References

• Acunzo, D., & Terhune, D. (2021). A critical review of standardized measures of hypnotic suggestibility. International Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis, 69(1), 50–71. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/m93uy
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anlló, H., & Sackur, J. (2017). French norms for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Brunner/Mazel.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benham, G., Woody, E. Z., Wilson, K. S., & Nash, M. R. (2006). Expect the unexpected: Ability, attitude, and responsiveness to hypnosis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 342–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, K. S. (1993). The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Normative and comparative data. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 41(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149308414536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardeña, E., & Terhune, D. B. (2009). A note of caution on the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: A brief communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 57(2), 222–226. www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00207140802665484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Saldanha da Gama, P. A. M., Davy, T., & Cleeremans, A. (2012). Belgian norms for the Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 60(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2012.675299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2015). cocor : A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLOS ONE, 10(4), e0121945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I. (2001). The response set theory of hypnosis: Expectancy and physiology. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 44(1), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2001.10403458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurence, J.-R., Beaulieu-Prévost, D., & Du Chéné, T. (2008). Measuring and understanding individual differences in hypnotizability. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 255–282). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lush, P., Moga, G., McLatchie, N., & Dienes, Z. (2018). The Sussex-Waterloo Scale of Hypnotizability (SWASH): Measuring capacity for altering conscious experience. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2018(1), niy006. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niy006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Kirsch, I., Terhune, D. B., & Green, J. P. (2020). Myths and misconceptions about hypnosis and suggestion: Separating fact and fiction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(6), 1253–1264. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina-Peral, J. A., Rodríguez, J. S., Capafons, A., & Mendoza, M. E. (2020). Attitudes toward hypnosis based on source of information and experience with hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 62(3), 282–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2019.1584741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, A. H., Johnson, D. L., & Hilgard, E. R. (1974). The stability of hypnotic susceptibility: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 22(3), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207147408413004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. W. (2013). Hypnotic suggestion: Opportunities for cognitive neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(8), 565–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palfi, B., Moga, G., Lush, P., Scott, R. B., & Dienes, Z. (2019). Can hypnotic suggestibility be measured online? Psychological Research, 84(5), 1460–1471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01162-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccione, C., Hilgard, E. R., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1989). On the degree of stability of measured hypnotizability over a 25-year period. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 289. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramondo, N., Gignac, G. E., Pestell, C. F., & Byrne, S. M. (2021). Clinical hypnosis as an adjunct to cognitive behavior therapy: An updated meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 69(2), 169–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2021.1877549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reategui, R. (2020). The relationship between expectation and hypnotic susceptibility: A literature review. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 63(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2020.1742085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheiner, E. O., Lifshitz, M., & Raz, A. (2016). Placebo response correlates with hypnotic suggestibility. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3(2), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000074
   Google Scholar
• Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1963). Norms on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 11(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207146308409226
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terhune, D. B., & Hedman, L. R. A. (2017). Metacognition of agency is reduced in high hypnotic suggestibility. Cognition, 168, 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1959). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scales, Forms A and B. Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wieder, L., & Terhune, D. B. (2019). Trauma and anxious attachment influence the relationship between suggestibility and dissociation: A moderated-moderation analysis. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 24(3), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2019.1606705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar