References

• Barber, J. (1980). Hypnosis and the unhypnotizable. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 23, 4–9. doi:10.1080/00029157.1980.10404012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, T., & Smith, D. (1964). Comparative effects on “hypnotic-like” suggestibility of recorded and spoken suggestions. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28, 384. doi:10.1037/h0045217
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benham, G., Smith, N., & Nash, M. R. (2002). Hypnotic susceptibility scales: Are the mean scores increasing? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 50, 5–16. doi:10.1080/00207140208410087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, K. S. (1981). Do the Stanford Scales tap the “classic suggestion effect”? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29, 42–53. doi:10.1080/00207148108409142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, K. S. (1992). Imagination and dissociation in hypnotic responding. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 40, 253–275. doi:10.1080/00207149208409661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardeña, E. (2014). Hypnos and psyche: How hypnosis has contributed to the study of consciousness. Psychology of Consciousness, 1, 123–138.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, C. (2013). Portuguese norms for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 61, 219–231. doi:10.1080/00207144.2013.753833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, P. F., & Ramos, P. (2012). Involuntary experiencing and the performance of hypnotic test suggestions. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 60, 416–431. doi:10.1080/00207144.2012.701090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z., & Perner, J. (2007). The cold control theory of hypnosis. In G. Jamieson (Ed.), Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 293–314). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egner, T., & Raz, A. (2007). Cognitive control processes and hypnosis. In G. A. Jamieson (Ed.), Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 29–50). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, M. H., Rossi, E. L., & Rossi, S. I. (1976). Hypnotic realities: The induction of clinical hypnosis and forms of indirect suggestion. New York, NY: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgard, E. R. (1977). Divided consciousness: Multiple controls in human thought and action. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyt, C. (1941). Test reliability estimated by analysis of variance. Psychometrika, 6, 153–160.
   Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F. (2006). Measurement of involuntariness in hypnotic response. Retrieved from http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~kihlstrm/hypnosis_involuntariness.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F. (2013). Neuro-hypnotism. Prospects for Hypnosis and Neuroscience, 49, 365–374. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F. (2014). Hypnosis and cognition. Psychology of Consciousness, 1(2), 139–152. [Special Issue on “The Contributions of Hypnosis to Psychology”].
   Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F., & Register, P. A. (1984). Optimal scoring of amnesia on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 32, 51–57. doi:10.1080/00207148408416000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, M., Appourchaux, K., & Raz, A. (2014). Elucidating unconscious processing with instrumental hypnosis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 785: 1–18. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankton, S., & Lankton, C. (1983). The answer within: A clinical framework of Ericksonian hypnotherapy. New York, NY: Brunner Mazel. ISBN: 0-87630-320-3.
   Google Scholar
• Laurence, J.-R., & Perry, C. (1982). Montreal norms for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 30, 167–176. doi:10.1080/00207148208407381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Neufeld, V., & Maré, C. (2008). Direct versus indirect suggestions: A conceptual and methodological review. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 41, 124–152. doi:10.1080/00207149308414543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey, K. M., Barnier, A. J., Maccallum, F. L., & Bishop, K. (1996). A normative and structural analysis of the HGSHS:A with a large Australian sample. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 24, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. W. (2013). Hypnotic suggestion: Opportunities for cognitive neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 565–576. doi:10.1038/nrn3538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Gelfand, R., & Marcovitch, P. (1979). The relevance of hypnotic susceptibility in the clinical context. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 592–603. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.88.5.592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, G. J., Wood, D. P., & Alman, B. M. (1984). A clinical hypnosis primer. La Jolla, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rainville, P., & Price, D. D. (2003). Hypnosis phenomenology and the neurobiology of consciousness. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 51, 105–129. doi:10.1076/iceh.51.2.105.14613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, Form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1980). Hypnotizability revisited. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 22, 130–146. doi:10.1080/00029157.1980.10403217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale, Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yapko, M. D. (1983). A comparative analysis of direct and indirect hypnotic communication styles. American Journal of Psychology, 37, 345–356.
   Google Scholar