References

• Benham, G., Bowers, S., Nash, M., & Muenchen, R. (1998). Self-fulfilling prophecy and hypnotic response are not the same thing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1604–1613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benham, G., Woody, E. Z., Wilson, K. S., & Nash, M. R. (2006). Expect the unexpected: Ability, attitude, and responsiveness to hypnosis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 342–350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics, 29(4), 1165–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H. A., & Krasner, L. (1969). The role of subject expectancies in hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 17(3), 180–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207146908407240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R. J., & Oakley, D. A. (2004). An integrative cognitive theory of hypnosis and high hypnotizability. In G. A. Jamieson (Ed.), Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 152–186). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cardeña, E. (2005). The phenomenology of deep hypnosis: Quiescent and physically active. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53(1), 37–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140490914234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardeña, E., Jönsson, P., Terhune, D. B., & Marcusson-Clavertz, D. (2013). The neurophenomenology of neutral hypnosis. Cortex, 49(2), 375–385. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardeña, E., Kallio, S., Terhune, D., Buratti, S., & Lööf, A. (2007). The effect of translation and sex on hypnotizability testing. Contemporary Hypnosis, 24(4): 154–160. see also erratum: 25, p. 110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.340.
   Google Scholar
• Cardeña, E., Lehmann, D., Faber, P. L., Jönsson, P., Milz, P., Pascual-Marqui, R. D., & Kochi, K. (2012). EEG sLORETA functional imaging during hypnotic arm levitation and voluntary arm lifting. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 60(1), 31–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2011.622184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardeña, E., & Marcusson-Clavertz, D. (2016). The relation of hypnotizability and dissociation to everyday mentation: An experience sampling study. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3(1), 61–79.
   Google Scholar
• Cardeña, E., & Spiegel, D. (1991). Suggestibility, absorption, and dissociation: An integrative model of hypnosis. In J. F. Schumaker (Ed.), Human suggestibility: Advances in theory, research and application (pp. 93–107). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cardeña, E., & Terhune, D. B. (2014). Hypnotizability, personality traits, and the propensity to experience alterations of consciousness. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(3), 292–307.
   Google Scholar
• Council, J. (1999). Measures of hypnotic responding. In I. Kirsch, A. Capafons, E. Cardeña-Buelna, & S. Amigó (Eds.), Clinical hypnosis and self-regulation: Cognitive-behavioral perspectives (pp. 119–140). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Council, J. R., Kirsch, I., & Hafner, I. P. (1986). Expectancy versus absorption in the prediction of hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 182–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derogatis, L. R. (1975). Brief symptom inventory. Baltimore, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research.
   Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z., & Hutton, S. (2013). Understanding hypnosis metacognitively: RTMS applied to left DLPFC increases hypnotic suggestibility. Cortex, 49(2), 386–392. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z., & Perner, J. (2007). Executive control without conscious awareness: The cold control theory of hypnosis. In G. A. Jamieson (Ed.), Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 293–314). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fassler, O., Lynn, S. J., & Knox, J. (2008). Is hypnotic suggestibility a stable trait? Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 240–253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. (1977). An ego-psychological theory of altered consciousness. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 25(4), 372–387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207147708415992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi, B., & Oakley, D. A. (2005). Does “hypnosis” by any other name smell as sweet? the efficacy of “hypnotic” inductions depends on the label “hypnosis.” Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 304–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., & Lynn, S. J. (2010). Hypnotic responsiveness: Expectancy, attitudes, fantasy proneness, absorption, and gender. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 59(1), 103–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2011.522914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, D. (1985). Subjects' expectancies and subjective experience of hypnosis. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, Storrs.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I. (1989). Changing expectations. A key to effective psychoterapy. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I. (Ed.) (1991). The social learning theory of hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Theories of hypnosis: Current models and perspectives (pp. 439–465). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I. (1997). Response expectancy theory and application: A decennial review. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 6(2), 69–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80012-5
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I. (1999). How expectancies shape experience. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., Wickless, C., & Moffitt, K. H. (1999). Expectancy and suggestibility: Are the effects of environmental enhancement due to detection? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47(1), 40–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149908410021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V. K., & Pekala, R. J. (1988). Hypnotizability, absorption, and individual differences in phenomenological experience. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 36(2), 80–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148808409332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V. K., Pekala, R. J., & Cummings, J. (1996). Trait factors, state effects, and hypnotizability. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 44(3), 232–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149608416088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurence, J.-R., Beaulieu-Prévost, D., & Du Chéné, T. (2008). Measuring and understanding individual differences in hypnosis. In M. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 225–253). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Milano, M., & Weekes, J. R. (1991). Hypnosis and pseudomemories: The effects of prehypnotic expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 318–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey, K. M., & Barnier, A. (2004). High hypnotizability: Unity and diversity in behavior and experience. In M. Heap, R. J. Brown, & D. A. Oakley (Eds.), The highly hypnotizable person (pp. 61–84). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, E. C., & Lynn, S. J. (2011). Responding to hypnotic and nonhypnotic suggestions: Performance standards, imaginative suggestibility, and response expectancies. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 59(3), 327–349. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2011.570660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milling, L. S. (2009). Response expectancies: A psychological mechanism of suggested and placebo analgesia. Contemporary Hypnosis, 26(2), 93–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.v26:2
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, G. H., Hallquist, M. N., Schnur, J. B., Jeffrey, D. D., Silverstein, J. H., & Bovbjerg, D. H. (2010). Mediators of a brief hypnosis intervention to control side effects in breast surgery patients: Response expectancies and emotional distress. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(1), 80–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, A. H., & Hilgard, E. R. (1973). Age differences in susceptibility to hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 21(2), 78–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207147308409308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naish, P. L. N. (2007). Time distortions and the nature of hypnosis and consciousness. In G. A. Jamieson (Ed.), Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 271–292). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (1991). Quantifying consciousness: An empirical approach. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Baglio, F., Cabinio, M., Lipari, S., Baglio, G., Mendozzi, L., … Sciaky, R. (2017). Hypnotism as a function of trance state effects, expectancy, and suggestibility: An Italian replication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 65(2), 210–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2017.1276365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (2007). An empirical-phenomenological approach to quantifying consciousness and states of consciousness: With particular reference to understanding the nature of hypnosis. In G. A. Jamieson (Ed.), Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 167–194). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., & Hand, J. (1993). Subjective experience, expectancy and hypnosis: Interacting effects. Contemporary Hypnosis, 10(3), 133–143.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., & Marcano, G. (1995). Anomalous/paranormal experiences, hypnotic susceptibility, and dissociation. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 89(4), 313–332.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., Maurer, R., Elliott-Carter, N., Moon, E., & Mullen, K. (2010a). Suggestibility, expectancy, trance state effects, and hypnotic depth: I. Implications for understanding hypnotism. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 52(4), 271–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., Maurer, R., Elliott-Carter, N., Moon, E., & Mullen, K. (2010b). Suggestibility, expectancy, trance state effects, and hypnotic depth: II. Assessment via the PCI-HAP. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 52(4), 287–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Wenger, C. F., & Levine, R. L. (1985). Individual differences in phenomenological experience: States of consciousness as a function of absorption. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 125–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccione, C., Hilgard, E. R., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1989). On the degree of stability of measured hypnotizability over a 25-year period. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 289–295. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shor, R. E. (1971). Expectancies of being influenced and hypnotic performance. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 19(3), 154–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207147108407165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility: Form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, C. E., & Kirsch, I. (1987). Breaching hypnotic amnesia by manipulating expectancy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96(4), 325–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, M. J., & Salzberg, H. C. (1985). The effect of manipulated expectancies on posthypnotic amnesia. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 33(1), 40–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148508406634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos, N. P., Burnley, M. C., & Cross, P. A. (1993). Response expectancies and interpretations as determinants of hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(6), 1237–1242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terhune, D., & Cardeña, E. (2015). Dissociative subtypes in posttraumatic stress disorders and hypnosis: Neurocognitive parallels and clinical implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 452–457. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415604611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terhune, D. B., & Cardeña, E. (2010a). Differential patterns of spontaneous experiential response to a hypnotic induction: A latent profile analysis. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 1140–1150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terhune, D. B., & Cardeña, E. (2010b). Methodological and interpretative issues regarding the measurement of hypnotic responsivity and its correlates: A comment on Pekala et al. (2010a, b). American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 53(2), 105–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2010.10404333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terhune, D. B., & Hedman, L. R. A. (2017). Metacognition of agency is reduced in high hypnotic suggestibility. Cognition, 168, 176–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomé Pires, C., Ludeña, M. A., & Lopes Pires, C. (2015). Expectancies and hypnotic responsiveness: An experimental-design flaw revealed. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 63(2), 129–143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2014.1002713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagstaff, G. F., Toner, S., & Cole, J. (2002). Is response expectancy sufficient to account for hypnotic negative hallucinations? Contemporary Hypnosis, 19(3), 133–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1557-0711
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1980). Hypnotic susceptibility revisited. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 22(3), 130–146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1980.10403217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale, Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whalley, M. G., & Brooks, G. B. (2009). Enhancement of suggestibility and imaginative ability with nitrous oxide. Psychopharmacology, 203, 745–752. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1424-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R. W. (1941). A preface to a theory of hypnotism. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 36(4), 477–505. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053844
   Google Scholar
• Wickless, C., & Kirsch, I. (1989). Effects of verbal and experiential expectancy manipulations on hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 762–768. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar