181
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Stabilizing Posture Through Imagery

Stabilisierung der Haltung durch Bilder

Stabilisation de la posture grâce à l’imagerie

Estabilización de la postura a través de la visualización

, &
Pages 292-309 | Received 09 Apr 2013, Accepted 23 Apr 2013, Published online: 16 May 2014

References

  • Angelaki, D. E., Gu, Y., & DeAngelis, G. C. (2009). Multisensory integration: Psychophysics, neurophysiology, and computation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19, 452–458.
  • Aon, E. C., McIsaac, T., & Nilsen, D. (2012). Effects of kinesthetic versus visual imagery practice on two technical dance movements: A pilot study. Journal of Dance Medicine & Science, 16, 36–38.
  • Balasubramaniam, R., & Wing, A. M. (2002). The dynamics of standing balance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 531–536.
  • Boudrahem, S., & Rougier, P. R. (2009). Relation between postural control assessment with eyes open and centre of pressure visual feedback effects in healthy individuals. Experimental Brain Research, 95, 145–152.
  • Bove, M., Bonzano, L., Trompetto, C., Abbruzzese, G., & Schieppati, M. (2006). The postural disorientation induced by neck muscle vibration subsides on lightly touching a stationary surface or aiming at it. Neuroscience, 143, 1095–1103.
  • Bove, M., Fenoggio, C., Tacchino, A., Pelosin, E., & Schieppati, M. (2009). Interaction between vision and neck proprioception in the control of stance. Neuroscience, 164, 1601–1608.
  • Caratelli, E., Menzocchi, M., Carli, G., Fontani, G., & Santarcangelo, E. (2010). Is high hypnotizability a trouble in balance control? European Journal of Applied Physiology, 108, 201–206.
  • Carli, G., Cavallaro, F. I., Rendo, C. A., & Santarcangelo, E. L. (2007). Imagery of different sensory modalities: Hypnotizability and body sway. Experimental Brain Research, 179, 147–154.
  • Carli, G., Cavallaro, F. I., & Santarcangelo, E. L. (2007). Hypnotizability and imagery modality preference: Do highs and lows live in the same world? Contemporary Hypnosis, 24, 64–75.
  • Carli, G., Manzoni, D., & Santarcangelo, E. L. (2008). Hypnotizability-related integration of perception and action. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 1065–1076.
  • Clapp, S., & Wing, A. M. (1999). Light touch contribution to balance in normal bipedal stance. Experimental Brain Research, 125, 521–524.
  • De Nunzio, A. M., Nardone, A., & Schieppati, M. (2005). Head stabilization on a continuously oscillating platform: The effect of a proprioceptive disturbance on the balancing strategy. Experimental Brain Research, 165, 261–272.
  • De Pascalis, V., Bellusci, A., & Russo, P. M. (2000). Italian norms for the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 48, 315–333.
  • Fraizer, E. V., & Mitra, S. (2008). Methodological and interpretive issues in posture-cognition dual-tasking in upright stance. Gait Posture, 27, 271–279.
  • Gir, E. C., McIsaac, T., & Nilsen, D. (2012). Effects of kinesthetic versus visual imagery practice on two technical dance movements: A pilot study. Journal of Dance Medicine & Science, 16(1), 36–38.
  • Golomer, E. M., Gravenhorst, R. M., & Toussaint, Y. (2009). Influence of vision and motor imagery styles on equilibrium control during whole-body rotations. Somatosensory and Motor Research, 26(4), 105–110.
  • Grangeon, M., Guillot, A., & Collet, C. (2011). Postural control during visual and kinesthetic motor imagery. Applied Psychophysiology & Biofeedback, 36, 47–56.
  • Green, J. P., Barabasz, A. F., Barrett, D., & Montgomery, G. H. (2005). Forging ahead: The 2003 APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53, 259–264.
  • Green, J. P., & Lynn, S. J. (2011). Hypnotic responsiveness: Expectancy, attitudes, fantasy proneness, absorption, and gender. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 59, 103–121.
  • Guerraz, M., & Day, B. L. (2005). Expectation and the vestibular control of balance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 463–469.
  • Guillot, A., Collet, C., Nguyen, V. A., Malouin, F., Richards, C., &.Doyon, J. (2009). Brain activity during visual vs. kinesthetic imagery: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 2157–2172.
  • Huxhold, O., Li, S. C., Schmiedek, F., & Lindenberger, U. (2006). Dual-tasking postural control: Aging and the effects of cognitive demand in conjunction with focus of attention. Brain Research Bulletin, 69, 294–305.
  • Jeka, J. J., & Lackner, J. R. (1994). Fingertip contact influences human postural control. Experimental Brain Research, 100, 495–502.
  • Kammermeier, S., Kleine, J., & Büttner, U. (2009). Vestibular-neck interaction in cerebellar patients. Annals of New York Academy of Science, 1164, 394–399.
  • Kouzaki, M., & Masani, K. (2008). Reduced postural sway during quiet standing by light touch is due to finger tactile feedback but not mechanical support. Experimental Brain Research, 188, 153–158.
  • Lacour, M., Bernard-Demanze, L., & Dumitrescu, M. (2008). Posture control, aging, and attention resources: Models and posture-analysis methods. Clinical Neurophysiology, 38, 411–421.
  • Lorey, B., Pilgramm, S., Bischoff, M., Stark, R., Vaitl, D., Kindermann, S.,… Zentgraf, K. (2011). Activation of the parieto-premotor network is associated with vivid motor imagery: A parametric FMRI study. PLoS One, 6(5), e20368. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020368
  • Manckoundia, P., Pfitzenmeyer, P., d’Athis, P., Dubost, V., & Mourey, F. (2006). Impact of cognitive task on the posture of elderly subjects with Alzheimer’s disease compared to healthy elderly subjects. Movement Disorders, 21, 236–241.
  • Manzoni, D. (2005). The cerebellum may implement the appropriate coupling of sensory inputs and motor responses: Evidence from vestibular physiology. Cerebellum, 4, 178–188.
  • Mecacci, G., Menzocchi, M., Zeppi, A., Carli, G., & Santarcangelo, E. L. (2013). Body sway modulation by hypnotizability and gender during low and high demanding postural conditions. Archives Italiennes de Biolologie, 51(3), 99–105.
  • Oie, K. S., Kiemel, T., & Jeka, J. J. (2002). Multisensory fusion: Simultaneous reweighting of vision and touch for the control of human posture. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 164–176.
  • Olivier, I., Cuisinier, R., Vaugoyeau, M., Nougier, V., & Assaiante, C. (2007). Dual-task study of cognitive and postural interference in 7-year-olds and adults. Neuroreport, 18, 817–821.
  • Olivier, I., Cuisinier, R., Vaugoyeau, M., Nougier, V., & Assaiante, C. (2010). Age-related differences in cognitive and postural dual-task performance. Gait Posture, 32, 494–499.
  • Olsson, C. J., Jonsson, B., Larsson, A., & Nyberg, L. (2008). Motor representations and practice affect brain systems underlying imagery: An FMRI study of internal imagery in novices and active high jumpers. Open Neuroimaging Journal, 2, 5–13.
  • Pekala, R. J., & Forbes, E. J. (1997). Types of hypnotically (un)susceptible individuals as a function of phenomenological experience: Towards a typology of hypnotic types. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 39, 212–224.
  • Pellecchia, G. L. (2003). Postural sway increases with attentional demands of concurrent cognitive tasks. Gait and Posture, 18, 29–34.
  • Ravaioli, E., Oie, K. S., Kiemel, T., Chiari, L., & Jeka, J. J. (2005). Nonlinear postural control in response to visual translation. Experimental Brain Research, 160, 450–459.
  • Reynolds, R. (2010). The effects of voluntary sway control on the early and late components of the vestibular-evoked postural responses Experimental Brain Research, 201, 133–139.
  • Rodrigues, E. C., Imbiriba, L. A., Leite, G. R., Magahlaes, J., Volchan, E., & Vargas, C. D. (2003). Mental simulation strategy affects postural control. Review Brasileiro de Psiquiatria, 25, 33–35.
  • Rodrigues, E. C., Lemos, T., Goueva, B., Volchan, E., Imbiriba, L. A., & Vargas, C. D. (2010). Kinesthetic motor imagery modulates body sway. Neuroscience, 169, 743–750.
  • Ruby, P., & Decety, J. (2001). Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A PET investigation of agency. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 546–550.
  • Santarcangelo, E. L. (2011). The role of hypnotizability in the construction of individual sensori-motor selves. Archives Italiennes de Biologie, 149( Suppl. 4), 152–160.
  • Santarcangelo, E. L., Scattina, E., Carli, G., Ghelarducci, B., Orsini, P., & Manzoni, D. (2010). Can imagery become reality? Experimental Brain Research, 206, 329–335.
  • Santarcangelo, E. L., Scattina, E., Carli, G., Macerata, A., & Manzoni, D. (2008). Hypnotizability-dependent-modulation of postural control: Effects of alteration of the visual and leg proprioceptive inputs. Experimental Brain Research, 191, 331–340.
  • Santarcangelo, E. L., Scattina, E., Orsini, P., Bruschini, L., Ghelarducci, B., & Manzoni, D. (2008). Effects of vestibular and neck proprioceptive stimulation on posture as a function of hypnotizability. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 56, 170–184.
  • Scattina, E., Huber, A., Menzocchi, M., Paoletti, G., Carli, G., Manzoni, D., & Santarcangelo, E. L. (2012). Postural effects of imagined leg pain as a function of hypnotizability. Experimental Brain Research, 216(3), 341–348.
  • Schieppati, M., Tacchini, E., Nardone, A., Tarantola, J., & Corna, S. (1999). Subjective perception of body sway. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 66, 313–322.
  • Sirigu, A., & Duhamel, J. R. (2001). Motor and visual imagery as two complementary but neutrally dissociable mental processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 910–919.
  • Solodkin, A., Hlustik, P., Chen, E. E., & Small, S. L. (2004). Fine modulation in network activation during motor execution and motor imagery. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 1246–1255.
  • Sozzi, S., Do, M. C., Monti, A., & Schieppati, M. (2012). Sensorimotor integration during stance: processing time of active or passive addition or withdrawal of visual or haptic information. Neuroscience, 212, 59–76.
  • Stinear, C. M., Byblow, W. D., Steyvers, M., Levin, O., & Swinnen, S. P. (2006). Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability. Experimental Brain Research, 68, 157–164.
  • Terhune, D. B., Cardeña, E., & Lindgren, M. (2011). Dissociated control as a signature of typological variability in high hypnotic suggestibility. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 727–736.
  • Vuillerme, N., & Vincent, H. (2006). How performing a mental arithmetic task modify the regulation of centre of foot pressure displacements during bipedal quiet standing. Experimental Brain Research, 169, 130–134.
  • Woody, E. Z., Barnier, A. J., & McConkey, K. M. (2005). Multiple hypnotizabilities: Differentiating the building blocks of hypnotic response. Psychological Assessment, 17, 200–211.
  • Woollacott, M., & Shumway-Cook, A. (2002). Attention and the control of posture and gait: A review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture, 16, 1–14.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.