References
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Alman, B. M., & Wexler, D. (1988). Alman–Wexler Indirect Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale (AWIHSS). In G. J. Pratt, D. P. Wood, & B. M. Alman (Eds.), A clinical hypnosis primer: Expanded and updated (pp. 379–388). New York, NY: John Wiley.
- Barabasz, A., Barabasz, M., Jensen, S., Calvin, S., Trevisan, M., & Warner, D. (1999). Cortical event-related potentials show the structure of hypnotic suggestions is crucial. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47, 5–22. doi:10.1080/00207149908410019
- Barber, T. X. (2000). A deeper understanding of hypnosis: Its secrets, its nature, its essence. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 42, 208–272. doi:10.1080/00029157.2000.10734361
- Barber, T. X., Spanos, N. P., & Chaves, J. F. (1974). Hypnotism: Imagination and human potentialities. New York, NY: Pergamon.
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
- Bernstein, E. M., & Putnam, F. W. (1986). Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174, 727–735. doi:10.1097/00005053-198612000-00004
- Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Capafons, A., Cabañas, S., Espejo, B., & Cardeña, E. (2004). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Valencia scale on attitudes and beliefs toward hypnosis: An international study. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 52, 413–433. doi:10.1080/00207140490888432
- Chaves, J. F. (1999). Applying hypnosis in pain management: Implications of alternative theoretical perspectives. In I. Kirsch, A. Capafons, E. Cardena, & S. Amigo (Eds.), Clinical hypnosis and self-regulation: Cognitive-behavioral perspectives (pp. 227–247). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Council, J. R., Kirsch, I., & Hafner, L. P. (1986). Expectancy versus absorption in the prediction of hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 182–189. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.182
- Dowd, E. T., Milne, C. R., & Wise, S. L. (1991). The therapeutic reactance scale: A measure of psychological reactance. Journal of Counseling & Development, 69, 541–545. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1991.tb02638.x
- Dowd, E. T., Wallbrown, F., Sanders, D., & Yesenosky, J. M. (1994). Psychological reactance and its relationship to normal personality variables. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 18, 601–612. doi:10.1007/BF02355671
- Drake, S. D., Nash, M. R., & Cawood, G. N. (1990–1991). Imaginative involvement and hypnotic susceptibility: A re-examination of the relationship. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 10, 141–155. doi:10.2190/5K5R-H9EV-UFME-B62H
- Green, J. P. (2003). Beliefs about hypnosis: Popular beliefs, misconceptions, and the importance of experience. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 51, 369–381. doi:10.1076/iceh.51.4.369.16408
- Groth-Marnat, G., & Mitchell, K. (1998). Responsiveness to direct versus indirect hypnotic procedures: The role of resistance as a predictor variable. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 46, 324–333. doi:10.1080/00207149808410012
- Hilgard, J. R. (1970). Personality and hypnosis: A study of imaginative involvement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Jensen, S. M., Barabasz, A., Barabasz, M., & Warner, D. (2001). EEG P300 event-related markers of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 44, 127–139. doi:10.1080/00029157.2001.10403468
- Johnson, M. E., & Hauck, C. (1999). Beliefs and opinions about hypnosis held by the general public: A systematic evaluation. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 42, 10–20. doi:10.1080/00029157.1999.10404241
- Kasai, H., Shimizu, T., Tokuda, H., & Saito, T. (2003, September). Japanese norms for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Hypnosis, Fukuoka, Japan.
- Kirsch, I., & Council, J. R. (1992). Situational and personality correlates of hypnotic responsiveness. In E. Fromm & M. R. Nash (Eds.), Contemporary hypnosis research (pp. 267–291). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Kirsch, I., Council, J. R., & Wickless, C. (1990). Subjective scoring for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 38, 112–124. doi:10.1080/00207149008414506
- Lynn, S. J., & Kirsch, I. (2006). Essentials of clinical hypnosis: An evidence-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Lynn, S. J., Neufeld, V., & Maré, C. (1993). Direct versus indirect suggestions: A conceptual and methodological review. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 41, 124–152. doi:10.1080/00207149308414543
- McConkey, K. M. (1986). Opinions about hypnosis and self-hypnosis before and after hypnotic testing. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 34, 311–319. doi:10.1080/00207148608406996
- Melei, J. P., & Hilgard, E. R. (1964). Attitudes toward hypnosis, self-predictions, and hypnotic susceptibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 12, 99–108. doi:10.1080/00207146408409265
- Robin, B. R., Kumar, V. K., & Pekala, R. J. (2005). Direct and indirect scales of hypnotic susceptibility: Resistance to therapy and psychometric comparability. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53, 135–147. doi:10.1080/00207140590927617
- Shimizu, T. (2014). A causal model explaining the relationships governing beliefs, attitudes, and hypnotic responsiveness. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 62, 231–250. doi:10.1080/00207144.2014.869142
- Shimizu, T., & Kodama, M. (2001). The relation between notions of hypnotic states and attitudes toward hypnosis. Tsukuba Psychological Research, 23, 219–227.
- Shimizu, T., Tokuda, H., & Kasai, H. (2004, October). Experiential scoring for the Japanese version of the Waterloo-Stanford Group C Scale. Paper presented at the 16th International Congress on Hypnosis and Hypnotherapy, Suntec, Singapore.
- Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Spanos, N. P., Brett, P. J., Menary, E. P., & Cross, W. P. (1987). A measure of attitudes toward hypnosis: Relationships with absorption and hypnotic susceptibility. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 30, 139–150. doi:10.1080/00029157.1987.10404174
- Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 268–277. doi:10.1037/h0036681
- Wilson, S. C., & Barber, T. X. (1983). The fantasy-prone personality: Implications for understanding imagery, hypnosis, and parapsychological phenomena. In A. A. Sheikh (Ed.), Imagery: Current theory, research, and application (pp. 340–387). New York, NY: John Wiley.
- Yapko, M. D. (2003). Trancework: An introduction to the practice of clinical hypnosis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Brunner/Routledge.