Stochastic dynamics simulation with generalized interval probability

References

• R. Barton and L. Schruben, Resampling Methods for Input Modeling, Proceedings of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference, Vol. 1, Arlington, VA, 2001, pp. 372–378.
   Google Scholar
• D.G. Cacuci, Sensitivity theory for nonlinear systems. i. Nonlinear functional analysis approach, J. Math. Phys. 22 (1981), pp. 2794–2802. doi: 10.1063/1.525186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Cheng and W. Holloand, Sensitivity of computer simulation experiments to errors in input data, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 57 (1997), pp. 219–241. doi: 10.1080/00949659708811809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Chick, Steps to Implement Bayesian Input Distribution Selection, Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Winter Simulation: Simulation–A Bridge to the Future-Volume 1, Phoenix, AZ, 1999, pp. 317–324.
   Google Scholar
• G. de Cooman, F. Hermans, and E. Quaeghebeur, Imprecise Markov chains and their limit behavior, Probab. Engrg. Inform. Sci. 23 (2009), pp. 597–635. doi: 10.1017/S0269964809990039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.P. Dempster, Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping, Ann. Math. Stat. 38 (1967), pp. 325–339. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177698950
   Google Scholar
• M. Di Paola and R. Santoro, Path integral solution for non-linear system enforced by poisson white noise, Probab. Eng. Mech. 23 (2008), pp. 164–169. doi: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2007.12.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.S. Dimitrova, S.M. Markov, and E.D. Popova, Extended interval arithmetics: New results and applications, in Computer Arithmetic and Enclosure Methods, L. Atanassova and J. Herzberger, eds., Elsevier, New York, NY, 1992, pp. 225–232.
   Google Scholar
• D. Dubois and H. Prade, Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty, Plenum, New York, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• S. Ferson, V. Kreinovich, L. Ginzburg, D.S. Myers, and K. Sentz, Constructing probability boxes and Dempster-Shafer structures, Tech. Rep. SAND2002-4015, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• E. Gardeñes and A. Trepat, Fundamentals of sigla, an interval computing system over the completed set of intervals, Computing 24 (1980), pp. 161–179. doi: 10.1007/BF02281722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Gardeñes, M.A. Sainz, L. Jorba, R. Calm, R. Estela, H. Mielgo, and A. Trepat, Modal intervals, Reliab. Comput. 7 (2001), pp. 77–111. doi: 10.1023/A:1011465930178
   Google Scholar
• M.B. Giles and E. Süli, Adjoint methods for PDES: A posteriori error analysis and postprocessing by duality, Acta Numer. 11 (2002), pp. 145–236. doi: 10.1017/S096249290200003X
   Google Scholar
• P. Glasserman, Gradient Estimation via Perturbation Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• P. Glynn, Likelihood ratio gradient estimation for stochastic systems, Commun. ACM 33 (1990), pp. 75–84. doi: 10.1145/84537.84552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Goldsztejn, On the exponentiation of interval matrices, preprint (2009). Available at arXiv:0908.3954.
   Google Scholar
• J. Goutsias, Quasiequilibrium approximation of fast reaction kinetics in stochastic biochemical systems, J. Chem. Phys. 122 (2005), p. 184102. doi: 10.1063/1.1889434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Hartfiel, Markov Set-Chains, Springer, Berlin, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• J. Helton, Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in the presence of stochastic and subjective uncertainty, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 57 (1997), pp. 3–76. doi: 10.1080/00949659708811803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Ho and X. Cao, Perturbation analysis and optimization of queueing networks, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 40 (1983), pp. 559–582. doi: 10.1007/BF00933971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Kaucher, Interval analysis in the extended interval space IR, in Fundamentals of Numerical Computation (Computer-Oriented Numerical Analysis), Computing Supplementum, Vol. 2, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1980, pp. 33–49.
   Google Scholar
• J. Kleijnen, Experimental design for sensitivity analysis, optimization, and validation of simulation models, in Handbook of Simulation: Principles, Methodology, Advances, Applications, and Practice, J. Banks, ed., John Wiley & Sons, Danvers, MA, 1998, pp. 173–223.
   Google Scholar
• I. Kougioumtzoglou and P. Spanos, An analytical wiener path integral technique for non-stationary response determination of nonlinear oscillators, Probab. Eng. Mech. 28 (2012), pp. 125–131. doi: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2011.08.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Kozine and L. Utkin, Interval-valued finite Markov chains, Reliab. Comput. 8 (2002), pp. 97–113. doi: 10.1023/A:1014745904458
   Google Scholar
• V. Kuznetsov, Interval Methods for Processing Statistical Characteristics, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Applications of Interval Computations APIC’95, El Paso, TX, 1995, pp. 23–25.
   Google Scholar
• A. Law and W. Kelton, Simulation Modeling and Analysis, Vol. 2, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• S. Markov, Calculus for Interval Functions of a Real Variable, Computing 22 (1979), pp. 325–337. doi: 10.1007/BF02265313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Markov, On directed interval arithmetic and its applications, J. UCS 1 (1995), pp. 514–526.
   Google Scholar
• I. Molchanov, Theory of Random Sets, Springer, London, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• B. Möller and M. Beer, Fuzzy Randomness: Uncertainty in Civil Engineering and Computational Mechanics, Springer, Berlin, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• R.E. Moore, Interval Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• A. Naess and J. Johnsen, Response statistics of nonlinear, compliant offshore structures by the path integral solution method, Probab. Eng. Mech. 8 (1993), pp. 91–106. doi: 10.1016/0266-8920(93)90003-E
   Google Scholar
• A. Neumaier, Clouds, fuzzy sets, and probability intervals, Reliab. Comput. 10 (2000), pp. 249–272. doi: 10.1023/B:REOM.0000032114.08705.cd
   Google Scholar
• E. Oppenheimer and A. Michel, Application of interval analysis techniques to linear systems. II. The interval matrix exponential function, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 35 (1988), pp. 1230–1242. doi: 10.1109/31.7598
   Google Scholar
• L. Petzold, S. Li, Y. Cao, and R. Serban, Sensitivity analysis of differential-algebraic equations and partial differential equations, Comput. Chem. Eng. 30 (2006), pp. 1553–1559. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2006.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Popova, Multiplication distributivity of proper and improper intervals, Reliab. Comput. 7 (2001), pp. 129–140. doi: 10.1023/A:1011470131086
   Google Scholar
• M. Reiman and A. Weiss, Sensitivity analysis for simulations via likelihood ratios, Oper. Res. 37 (1989), pp. 830–844. doi: 10.1287/opre.37.5.830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Risken, The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• R. Rubinstein and A. Shapiro, Optimization of static simulation models by the score function method, Math. Comp. Simul. 32 (1990), pp. 373–392. doi: 10.1016/0378-4754(90)90142-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Sandu, D.N. Daescu, and G.R. Carmichael, Direct and adjoint sensitivity analysis of chemical kinetic systems with kpp: Part I – theory and software tools, Atmos. Environ. 37 (2003), pp. 5083–5096. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Satia and R. Lave, Markovian decision processes with uncertain transition probabilities, Oper. Res. 21 (1973), pp. 728–740. doi: 10.1287/opre.21.3.728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Serban and L.R. Petzold, Efficient computation of sensitivities for ordinary differential equation boundary value problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 40 (2002), pp. 220–232. doi: 10.1137/S0036142900376870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Shafer, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• R. Sidje, Expokit: A software package for computing matrix exponentials, ACM Trans. Math. Software 24 (1998), pp. 130–156. doi: 10.1145/285861.285868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Škulj, Finite discrete time Markov chains with interval probabilities, in Soft Methods for Integrated Uncertainty Modelling, J. Lawry, E. Miranda, A. Bugarin, S. Li, M. Angeles Gil, P. Brzegorzewski, and O. Hryniewicz, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006, pp. 299–306.
   Google Scholar
• D. Škulj, Discrete time Markov chains with interval probabilities, Internat. J. Approx. Reason. 50 (2009), pp. 1314–1329. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2009.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Škulj, Interval matrix differential equations, preprint (2012). Available at arXiv:1204.0467.
   Google Scholar
• R. Suri and M. Zazanis, Perturbation analysis gives strongly consistent sensitivity estimates for the m/g/1 queue, Management Sci. 34 (1988), pp. 39–64. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.34.1.39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Swiler, T. Paez, R. Mayes, and M. Eldred, Epistemic Uncertainty in the Calculation of Margins, AIAA Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Palm Springs, CA, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• B. Van Fraassen, Laws and Symmetry, Oxford University Press, New York, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• P. Walley, Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities, Chapman & Hall, London, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Wang, Imprecise probabilities based on generalised intervals for system reliability assessment, Int. J. Reliab. Safety 4 (2010), pp. 319–342. doi: 10.1504/IJRS.2010.035572
   Google Scholar
• Y. Wang, Independence in Generalized Interval Probability, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Vulnerability and Risk Analysis and Management (ICVRAM 2011) and 5th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis (ISUMA 2011), Hyattsville, MD, 2011, pp. 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Wang, Generalized Fokker-Planck equation with generalized interval probability, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 37 (2013), pp. 92–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Wehner and W. Wolfer, Numerical evaluation of path-integral solutions to Fokker-Planck equations, Phys. Rev. A 27 (1983), pp. 2663–2670. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.27.2663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Weichselberger, The theory of interval-probability as a unifying concept for uncertainty, Internat. J. Approx. Reason. 24 (2000), pp. 149–170. doi: 10.1016/S0888-613X(00)00032-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. White and H. Eldeib, Markov decision processes with imprecise transition probabilities, Oper. Res. 42 (1994), pp. 739–749. doi: 10.1287/opre.42.4.739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.Z. Yang and N. Zabaras, An adjoint method for the inverse design of solidification processes with natural convection, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 42 (1998), pp. 1121–1144. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980730)42:6<1121::AID-NME403>3.0.CO;2-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Zouaoui and J. Wilson, Accounting for parameter uncertainty in simulation input modeling, IEEE Trans. 35 (2003), pp. 781–792. doi: 10.1080/07408170304413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar