References

• Accardi, M., Cleere, C., Lynn, S. J., & Kirsch, I. (2013). Placebo versus “standard” hypnosis rationale: Attitudes, expectancies, hypnotic responses, and experiences. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 56(2), 103–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2013.769087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, K. J., & Bernstein, D. A. (1987). The effect of time of day on hypnotizability: A brief communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 35(3), 141–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148708416049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alladin, A. (2007). Handbook of cognitive hypnotherapy for depression: An evidence-based approach. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Balthazard, C. G., & Woody, E. Z. (1992). The spectral analysis of hypnotic performance with respect to “absorption”. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 40, 21–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149208409644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, T. X. (1985). Hypnosuggestive procedures as catalysts for psychotherapies. In S. J. Lynn & J. P. Garske (Eds.), Contemporary psychotherapies: Models and methods (pp. 333–376). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, T. X. (1999). A comprehensive three-dimensional theory of hypnosis. In I. Kirsch, A. Capafons, E. Carenda-Buena, & S. Amigo (Eds.), Clinical hypnosis and self-regulation: Cognitive-behavioral perspectives (pp. 21–48). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, D., & Lynn, S. J. (1981). Hypnotic susceptibility level and reading invovelment. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29, 366–374. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148108409170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benham, G., Woody, E. Z., Wilson, K. S., & Nash, M. R. (2006). Expect the unexpected: Ability, attitude, and responsiveness to hypnosis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 342–350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, E. M., & Putnam, F. W. (1986). Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174(12), 727–735. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198612000-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnie, K. A., Noel, M., Parker, J. A., Chambers, C. T., Uman, L. S., Kisely, S. R., & McGrath, P. J. (2014). Systematic review and meta-analysis of distraction and hypnosis for needle-related pain and distress in children and adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(8), 783–808. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsu029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braffman, W., & Kirsch, I. (1999). Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability: An empirical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 578–587. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, A. (2007). On the contribution of neurophysiology to hypnosis research: Current state and future directions. In G. A. Jamieson (Ed.), Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 195–219). New York, NY: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Cangas, A. J., & Pérez, M. (1998). The effect of two procedures on hypnotic susceptibility modification. Contemporary Hypnosis, 15(4), 212–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.137
   Google Scholar
• Capafons, A., Alarcón, A., Cabañas, S., & Espejo, B. (2003). Análisis factorial exploratorio y propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Creencias y Actitudes hacia la hipnosis-cliente (Exploratory factor analysis and psychometric properties of the beliefs and attitudes about a hypnosis-client scale). Psicothema, 15(1), 143–147.
   Google Scholar
• Cardeña, E., Jönsson, P., Terhune, D. B., & Marcusson-Clavertz, D. (2013). The neurophenomenology of neutral hypnosis. Cortex, 49(2), 375–385. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P. Y., Liu, Y. M., & Chen, M. L. (2017). The effect of hypnosis on anxiety in patients with cancer: A meta‐analysis. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 14(3), 223–236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cojan, Y., Waber, L., Schwartz, S., Rossier, L., Forster, A., & Vuilleumier, P. (2009). The brain under self-control: Modulation of inhibitory and monitoring cortical networks during hypnotic paralysis. Neuron, 62(6), 862–875. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.05.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comey, G., & Kirsch, I. (1999). Intentional and spontaneous imagery in hypnosis: The phenomenology of hypnotic responding. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47, 65–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149908410023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors, M. H., Barnier, A. J., Coltheart, M., Cox, R. E., & Langdon, R. (2012). Mirrored-self misidentification in the hypnosis laboratory: Recreating the delusion from its component factors. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 17(2), 151–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2011.582287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1989). The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Council, J. R., Kirsch, I., & Grant, D. L. (1996). Imagination, expectancy, and hypnotic responding. In R. G. Kunzendorf, N. P. Spanos, & B. Wallace (Eds.), Hypnosis and imagination (pp. 41–65). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Council, J. R., & Green, J. P. (2004). Examining the absorption-hypnotizability link: The roles of acquiescence and consistency motivation. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 52, 364–377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140490883950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council, J. R., Kirsch, I., & Hafner, L. P. (1986). Expectancy versus absorption in the prediciton of hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 182–189. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council, J. R., Kirsch, I., Vickery, A. R., & Carlson, D. (1983). ‘Trance’ versus ‘skill’ hypnotic inductions: The effects of credibility, expectancy, and experimenter modeling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 432–440. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.51.3.432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covino, N., & Pinnell, C. (2010). Hypnosis and Medicine. In S. J. Lynn, J. W. Rhue, & I. Kirsch (Eds.), Handbook of clinical hypnosis (2nd ed., pp. 551–573). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, H. J., Knebel, T., Kaplan, L., Vendemia, J. M., Xie, M., Jamison, S., & Pribram, K. H. (1998). Hypnotic analgesia: 1. Somatosensory event-related potential changes to noxious stimuli and 2. Transfer learning to reduce chronic low back pain. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 46, 92–132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149808409992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groh, M. (1989). Correlates of hypnotic susceptibility. In N. P. Spanos & J. F. Chaves (Eds.), Psychology series. Hypnosis: The cognitive-behavioral perspective (pp. 32–63). Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z., & Perner, J. (2007). Executive control without conscious awareness: The cold control theory of hypnosis. In G. A. Jamieson (Ed.), Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 293–314). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z., Brown, E., Hutton, S., Kirsch, I., Mazzoni, G., & Wright, D. B. (2009). Hypnotic suggestibility, cognitive inhibition, and dissociation. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(4), 837–847. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, G., Jensen, M. P., & Patterson, D. R. (2007). Hypnotherapy for the management of chronic pain. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 55, 275–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140701338621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, G. R. (2017). Handbook of medical and psychological hypnosis: Foundations, applications, and professional issues. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, G. R., Barabasz, A. F., Council, J. R., & Spiegel, D. (2015). Advancing research and practice: The revised APA division 30 definition of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 63, 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2014.961870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, M. H. (1980). The nature of hypnosis and suggestion (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Halsted Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, M. H., Rossi, E. L., & Rossi, S. I. (1976). Hypnotic realities: The induction of clinical hypnosis and forms of indirect suggestion. Oxford, UK: Irvington Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Faith, M., & Ray, W. J. (1994). Hypnotizability and dissociation in a college age population: Orthogonal individual differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 211–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90027-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassler, O., Lynn, S. J., & Knox, J. (2008). Is hypnotic suggestibility a stable trait? Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 240–253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellows, B. J., & Ragg, L. (1992). The Carleton skills training program: A preliminary British trial. Contemporary Hypnosis, 9(3), 169–174.
   Google Scholar
• Flammer, E., & Alladin, A. (2007). The efficacy of hypnotherapy in the treatment of psychosomatic disorders: Meta-analytical evidence. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 55, 251–274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140701338696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flammer, E., & Bongartz, W. (2003). On the efficacy of hypnosis: A meta‐analytic study. Contemporary Hypnosis, 20(4), 179–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.277
   Google Scholar
• Flory, N., Martinez Salazar, G. M., & Lang, E. V. (2007). Hypnosis for acute distress management during medical procedures. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 55, 303–317. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140701338670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller, J. D., & Gorassini, D. R. (2010). Enhancing hypnotizability and treatment response. In S. J. Lynn, J. W. Rhue, & I. Kirsch (Eds.), Handbook of clinical hypnosis (2nd ed., pp. 339–355). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller, J. D., Lynn, S. J., & Pribble, W. E. (1987). Enhancing hypnotic susceptibility: Interpersonal and rapport factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 586–595. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorassini, D. R., & Spanos, N. P. (1999). The Carleton skill training program for modifying hypnotic suggestibility: Original version and variations. In I. Kirsch, A. Capafons, E. Cardeña-Buelna, & S. Amigó (Eds.), Clinical hypnosis and self-regulation: Cognitive-behavioral perspectives (pp. 141–177). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/10282-006
   Google Scholar
• Gorassini, D. R., & Spanos, N. P. (1986). A social-cognitive skills approach to the successful modification of hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1004–1012. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.1004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. P. (2003). Beliefs about hypnosis: Popular beliefs, misconceptions, and the importance of experience. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 51, 369–381. doi:https://doi.org/10.1076/iceh.51.4.369.16408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. P. (2004). The five factor model of personality and hypnotizability: Little variance in common. Contemporary Hypnosis, 21(4), 161–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.303
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. P. (2012). The Valencia scale of attitudes and beliefs toward hypnosis–Client version and hypnotizability. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 60, 229–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2012.648073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., & Council, J. R. (2004). Does the positive keying of the TAS inflate the absorption-hypnotizability link? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 52, 378–388. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140490884076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., & Green, E. S. (2010). Predicting animal attachment from hypnotizability, absorption, and dissociation scores. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 52, 205–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2010.10401720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., Houts, C. R., & Capafons, A. (2012). Attitudes about hypnosis: Factor analyzing the VSABTH-C with an American sample. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 54, 167–178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2011.616823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., Kvaal, S., Lynn, S. J., Mare, C., & Sandberg, D. A. (1991). Hypnosis, dissociation, fantasy proneness and absorption: The effects of context. Presented at the 99th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., Laurence, J.-R., & Lynn, S. J. (2014). Hypnosis and psychotherapy: From Mesmer to mindfulness. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 199–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000015
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., & Lynn, S. J. (2005). Hypnosis vs. relaxation: Accuracy and confidence in dating international news events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 679–691. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., & Lynn, S. J. (2008). Fantasy-proneness and hypnotizability: Another look. Contemporary Hypnosis, 25(3–4), 156–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.360
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., & Lynn, S. J. (2011). Hypnotic responsiveness: Expectancy, attitudes, fantasy proneness, absorption, and gender. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 59, 103–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2011.522914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., & Lynn, S. J. (2019). Cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness, and hypnosis for smoking cessation: A scientifically informed intervention. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., Lynn, S. J., & Malinoski, P. (1998). Hypnotic pseudomemories, prehypnotic warnings, and the malleability of suggested memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 431–444. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(199810)12:5<431::aid-acp516>3.3.co;2-i
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., Lynn, S. J., & Montgomery, G. (2006). A meta-analysis of gender, smoking cessation, and hypnosis: A brief communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 54, 224–233. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140500528497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., Lynn, S. J., & Montgomery, G. (2008). Gender-related differences in hypnosis-based treatments for smoking: A follow-up meta-analysis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 50, 259–271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2008.10401628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., Lynn, S. J., Weekes, J. R., Carlson, B. W., Brentar, J., Latham, L., & Kurzhals, R. (1990). Literalism as a marker of hypnotic” trance”: Disconfirming evidence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 16–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.99.1.16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., Page, R. A., Handley, G. W., & Rasekhy, R. (2005a). The “hidden observer” and ideomotor responding: A real‐simulator comparison. Contemporary Hypnosis, 22(3), 123–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.8
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., Page, R. A., Handley, G. W., & Rasekhy, R. (2005b). The hidden observer: Final thoughts but not the last word. Contemporary Hypnosis, 22(3), 163–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.3
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., Page, R. A., Rasekhy, R., Johnson, L. K., & Bernhardt, S. E. (2006). Cultural views and attitudes about hypnosis: A survey of college students across four countries. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 54, 263–280. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140600689439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., Smith, R. J., & Kromer, M. (2015). Diurnal variations in hypnotic responsiveness: Is there an optimal time to be hypnotized? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 63, 171–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2015.1002675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häuser, W., Hagl, M., Schmierer, A., & Hansen, E. (2016). The efficacy, safety and applications of medical hypnosis: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 113(17), 289–296. doi:https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2016.0289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgard, E. R. (1973). A neodissociation interpretation of pain reduction in hypnosis. Psychological Review, 80, 396–411. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgard, E. R. (1977). Divided consciousness: Multiple controls in human thought and action. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgard, J. R. (1965). Personality and hypnotizability: Inferences from case studies. In E. R. Hilgard (Ed.), Hypnotic susceptibility (pp. 343–374). Oxford, UK: Harcourt, Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgard, J. R. (1970). Personality and hypnosis: A study of imaginative involvement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. P., & Patterson, D. R. (2014). Hypnotic approaches for chronic pain management: Clinical implications of recent research findings. American Psychologist, 69, 167–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F. (1985). Hypnosis. Annual Review of Psychology, 36(1), 385–418. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.36.1.385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F. (2003). The fox, the hedgehog, and hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 51, 166–189. doi:https://doi.org/10.1076/iceh.51.2.166.14611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F. (2018). Hypnosis as an altered state of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25(11–12), 53–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I. (1990). Changing expectations: A key to effective psychotherapy. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I. (1991). The social learning theory of hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), The Guilford clinical and experimental hypnosis series. Theories of hypnosis: Current models and perspectives (pp. 439–465). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., & Braffman, W. (2001). Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(2), 57–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., & Lynn, S. J. (1995). Altered state of hypnosis: Changes in the theoretical landscape. American Psychologist, 50, 846–858. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.10.846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., & Lynn, S. J. (1997). Hypnotic involuntariness and the automaticity of everyday life. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 40, 329–348. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1997.10403402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., & Lynn, S. J. (1998). Dissociation theories of hypnosis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 100–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.1.100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., & Lynn, S. J. (1999). The automaticity of behavior and clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 54, 504-–515. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., Mazzoni, G., Roberts, K., Dienes, Z., Hallquist, M., Williams, J., & Lynn, S. J. (2008). Slipping into trance. Contemporary Hypnosis, 25(3), 202–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.361
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., Montgomery, G., & Sapirstein, G. (1995). Hypnosis as an adjunct to cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 214–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.63.2.214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., Silva, C. E., Comey, G., & Reed, S. (1995). A spectral analysis of cognitive and personality variables in hypnosis: Empirical disconfirmation of the two-factor model of hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 167–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., Costantini-Ferrando, M. F., Alpert, N. M., & Spiegel, D. (2000). Hypnotic visual illusion alters color processing in the brain. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(8), 1279–1284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.8.1279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, M., Lifshitz, M., & Raz, A. (2017). Brain correlates of hypnosis: A systematic review and meta-analytic exploration. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81(Part A), 75–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurence, J.-R., Beaulieu-Prévost, D., & Du Chéné, T. (2008). Measuring and understanding individual differences in hypnotizability. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 225–253). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lifshitz, M., Cusumano, E. P., & Raz, A. (2013). Hypnosis as neurophenomenology. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 469–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., & Rhue, J. W. (1991). An integrative model of hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), The Guilford clinical and experimental hypnosis series. Theories of hypnosis: Current models and perspectives (pp. 397–438). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., & Sivec, H. (1992). The hypnotizable subject as creative problem-solving agent. In E. Fromm & M. R. Nash (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in hypnosis research (pp. 292–333). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J. (1997). Automaticity and hypnosis: A sociocognitive account. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 45, 239–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149708416126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Kirsch, I., Knox, J., Fassler, O., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2007). Hypnosis and neuroscience: Implications for the altered state debate. In G. A. Jamieson (Ed.), Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 145–165). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Kirsch, I., & Hallquist, M. N. (2008). Social cognitive theories of hypnosis. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 111–139). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Kirsch, I., & Rhue, J. (2010). An introduction to clinical hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn, J. W. Rhue, & I. Kirsch (Eds.), Handbook of clinical hypnosis (2nd ed., pp. 3–18). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Krackow, E., Loftus, E. F., Locke, T. G., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2015). Constructing the past: Problematic memory recovery techniques in psychotherapy. In S. O. Lilienfeld, S. J. Lynn, & J. M. Lohr (Eds.), Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology (2nd ed., pp. 210–244). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Lemons, P., Green, J. P., Mazzoni, G., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Kirsch, I. (2015). Forensic hypnosis. In R. Cautin & S. O. Lilienfeld (Eds.), Encyclopedia of clinical psychology (pp. 1262–1264). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Green, J. P., Elinoff, V., Baltman, J., & Maxwell, R. (2016). When worlds combine: Synthesizing hypnosis, mindfulness, and acceptance-based approaches to psychotherapy and smoking cessation. In A. Raz & M. Lifshitz (Eds.), Hypnosis and meditation: Towards an integrative science of conscious planes (pp. 427–442). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Polizzi, C., Green, J. P., Aksen, D. E., Gautam, A., & Evans, J. (in press). Hypnosis and health psychology. In L. Cohen (Ed.), The Wiley encyclopedia of health psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., & Evans, J. (2017). Hypnosis produces mystical-type experiences in the laboratory: A demonstration proof. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(1), 23–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000105
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., & Green, J. P. (2011). The sociocognitive and dissociation theories of hypnosis: Toward a rapprochement. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 59, 277–293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2011.570652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Green, J. P., Jaquith, L., & Gasior, D. (2003). Hypnosis and performance standards. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 51, 51–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1076/iceh.51.1.51.14062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Green, J. P., Kirsch, I., Capafons, A., Lilienfeld, S. O., Laurence, J.-R., & Montgomery, G. H. (2015). Grounding hypnosis in science: The “new” APA division 30 definition of hypnosis as a step backwards. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57, 390–401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2015.1011472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Green, J. P., Weekes, J. R., Carlson, B. W., Brentar, J., Latham, L., & Kurzhals, R. (1990). Literalism and hypnosis: Hypnotic versus task-motivated subjects. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 33, 113–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1990.10402913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Hallquist, M., Barnes, S., Fassler, O., Matthews, A., Knox, J., & Williams, J. (2007). Determinants of hypnotic and nonhypnotic suggestibility. Annual Meeting of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Lewiston, Maine.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., & Kirsch, I. (2006). Essentials of clinical hypnosis: An evidence-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/11365-000
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Kirsch, I., & Rhue, J. (1996). Casebook of clinical hypnosis. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Lama Surya Das, L., Hallquist, M. N., & Williams, J. C. (2006). Mindfulness, acceptance, and hypnosis: Cognitive and clinical perspectives. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 54, 143–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140500528240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Laurence, J.-R., & Kirsch, I. (2015). Hypnosis, suggestion, and suggestibility: An integrative model. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57, 314–329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2014.976783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Maxwell, R., & Green, J. P. (2017). The hypnotic induction in the broad scheme of hypnosis: A sociocognitive perspective. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 59, 363–384. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2016.1233093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Nash, M. R., Rhue, J. W., Frauman, D. C., & Sweeney, C. A. (1984). Nonvolition, expectancies, and hypnotic rapport. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 295–303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.93.3.295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Neufeld, V., & Matyi, C. L. (1987). Inductions versus suggestions: Effects of direct and indirect wording on hypnotic responding and experience. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, 76–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.96.1.76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., & Rhue, J. W. (1986). The fantasy-prone person: Hypnosis, imagination, and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 404–408. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., & Rhue, J. W. (1987). Imagination, hypnosis, and fantasy. Journal of Mental Imagery, 11(2), 101–111.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., & Rhue, J. W. (1988). Fantasy proneness: Hypnosis, developmental antecedents, and psychopathology. American Psychologist, 43, 35–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.1.35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Rhue, J. W., & Weekes, J. R. (1990). Hypnotic involuntariness: A social cognitive analysis. Psychological Review, 97, 169–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Snodgrass, M., Rhue, J. W., Nash, M. R., & Frauman, D. C. (1987). Attributions, involuntariness, and hypnotic rapport. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 30, 36–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1987.10402720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Vanderhoff, H., Shindler, K., & Stafford, J. (2002). Defining hypnosis as a trance vs. cooperation: Hypnotic inductions, suggestibility, and performance standards. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 44, 231–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2002.10403483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Weekes, J., Brentar, J., Neufeld, V., Zivney, O., & Weiss, F. (1991). Interpersonal climate and hypnotizability level: Effects on hypnotic performance, rapport, and archaic involvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 739–743. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Weekes, J., Snodgrass, M., Abrams, L., Weiss, F., & Rhue, J. W. (1986). Control and countercontrol in hypnosis. Paper presented at the 94th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Weekes, J. R., Matyi, C. L., & Neufeld, V. (1988). Direct versus indirect suggestions, archaic involvement, and hypnotic experience. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 296–301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.97.3.296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Weekes, J. R., & Milano, M. J. (1989). Reality versus suggestion: Pseudomemory in hypnotizable and simulating subjects. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 137–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.98.2.137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinoski, P. T., & Lynn, S. J. (1999). The plasticity of early memory reports: Social pressure, hypnotizability, compliance and interrogative suggestibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47, 320–345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149908410040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, R., Lynn, S. J., & Condon, L. (2015). Hypnosis, hypnotic suggestibility, memory, and involvement in films. Consciousness and Cognition: an International Journal, 33, 170–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey, K. M. (1986). Opinions about hypnosis and self-hypnosis before and after hypnotic testing. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 34, 311–319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148608406996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey, K. M. (1991). The construction and resolution of experience and behavior in hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Theories of hypnosis: Current models and perspectives (pp. 542–563). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• McGeown, W. J., Mazzoni, G., Venneri, A., & Kirsch, I. (2009). Hypnotic induction decreases anterior default mode activity. Consciousness and Cognition: an International Journal, 18(4), 848–855. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, E., & Lynn, S. J. (2011). Responding to hypnotic and nonhypnotic suggestions: Performance standards, imaginative suggestibility, and response expectancies. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 59, 327–349. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2011.570660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milling, L. S., Gover, M. C., & Moriarty, C. L. (2018). The effectiveness of hypnosis as an intervention for obesity: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5(1), 29–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000139.supp
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, G. H., David, D., Winkel, G., Silverstein, J. H., & Bovbjerg, D. H. (2002). The effectiveness of adjunctive hypnosis with surgical patients: A meta-analysis. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 94(6), 1639–1645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, G. H., Duhamel, K. N., & Redd, W. H. (2000). A meta-analysis of hypnotically induced analgesia: How effective is hypnosis? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 48, 138–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140008410045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, G. H., Schnur, J. B., & David, D. (2011). The impact of hypnotic suggestibility in clinical care settings. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 59, 294–309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2011.570656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, G. H., Sucala, M., Dillon, M. J., & Schnur, J. B. (2017). Interest and attitudes about hypnosis in a large community sample. Psychology of Consciousness, Theory, Research, and Practice, 5(2), 212–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000141
   Google Scholar
• Nadon, R., Hoyt, I. P., Register, P. A., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1991). Absorption and hypnotizability: Context effects reexamined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 144–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.1.144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, M. R., & Barnier, A. J. (2012). The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, M. R., Lynn, S. J., & Stanley, S. (1984). The direct suggestion of altered mind/body perception. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 27, 95–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1984.10402863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, M. R., Lynn, S. J., Stanley, S., & Carlson, V. (1987). Subjectively complete hypnotic deafness and auditory priming. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 35, 32–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148708416034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Néron, S., & Stephenson, R. (2007). Effectiveness of hypnotherapy with cancer patients' trajectory: emesis, acute pain, and analgesia and anxiolysis in procedures. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 55(3), 336–354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140701338647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Néron, S., & Stephenson, R. (2007). Effectiveness of hypnotherapy with cancer patients’ trajectory: Emesis, acute pain, and analgesia and anxiolysis in procedures. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 55, 336–354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140701338647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedzwieñska, A. (2000). Goal-directed fantasy does not explain the training effect of the Carleton skills training package. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 48, 404–417. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140008410369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, J., & McConkey, K. M. (1995). Hypnotic sex change: Creating and challenging a delusion in the laboratory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 69–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.104.1.69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakman, J. M., Woody, E. Z., & Bowers, K. S. (1996). Contextual influences on the relationship between absorption and hypnotic ability. Contemporary Hypnosis, 13(1), 19–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.39
   Google Scholar
• Orne, M. T. (1959). The nature of hypnosis: Artifact and essence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 58, 277–299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, D. R., Jensen, M. P., Wiechman, S. A., & Sharar, S. R. (2010). Virtual reality hypnosis for pain associated with recovery from physical truama. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 58, 288–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207141003760595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, E. L. (1982). Hypnosis and ultradian cycles: A new state (s) theory of hypnosis? American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 25, 21–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1982.10404061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarbin, T. R., & Coe, W. C. (1972). Hypnosis: A social psychological analysis of influence communication. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefert, R., Klose, P., Moser, G., & Häuser, W. (2014). Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of hypnosis in adult irritable bowel syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychosomatic Medicine, 76(5), 389–398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan, P. W. (1991). Hypnosis, context, and commitment. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Theories of hypnosis: Current models and perspectives (pp. 520–541). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, P. W., & McConkey, K. M. (1982). Hypnosis and experience: The exploration of penomena and process. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, M., Yang, Y. H., & Koo, M. (2009). A meta-analysis of hypnosis in the treatment of depressive symptoms: A brief communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 57, 431–442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140903099039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, C. E., & Kirsch, I. (1992). Interpretive sets, expectancy, fantasy proneness, and dissociation as predictors of hypnotic response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 847–856. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.5.847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, M., & Lynn, S. J. (1989). Music absorption and hypnotizability. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 37, 41–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148908410532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos, N. P. (1986a). Hypnosis and the modification of hypnotic susceptibility: A social psychological perspective. In P. Naish (Ed.), What is hypnosis (pp. 85–120). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spanos, N. P. (1986b). Hypnotic behavior: A social psychological interpretation of amnesia, analgesia, and ‘trance logic’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9(3), 449–467. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00046537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos, N. P. (1991). A sociocognitive approach to hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Theories of hypnosis: Current models and perspectives (pp. 324–361). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Spanos, N. P., Brett, P. J., Menary, E. P., & Cross, W. P. (1987). A measure of attitudes toward hypnosis: Relationships with absorption and hypnotic susceptibility. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 30, 139–150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1987.10404174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos, N. P., de Groot, H., & Gwynn, M. (1987). Trance logic as incomplete responding. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 53, 911–921. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.5.911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos, N. P., Radtke, H. L., Hodgins, D. C., Bertrand, L. D., & Stam, H. J. (1981). The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale (Unpublished manuscript). Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Spanos, N. P., Radtke, H. L., Hodgins, D. C., Stam, H. J., & Bertrand, L. D. (1983). The Carleton University responsiveness to suggestion scale: Normative data and psychometric properties. Psychological Reports, 53(2), 523–535. doi:https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1983.53.2.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos, N. P., Rivers, S. M., & Ross, S. (1977). Experienced involuntariness and response to hypnotic suggestions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 296(1), 208–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb38173.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spanos, N. P., Robertson, L. A., Menary, E. P., & Brett, P. J. (1986). Component analysis of cognitive skill training for the enhancement of hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 350–357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.95.4.350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, S., Lynn, S. J., & Nash, M. R. (1986). Trance logic, susceptibility screening, and the transparency response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 447–454. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. H. (2005). Hypnosis in contemporary medicine. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 80(4), 511–524. doi:https://doi.org/10.4065/80.4.511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szechtman, H., Woody, E., Bowers, K. S., & Nahmias, C. (1998). Where the imaginal appears real: A positron emission tomography study of auditory hallucinations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(4), 1956–1960. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.4.1956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tefikow, S., Barth, J., Maichrowitz, S., Beelmann, A., Strauss, B., & Rosendahl, J. (2013). Efficacy of hypnosis in adults undergoing surgery or medical procedures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(5), 623–636. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellegen, A. (1981). Practicing the two disciplines for relaxation and enlightenment: Comment on “Role of the feedback signal in electromyograph biofeedback: The relevance of attention” by Qualls and Sheehan. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(2), 217–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.110.2.217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 268–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terhune, D., Cleermans, A., Raz, A., & Lynn, S. J. (2017). Hypnosis and top-down regulation of consciousness. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81(PartA), 59–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terhune, D. B., Cardeña, E., & Lindgren, M. (2011). Dissociated control as a signature of typological variability in high hypnotic suggestibility. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(3), 727–736. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagstaff, G. F., Toner, S., & Cole, J. (2002). Is response expectancy sufficient to account for hypnotic negative hallucinations? Contemporary Hypnosis, 19(3), 133–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.250
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, B. (1993). Day persons, night persons, and variability in hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 827–833. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. C., & Barber, T. X. (1981). Vivid fantasy and hallucinatory abilities in the life histories of excellent hypnotic subjects (‘somnabules’): Preliminary report with female subjects. In E. Klinger (Ed.), Concepts, results, and applications (pp. 133–152). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. C., & Barber, T. X. (1983a). The fantasy-prone personality: Implications for understanding imagery, hypnosis, and parapsychological phenomena. In A. A. Sheikh (Ed.), Imagery: Current theory, research, and application (pp. 340–387). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. C., & Barber, T. X. (1983b). Inventory of childhood memories and imaginings. Framingham, MA: Cushing Hospital.
   Google Scholar
• Woody, E. Z., & Barnier, A. J. (2008). Hypnosis scales for the twenty-first century: What do we need and how should we use them. In A. Barnier & M. R. Nash (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 255–282). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woody, E. Z., Barnier, A. J., & McConkey, K. M. (2005). Multiple hypnotizabilities: Differentiating the building blocks of hypnotic response. Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 200–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.2.200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yapko, M. D. (2018). Trancework: An introduction to the practice of clinical hypnosis (5th ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar