References

• Angell, J. (1907). The province of functional psychology. The Psychological Review, 14, 61–91. doi:10.1037/h0070817
   Google Scholar
• Baars, B. J., & Gage, N. M. (2010). Cognition, brain, and consciousness: Introduction to cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed.). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Barabasz, A., & Watkins, J. G. (2005). Hypnotherapeutic techniques (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barabasz, A. F., & Barabasz, M. (2008). Hypnosis and the brain. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research and practice (pp. 337–363). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, T. X. (2000). A deeper understanding of hypnosis: Its secrets, its nature, its essence. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 42, 208–272. doi:10.1080/00029157.2000.10734361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnier, A. J., & McConkey, K. M. (2003). Hypnosis, human nature, and complexity: Integrating neuroscience approaches into hypnosis research. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 51, 282–308. doi:10.1076/iceh.51.3.282.15524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braffman, W., & Kirsch, I. (1999). Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability: An empirical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 578–587. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braid, J. (1843). Neurypnology: Or the rationale of nervous sleep considered in relation with animal magnetism. London, UK: John Churchill.
   Google Scholar
• Budzynski, R. H., Budzynski, H. K., Evans, J. R., & Abarbanel, A. (Eds.). (2009). Introduction to quantitative EEG and neurofeedback: Advanced theory and applications. Boston, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cardeña, E. A. (2005). The phenomenology of deep hypnosis: Quiescent and physically active. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53, 1–12. doi:10.1080/00207140490914234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardeña, E., & Pekala, R. J. (2014). Researching states of consciousness and anomalous experiences. In E. Cardeña, S. J. Lynn, & S. Krippner (Eds.), Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence (2nd ed., pp. 21–560). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Chatel, M., Balken, J., & Pekala, R. J. (2015, August). The phenomenology of consciousness inventory: Hypnotic assessment procedure (PCI-HAP): Traduction Francaise. Presentation given at the European Society of Hypnosis 20th World Congress, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Chiarucci, R., Madeo, D., Loffredo, M. I., Castellani, E., Santarcangelo, E. L., & Mocenni, C. (2014). Cross-evidence for hypnotic susceptibility through nonlinear measures on EEGs of non-hypnotized subjects. Scientific Reports, 8, 5610: 1–11. doi:10.1038/srep05610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collura, T. (2008). Towards a coherent view of brain connectivity. Journal of Neurotherapy, 12, 99–110. doi:10.1080/10874200802433274
   Google Scholar
• Council, J. R., Kirsch, I., & Grant, D. L. (1996). Imagination, expectancy, and hypnotic responding. In R. G. Kunzendorf, N. P. Spanos, & B. Wallace (Eds.), Hypnosis and imagination (pp. 41–66). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56(293), 52–64. doi:10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, G. (2014). Hypnotic relaxation therapy: Principles and applications. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, G., Barabasz, A. F., Council, J. R., & Spiegel, D. (2015). Advancing research and practice: The revised Division 30 definition of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 63, 1–9. doi:10.1080/00207144.2014.961870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, F. (1977). Hypnosis and sleep: The control of altered states of awareness. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 296, 162–175. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb38170.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fingelkurts, A. A., Fingelkurts, A. A., Bagnato, S., Boccagni, C., & Galardi, G. (2011). EEG oscillatory states as neuro-phenomenology of consciousness as revealed from patients in vegetative and minimally conscious states. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 149–169. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, E., & Pekala, R. J. (1993). Predicting hypnotic susceptibility via a phenomenological approach. Psychological Reports, 73, 1251–1256. doi:10.2466/pr0.1993.73.3f.1251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., & Lynn, S. L. (2010). Hypnotic responsiveness: Expectancy, attitudes, fantasy proneness, absorption, and gender. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 59(1), 103–121. doi:10.1080/00207144.2011.522914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, L. G., & Yarnold, R. R. (1995). Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gruzelier, J. H. (2000). Redefining hypnosis: Theory, methods, and integration. Contemporary Hypnosis, 17(2), 51–70. doi:10.1002/ch.193
   Google Scholar
• Hilgard, E. (1965). The experience of hypnosis. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Holroyd, J. (2003). The science of meditation and the state of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 46, 109–128. doi:10.1080/00029157.2003.10403582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, W. (1890/ 1950). The principles of psychology (Vols. 1 and 2). New York, NY: Dover Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, G. A., & Burgess, A. P. (2014). Hypnotic induction is followed by state-like changes in the organization of EEG functional connectivity in the theta and beta frequency bands in high-hypnotically susceptible individuals. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 24, 528: 1–19. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. (2003). The fox, the hedgehog, and hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 51, 166–189. doi:10.1076/iceh.51.2.166.14611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F. (2005). Is hypnosis an altered state of consciousness or what? Contemporary Hypnosis, 2, 34–38. doi:10.1002/ch.20
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I. (1985). Response expectancy as a determinant of experience and behavior. American Psychologist, 40, 1189–1202. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.40.11.1189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I. (1991). The social learning theory of hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Theories of hypnosis: Current models and perspectives (pp. 439–465). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., & Braffman, W. (1999). Correlates of hypnotizability: The first empirical study. Contemporary Hypnosis, 16, 224–230. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1557-0711
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., & Braffman, W. (2001). Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 57–61. doi:10.1111/cdir.2001.10.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., Silva, C. E., Comey, G., & Reed, S. (1995). A spectral analysis of cognitive and personality variables in hypnosis: Empirical disconfirmation of the two-factor model of hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 167–175. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, M., & Raz, A. (2015). Hypnosis and imaging of the living human brain. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57, 285–313. doi:10.1080/00029157.2014.978496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankton, S. (2015). A SoC model of hypnosis and induction. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57, 367–377. doi:10.1080/00029157.2015.1011461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCron, L. M. (1953). A method of measuring the depth of hypnosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1, 4–7. doi:10.1080/00207145308409812
   Google Scholar
• Lipari, S., Baglio, F., Griffanti, L., Mendozzi, L., Garegnani, M., Motta, A., … Pugnetti, L. (2012). Altered and asymmetric default mode network activity in a “hypnotic virtuoso”: An fMRI and EEG study. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 393–400. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, A., & Thompson, E. (2003). Neurophenomenology: Integrating subjective experience and brain dynamics in the neuroscience of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, 31–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Green, J. P., Kirsch, I., Capafons, A., Lilienfeld, S. O., Laurence, J.-R., & Montgomery, G. H. (2015). Grounding hypnosis in science: The “new” APA division 30 definition of hypnosis as a step backward. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57, 390–401. doi:10.1080/00029157.2015.1011472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., & Kirsch, I. (2006). Essentials of clinical hypnosis: An evidence-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• McGeown, W. J., Mazzoni, G., Venneri, A., & Kirsch, I. (2009). Hypnotic induction decreases anterior default mode activity. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 848–855. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, D. A. (2008). Hypnosis, trance and suggestion: Evidence from neuroimaging. In M. R. Nash and A. J. Barnier (Eds.), Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research and practice (pp. 365–392). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. W. (2009). Hypnotic suggestion and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(6), 264–270. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (1980). An empirical-phenomenological approach for mapping consciousness and its various “states ( Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University). 44 (University Microfilm No. 82-02, 489).
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (1982). The phenomenology of consciousness inventory. Thorndale, PA: Psychophenomenological Concepts. (Now published by Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute. See Pekala, 1991b).
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (1991a). Hypnotic types: Evidence from a cluster analysis of phenomenal experience. Contemporary Hypnosis, 8, 95–104.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (1991b). Quantifying consciousness: An empirical approach. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (1995a). A short unobtrusive hypnotic induction for assessing hypnotizability level: I. Development and research. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 37, 271–283. doi:10.1080/00029157.1995.10403156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (1995b). A short unobtrusive hypnotic induction for assessing hypnotizability: II. Clinical Case Reports. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 37, 284–293. doi:10.1080/00029157.1995.10403157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (2002). Operationalizing “trance”: II. Clinical application using a psychophenomenological approach. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 44, 241–255. doi:10.1080/00029157.2002.10403484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (2009a, October). The puzzles and perplexities of hypnotism: How phenomenology can help. Keynote address given at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, Reno, Nevada.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (2009b, October). Therapist’s manual: Interpretation of the phenomenology of consciousness inventory: Hypnotic assessment procedure (PCI-HAP). West Chester, PA. Unpublished manual.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (2014a, May). Phenomenological snapshots of the hypnotic mind: An overview. Invited address given to the Greater Philadelphia Society of Clinical Hypnosis, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (2014b, August). Quantifying the mind to better understand your client’s hypnotic talents. Presentation given at the American Psychological Association’s Annual Convention, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (2015). Hypnosis as a “state of consciousness:” How quantifying the mind can help us better understand hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57, 402–424. doi:10.1080/00029157.2015.1011480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (2016). The “mysteries of hypnosis”: Helping us better understand hypnosis and empathic involvement theory (EIT). American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 58, 274–285. doi:10.1080/00029157.2015.1101679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (2017). Addictions and relapse prevention. In G. R. Elkins (Ed.), Handbook of medical and psychological hypnosis: Foundations, applications, and professional issues. (pp. 443–451). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Forbes, E. J. (1997). Types of hypnotically (un)susceptible individuals as a function of phenomenological experience: Towards a typology of hypnotic types. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 39, 212–224. doi:10.1080/00029157.1997.10403386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (2000). Operationalizing “trance”: I. Rationale and research using a psychophenomenological approach. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 43, 107–135. doi:10.1080/00029157.2000.10404265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (2007). An empirical-phenomenological approach to quantifying consciousness and states of consciousness: With particular reference to understanding the nature of hypnosis. In G. Jamieson (Ed.), Towards a cognitive-neuroscience of hypnosis and conscious states: A resource for researchers, students, and clinicians (pp. 167–194). London, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., & Marcano, G. (1995). Hypnotic types: A partial replication concerning phenomenal experience. Contemporary Hypnosis, 12, 194–200.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., & Maurer, R. (2009b, October). The phenomenology of consciousness inventory: Hypnotic assessment procedure (PCI-HAP): Administrator’s manual. West Chester, PA. Unpublished manual.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., Maurer, R., Elliott-Carter, N., & Moon, E. (2006). “How deeply hypnotized did I get?” Predicting self-reported hypnotic depth from a phenomenological assessment instrument. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 54, 316–339. doi:10.1080/00207140600691344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., Maurer, R., Elliott-Carter, N., Moon, E., & Mullen, K. (2009). Positive affect, negative affect, and negative effects during a phenomenological hypnotic assessment within a substance abuse population. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 57, 64–93. doi:10.1080/00207140802463674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., Maurer, R., Elliott-Carter, N., Moon, E., & Mullen, K. (2010a). Suggestibility, expectancy, trance state effects, and hypnotic depth: I. Implications for understanding hypnotism. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 52, 271–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., Maurer, R., Elliott-Carter, N., Moon, E., & Mullen, K. (2010b). Suggestibility, expectancy, trance state effects, and hypnotic depth: II. Assessment via the PCI-HAP. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 52, 287–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Maurer, R. L. (2013). A cross-validation of two differing measures of hypnotic depth. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 61(1), 81–110. doi:10.1080/00207144.2013.729439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Nagler, R. (1989). The assessment of hypnoidal states: Rationale and clinical application. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 31, 231–236. doi:10.1080/00029157.1989.10402777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Wenger, C. F. (1983). Retrospective phenomenological assessment: Mapping consciousness in reference to specific stimulus conditions. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 4, 247–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintar, J., & Lynn, S. J. (2008). Hypnosis: A brief history. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska, J. P., & Norcross, J. C. (2014). Systems of psychotherapy: A transtheoretical analysis (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Rechtschaffen, A. (1994). Sleep onset: Conceptual issues. In R. D. Ogilvie & J. R. Harsh (Eds.), Sleep onset: Normal and abnormal processes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Schumaker, J. F. (Ed.). (1991). Human suggestibility: Advances in theory, research, and application. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, P. W. (1979). Hypnosis and the processes of imagination. In E. Fromm & R. E. Shor (Eds.), Hypnosis: Developments in research and new perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 381–411). New York, NY: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). The Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel, H., & Spiegel, H. (2004). Trance and treatment: Clinical uses of hypnosis (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terhune, D. B., & Cardeña, E. (2010a). Differential patterns of spontaneous experiential response to a hypnotic induction; A latent profile analysis. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 1140–1150. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terhune, D. B., & Cardeña, E. (2010b). Methodological and interpretative issues regarding the phenomenology of consciousness inventory-hypnotic assessment procedure: A comment on Pekala et al., (20l0a, 20l0b). American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 53, 105–113. doi:10.1080/00029157.2010.10404333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagstaff, G. (1981). Hypnosis, compliance, and belief. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webster’s Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary. (1970). Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merrian.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1989). The practice of hypnotism: Traditional and semi-traditional techniques and phenomenology (Vol. 1). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (2002). Scales, scales, and more scales. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 44, 209–220. doi:10.1080/00029157.2002.10403481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. (1962). Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale: Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wickramasekera, I. E., II. (2015). The elephant, the blind men, and hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57, 452–455. doi:10.1080/00029157.2015.1011501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, L. (1998). SYSTAT 8.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
   Google Scholar
• Woody, E. Z., & McConkey, K. M. (2003). What we don’t know about the brain and hypnosis, but need to: A view from the Buckhorn Inn. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 51, 309–338. doi:10.1076/iceh.51.3.309.15523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelazo, P. D., Moscovitch, M., & Thompson, E. (2007). Consciousness: An introduction. In P. D. Zelano, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 1–3). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar