A maximum discrimination DEA method for ranking association rules in data mining

References

• Agrawal , R. , Imielinski , T. and Swami , A. Mining Association Between Sets of Items in Massive Database . ternational Proceedings of the ACM-SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data , pp. 207 – 216 .
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal , R. and Srikant , R. Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules . Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Databases. , pp. 487 – 499 .
   Google Scholar
• Amin , G. R. 2009 . Optimal solution of technology selection model: A computational efficient form . Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol , 43 ( 9–10 ) : 1046 – 1050 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin , G. R. and Emrouznejad , E. 2010 . Finding relevance search engines results: A minimax linear programming approach . J. Oper. Res. Soc , 61 ( 7 ) : 1144 – 1150 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazaraa , M. S. , Jarvis , J. J. and Sherali , H. D. 2005 . “ Linear Programming and Network Flows ” . Edited by: r , d . NJ : John Wiley & Sons .
   Google Scholar
• Chen , M. C. 2007 . Ranking discovered rules from data mining with multiple criteria by data envelopment analysis . Expert Syst. Appl , 33 : 1110 – 1116 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi , D. H. , Ahn , B. S. and Kim , S. H. 2005 . Prioritization of association rules in data mining: Multiple criteria decision approach . Expert Syst. Appl , 29 : 867 – 878 .
   Google Scholar
• Gattoufi , S. , Oral , M. , Kumar , A. and Reisman , A. 2004 . Content analysis of data envelopment analysis literature and its comparison with that of other OR/MS fields . J. Oper. Res. Soc , 55 : 911 – 935 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng , L. and Hamilton , H. J. 2006 . Interestingness measures for data mining: A survey . ACM Comput. Surv , 38 ( 3 ) : 1 – 32 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsak , E. E. and Ahiska , S. S. 2008 . Improved common weight MCDM model for technology selection . Int. J. Prod. Res , 46 ( 24 ) : 6933 – 6944 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llamazares , B. and Peña , T. 2009 . Preference aggregation and DEA: An analysis of the methods proposed to discriminate efficient candidates . Euro. J. Oper. Res , 197 ( 2 ) : 714 – 721 .
   Google Scholar
• Pendharkar , P. C. 2005 . A data envelopment analysis-based approach for data preprocessing . IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng , 17 ( 10 ) : 1379 – 1388 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petry , F. E. and Zhao , L. 2009 . Data mining by attribute generalization with fuzzy hierarchies in fuzzy databases . Fuzzy Sets Syst , 160 ( 15 ) : 2206 – 2223 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanathan , R. 2006 . Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process . Comput. Oper. Res , 33 : 1289 – 1307 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toloo , M. , Sohrabi , B. and Nalchigar , S. 2009 . A new method for ranking discovered rules from data mining by DEA . Expert Syst. Appl , 36 ( 4 ) : 8503 – 8508 .
   Google Scholar
• Wang , Y. M. and Chin , K. S. 2009 . A new data envelopment analysis method for priority determination and group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process . European J. Oper. Res , 195 : 239 – 250 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang , Y. M. , Liu , J. and Elhag , T. M.S. 2008 . An integrated AHP–DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment . Comput. Ind. Eng , 54 : 513 – 525 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb , G. I. and Zhang , S. 2005 . K-optimal rule discovery . Data Min. Knowl. Discov , 10 ( 1 ) : 39 – 79 .
   Google Scholar
• Zhang , S. , Tjortjis , C. , Zeng , X. , Qiao , H. , Buchan , I. and Keane , J. 2009 . Comparing data mining methods with logistic regression in childhood obesity prediction . Inf. Syst. Front , 11 ( 4 ) : 449 – 460 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar