References

• Collyer, C. E. (1981). The algebra and geometry of β. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 17, 61–62. doi:10.3758/BF03333668
   Google Scholar
• Cornsweet, T. N. (1962). The staircase method in psychophysics. American Journal of Psychology, 75, 485–491. doi:10.2307/1419876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. H., Macdonald, H., & Hilgard, E. R. (1979). Hypnotic deafness – Psychophysical study of responses to tone intensity as modified by hypnosis. American Journal of Psychology, 92, 193–214. doi:10.2307/1421920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfman, J., Kihlstrom, J. F., Cork, R. C., & Misiaszek, J. (1995). Priming and recognition in ECT-induced amnesia. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(2), 244–248. doi:10.3758/BF03210964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, J. P., & Clarke, F. R. (1966). Psychophysics and signal detection. In J. B. Sidowsky (Ed.), Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology (pp. 211–246). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Eiblmayr, K. (1987). Trance logic and the circle-touch test. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 15, 113–145.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, F. J., & Orne, M. T. (1965). Motivation, performance, and hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 13, 103–116. doi:10.1080/00207146508412932
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graham, C., & Leibowitz, H. W. (1972). The effect of suggestion on visual acuity. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 20, 169–186. doi:10.1080/00207147208409288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Herrick, R. M. (1973). Psychophysical methodology: VI. Random method of limits. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 548–554. doi:10.3758/BF03205818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgard, E. R. (1967). A quantitative study of pain and its reduction through hypnotic suggestion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 57, 1581–1586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgard, E. R. (1969). Pain as a puzzle for psychology and physiology. American Psychologist, 24, 103–113. doi:10.1037/h0027146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgard, E. R. (1973). A neodissociation interpretation of pain reduction in hypnosis. Psychological Review, 80, 396–411. doi:10.1037/h0020073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgard, E. R. (1977). Divided consciousness: Multiple controls in human thought and action. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgard, E. R., & Hilgard, J. R. (1975). Hypnosis in the relief of pain. Los Altos, CA: Kaufman.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, W., Johnson, M. K., Kim, J. K., Phelps, E. A., Risse, G., & Volpe, B. T. (1986). Recognition and recall in amnesics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 445–451. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.12.3.445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, W., Johnson, M. K., Phelps, E. A., & Volpe, B. T. (1988). More on recognition and recall with amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 758–762. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.4.758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodos, W. (1970). Nonparametric index of response bias for use in detection and recognition experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 351–354. doi:10.1037/h0029933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. R. (2000). Perception, awareness and action: Insights from blindsight. In Y. Rossetti & A. Revonsuo (Eds.), Beyond dissociation: Interaction between dissociated implicit and explicit processing (pp. 73–98). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513–541. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L., & Kelley, C. (1991). Unconscious influences of memory: Dissociations and automaticity. In D. Milner & M. Rugg (Eds.), The neuropsychology of consciousness (pp. 201–203). San Diego, CA: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Janet, P. (1907). The major symptoms of hysteria. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jesteadt, W. (1980). An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 85–88. doi:10.3758/BF03204321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B., & Spanos, N. P. (1982). Suggestions for altered auditory sensitivity, the negative subject effect, and hypnotic susceptibility: A signal-detection analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 637–647. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F. (1996). Perception without awareness of what is perceived, learning without awareness of what is learned. In M. Velmans (Ed.), The science of consciousness: Psychological, neuropsychological and clinical reviews (pp. 23–46). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F. (2012). Unconscious processes. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 176–186). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F., Barnhardt, T. M., & Tataryn, D. J. (1992). Implicit perception. In R. F. Bornstein & T. S. Pittman (Eds.), Perception without awareness: Cognitive, clinical, and social perspectives (pp. 17–54). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F., Dorfman, J., & Park, L. (2015). Conscious and unconscious memory. In S. Schneider & M. Velmans (Eds.), Blackwell companion to consciousness (2nd ed., pp. in press). Oxford, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1990). Response bias: Characteristics of detection theory, threshold theory, and nonparametric indexes. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 401–413. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252–271. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcel, A. J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 197–237. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90009-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz, J., & Swets, J. A. (1967). Factors affecting the slope of empirical ROC curves: Comparison of binary and rating responses. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 91–100. doi:10.3758/BF03210301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey, K. M., Bryant, R. A., Bibb, B. C., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1991). Trance logic in hypnosis and imagination. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 464–472. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.100.4.464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey, K. M., Bryant, R. A., Bibb, B. C., Kihlstrom, J. F., & Tataryn, D. J. (1990). Hypnotically suggested anaesthesia and the circle-touch test: A real-simulating comparison. British Journal of Experimental & Clinical Hypnosis, 7(3), 153–157.
   Google Scholar
• Merikle, P. M., & Reingold, E. M. (1990). Recognition and lexical decision without detection: Unconscious perception? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 574–583. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M. E., & Bowers, K. S. (1986). Hypnotic analgesia and stress inoculation in the reduction of pain. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 6–14. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.95.1.6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell, D. M. (1964). An experimental comparison of hypnotic depth measured by self-ratings and by an objective scale. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 12, 34–46. doi:10.1080/00207146408409256
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orne, M. T. (1959). The nature of hypnosis: Artifact and essence. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 277–299. doi:10.1037/h0046128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776–783. doi:10.1037/h0043424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orne, M. T. (1969). Demand characteristics and the concept of quasi-controls. In R. Rosenthal & R. Rosnow (Eds.), Artifact in behavioral research (pp. 143–179). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orne, M. T. (1979). On the simulating subject as a quasi-control group in hypnosis research: What, why, and how. In E. Fromm & R. E. Shor (Eds.), Hypnosis: Developments in research and new perspectives (pp. 519–565). New York, NY: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Pastore, R. E., & Scheirer, C. J. (1974). Signal detection theory: Considerations for general application. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 945–958. doi:10.1037/h0037357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, I., Norman, D. A., & Galanter, E. (1964). An efficient non-parametric analysis of recognition memory. Psychonomic Science, 1, 327–328. doi:10.3758/BF03342937
   Google Scholar
• Raz, A., Marinoff, G. P., Zephrani, Z. R., Schweizer, H. R., & Posner, M. I. (2004). See clearly: Suggestion, hypnosis, attention, and visual acuity. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 52, 159–187. doi:10.1076/iceh.52.2.159.28097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501–518. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulman, A. I., & Greenberg, G. Z. (1970). Operating characteristics and a priori probability of the signal. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 317–320. doi:10.3758/BF03212600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan, E. P., Smith, H. V., & Forrest, D. W. (1982). A signal-detection study of the effects of suggested improvement on the monocular visual acuity of myopes. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 30, 138–146. doi:10.1080/00207148208407379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan, P. W., & Perry, C. (1976). Methodologies of hypnosis: A critical appraisal of contemporary paradigms of hypnosis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, Form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.117.1.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos, N. P., Dubreuil, D. L., Saad, C. L., & Gorassini, D. (1983). Hypnotic elimination of prism-induced aftereffects: Perceptual effect or responses to experimental demands. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 216–222. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.92.2.216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swets, J. A., Tanner, W. P., & Birdsall, T. G. (1961). Decision processes in perception. Psychological Review, 68, 301–340. doi:10.1037/h0040547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tart, C. T. (1972). Measuring depth of an altered state of consciousness with particular reference to self-report scales of hypnotic depth. In E. Fromm & R. E. Shor (Eds.), Hypnosis: Research developments and perspectives. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.
   Google Scholar
• Tataryn, D. J. (1992). Psychophysical and signal detection analyses of hypnotic anesthesia. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304002023?accountid=14496
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, M. (1977). On the stability of ds. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 235–243. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.2.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, M., & Faulkner, A. (1984). The effect of signal probability on the slope of the receiver operating characteristic given by the rating procedure. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 37, 199–215. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1984.tb00800.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verfaellie, M., & Cermak, L. S. (1999). Perceptual fluency as a cue for recognition judgments in amnesia. Neuropsychology, 13(2), 198–205. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.13.2.198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verfaellie, M., Giovanello, K. S., & Keane, M. M. (2001). Recognition memory in amnesia: Effects of relaxing response criteria. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1(1), 3–9. doi:10.3758/CABN.1.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, B., & Garrett, J. B. (1973). Reduced felt arm sensation effects on visual adaptation. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 597–600. doi:10.3758/BF03211204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, C. S., & Clopton, D. M. (1969). Motivated changes of auditory sensitivity in a simple detection task. Perception & Psychophysics, 5, 281–287. doi:10.3758/BF03209563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiskrantz, L. (1986). Blindsight: A case study and implications. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale, Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilton, H. J., Barnier, A. J., & McConkey, K. M. (1997). Hypnotic anaesthesia and the circle-touch test: Investigating the components of the instructions. Contemporary Hypnosis, 14(1), 9–15. doi:10.1002/ch.79
   Google Scholar
• Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (2012). The process-dissociation approach two decades later: Convergence, boundary conditions, and new directions. Memory & Cognition, 40, 663–680. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0205-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, P. C. (1925). An experimental study of mental and physical functions in the normal and hypnotic states. American Journal of Psychology, 36, 214–232. doi:10.2307/1413859
   Google Scholar
• Young, P. C. (1926). An experimental study of mental and physical functions in the normal and hypnotic states: Additional results. American Journal of Psychology, 37, 345–356. doi:10.2307/1413621
   Google Scholar