On the use of thresholds in multi-adjoint concept lattices

References

• R. Bělohlávek, Concept lattices and order in fuzzy logic, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 128 (2004), pp. 277–298. doi: 10.1016/j.apal.2003.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Bělohlávek, A note on variable threshold concept lattices: Threshold-based operators are reducible to classical concept-forming operators, Inform. Sci. 177(15) (2007), pp. 3186–3191. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2007.02.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Bělohlávek and V. Vychodil, Reducing the size of fuzzy concept lattices by hedges, The 2005 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Reno, Nevada, USA, 2005, pp. 663–668.
   Google Scholar
• R. Bělohlávek, J. Outrata, and V. Vychodil, Thresholds and shifted attributes in formal concept analysis of data with fuzzy attributes, in Conceptual Structures: Inspiration and Application, 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2006, Aalborg, Denmark, July 16–21, 2006. Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4068, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006, pp. 117–130.
   Google Scholar
• R. Bělohlávek, B. De Baets, J. Outrata, and V. Vychodil, Computing the lattice of all fixpoints of a fuzzy closure operator, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 18(3) (2010), pp. 546–557. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2010.2041006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Burusco and R. Fuentes-González, Construction of the L-fuzzy concept lattice, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 97(1) (1998), pp. 109–114. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00318-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Cornejo, J. Medina, and E. Ramírez, A comparative study of adjoint triples, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 211 (2013), pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2012.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Cornejo, J. Medina, and E. Ramírez, Multi-adjoint concept lattices reduced by thresholds, International Conference on Computational and Mathematical Methods in Science and Engineering (CMMSE 2013), Volume II, Cabo de Gata, Almería, Spain, 2013, pp. 467–476.
   Google Scholar
• C. Cornelis, J. Medina, and N. Verbiest, Multi-adjoint fuzzy rough sets, Third International Workshop on Rough Set Theory (RST 2011), Milan, Italy, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• C. Cornelis, J. Medina, and N. Verbiest, Multi-adjoint fuzzy rough sets: Definition, properties and attribute selection. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 55(1) (2014), pp. 412–426.
   Google Scholar
• B. Davey and H. Priestley, Introduction to Lattices and Order, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• J.C. Díaz and J. Medina, Multi-adjoint relation equations: Definition, properties and solutions using concept lattices. Inform. Sci. 253 (2013), pp. 100–109.
   Google Scholar
• J. Díaz, J. Medina, and R. Rodríguez, Un algoritmo rápido para obtener retíulos de conceptos utilizando el lenguaje de programación python, XVI Congreso Español sobre Tecnologías y Lógica Fuzzy, ESTYLF 2012, Valladolid, Spain, 2012, pp. 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• S. Elloumi, J. Jaam, A. Hasnah, A. Jaoua, and I. Nafkha, A multi-level conceptual data reduction approach based on the lukasiewicz implication, Inform. Sci. 163(4) (2004), pp. 253–262. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2003.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Formica, Concept similarity in fuzzy formal concept analysis for semantic web, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Syst. 18(2) (2010), pp. 153–167. doi: 10.1142/S0218488510006465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Galitsky and J.D.L. Rosa, Concept-based learning of human behavior for customer relationship management, Inform. Sci. 181(10) (2011), pp. 2016–2035. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2010.08.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Georgescu and A. Popescu, Non-commutative fuzzy Galois connections, Soft Comput. 7(7) (2003), pp. 458–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Hájek, Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic, Trends in Logic, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• P. Julian, G. Moreno, and J. Penabad, On fuzzy unfolding: A multi-adjoint approach, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 154(1) (2005), pp. 16–33. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2005.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Kang, D. Li, S. Wang, and K. Qu, Formal concept analysis based on fuzzy granularity base for different granulations, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 203 (2012), pp. 33–48. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2012.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Konecny, J. Medina, and M. Ojeda-Aciego, Intensifying hedges and the size of multi-adjoint concept lattices with heterogeneous conjunctors, The 9th International Conference on Concept Lattices and Their Applications, Fuengirola, Málaga, Spain, 2012, pp. 245–256.
   Google Scholar
• S. Krajči, A generalized concept lattice, Logic J. IGPL 13(5) (2005), pp. 543–550. doi: 10.1093/jigpal/jzi045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Kumar and S. Srinivas, Mining associations in health care data using formal concept analysis and singular value decomposition, J. Biol. Syst. 18(4) (2010), pp. 787–807. doi: 10.1142/S0218339010003512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.A. Kumar and S. Srinivas, Concept lattice reduction using fuzzy k-means clustering, Expert Syst. Appl. 37(3) (2010), pp. 2696–2704. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Li and J. Zhang, Attribute reduction in fuzzy concept lattices based on the t-implication, Knowledge-Based Syst. 23(6) (2010), pp. 497–503. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2010.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Li, X. Sun, and H. Leung, Combining concept lattice with call graph for impact analysis, Adv. Eng. Softw. 53 (2012), pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2012.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Medina, Multi-adjoint property-oriented and object-oriented concept lattices, Inform. Sci. 190 (2012), pp. 95–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2011.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Medina, Relating attribute reduction in formal, object-oriented and property-oriented concept lattices, Comput. Math. Appl. 64(6) (2012), pp. 1992–2002. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.03.087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Medina and M. Ojeda-Aciego, Multi-adjoint t-concept lattices, Inform. Sci. 180(5) (2010), pp. 712–725. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2009.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Medina, M. Ojeda-Aciego, A. Valverde, and P. Vojtáš, Towards biresiduated multi-adjoint logic programming, Lecture Notes Artif. Intell. 3040 (2004), pp. 608–617.
   Google Scholar
• J. Medina, M. Ojeda-Aciego, and P. Vojtáš, Similarity-based unification: A multi-adjoint approach, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 146 (2004), pp. 43–62. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2003.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Medina, M. Ojeda-Aciego, and J. Ruiz-Calviño, Formal concept analysis via multi-adjoint concept lattices, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160(2) (2009), pp. 130–144. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2008.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.-S. Qu and Y.-H. Zhai, Generating complete set of implications for formal contexts, Knowledge-Based Syst. 21 (2008), pp. 429–433. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2008.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Wei and J.-J. Qi, Relation between concept lattice reduction and rough set reduction, Knowledge-Based Syst. 23(8) (2010), pp. 934–938. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Wille, Restructuring lattice theory: An approach based on hierarchies of concepts, in Ordered Sets, I. Rival, ed., Reidel, Springer, Dordrecht, 1982, pp. 445–470.
   Google Scholar
• W. Zhang, L. Wei, and J. Qi, Attribute reduction in concept lattice based on discernibility matrix, Lecture Notes Comput. Sci. 3642 (2005), pp. 157–165.
   Google Scholar
• W.-X. Zhang, J.-M. Ma, and S.-Q. Fan, Variable threshold concept lattices, Inform. Sci. 177(22) (2007), pp. 4883–4892. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2007.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar