google Scholar
• Djupesland G., Zwislocki J. J. Sound pressure distribution in the outer ear. Acta oto-lar. 1973; 75: 350–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds E., Harford E. Modified ear pieces and CROS for high-frequency hearing losses. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1968; 11: 204–218
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erber N. P. Variables that influence sound pressures generated in the ear canal by an audiometric earphone. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1968; 44: 555–562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erber N. P. Body-baffle and real-ear effects in the selection of hearing aids for deaf children. J. Speech and Hearing Dis. 1973; 38: 224–231
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frank T., Karlovich R. S. Ear canal frequency response and speech discrimination performance as a function of earmold type. J. audit. Res. 1973; 13: 124–129
   Google Scholar
• French N. R., Steinberg J. C. Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 1947; 19: 90–119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green D. S., Ross M. The effect of a conventional versus a non-occluding (CROS-type) earmold upon the frequency response of a hearing aid. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1968; 11: 638–647
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harford E., Barry J. A rehabilitative approach to the problem of unilateral hearing impairment: the contralateral routing of signals (CROS). J. Speech and Hearing Dis. 1965; 30: 121–138
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrison A. Clinical uses of earmold modifications in supplying amplification to a presbycusic population. Int. Aud. 1969; 8: 509–516
   Google Scholar
• Harrison A. The use of high frequency response hearing aids with moderate to severe hearing losses. Audecibel 1974; 23: 137–144
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson W. R., Murdock C. Effect of the earmold on speech intelligibility in hearing aid use. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1970; 13: 290–297
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jetty A. J., Rintelmann W. F. Acoustic coupler effects on speech audiometric scores using a CROS hearing aid. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1970; 13: 101–114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lybarger S. F. Earmold acoustics. Audecibel 1967; Winter: 9–19
   Google Scholar
• Martin E. S., Pickett J. M. Sensorineural hearing loss and upward spread of masking. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1970; 13: 426–437
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCandless G. A. Special considerations in evaluating children and the aging for hearing aids; in Rubin Hearing Aids. University Park Press. 1976
   Google Scholar
• McClellan M. E. Aided speech discrimination in noise with vented and unvented earmolds. J. audit. Res. 1967; 7: 93–99
   Google Scholar
• McDonald F. D., Studebaker G. A. Earmold alteration effects as measured in the human auditory meatus. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1970; 48: 1366–1372
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller G. A. The masking of speech. Psychol. Bull. 1947; 44: 105–129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller J. D. Possible importance of head-diffraction and ear canal resonance for speech perception and hearing aid design. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1974; 55: 462(A)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen W., Carhart R. Head diffraction effects on ear-level hearing aids. Audiology 1975; 14: 244–258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen W. O., Wilbur S. A. Physical performance characteristics of different hearing aids and speech discrimination scores achieved with them by hearing-impaired persons. Proc. ASHA Convention 1967
   Google Scholar
• Pascoe D. P. Frequency responses of hearing aids and their effects on the speech perception of hearing impaired subjects. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 1975; 84(Suppl. 23)5
   Google Scholar
• Ruhm H. B. Speech discrimination in low frequency noise; PhD diss. Evanston 1959
   Google Scholar
• Sachs R. M., Burkhard M. D. Earphone pressure response in ears and couplers. Proc. 83rd Meet. Acoust. Soc. Am., Buffalo 1972
   Google Scholar
• Shaw E. A.G. Ear canal pressure generated by a free sound field. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1966; 39: 465–470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker G. A. The acoustical effect of various factors on the frequency response of a hearing aid receiver. J. Aud. Eng. Soc. 1974; 22: 329–334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker G. A., Zachman T. A. Investigation of the acoustics of earmold vents. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1970; 47: 1107–1115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillman T. W., Carhart R. An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words (NU auditory test No. 6). Sch. Aerospace med., tech. Res. 1966; 65/66: 1–12
   Google Scholar
• Tonisson W. Measuring in-the-ear gain of hearing aids by the acoustic reflex method. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1975; 18: 17–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wisniewsky W. H. Measurement of the electroacoustical characteristics of hearing aids. J. audiol. Tech. 1970; 9: 152–170
   Google Scholar