Adaptive finite differences and IMEX time-stepping to price options under Bates model

References

• Y. Achdou and O. Pironneau, Computational Methods for Option Pricing, Frontiers in Applied Mathematics, vol. 30, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• A. Almendral and C.W. Oosterlee, Numerical valuation of options with jumps in the underlying, Appl. Numer. Math. 53 (2005), pp. 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Andersen and J. Andreasen, Jump-diffusion processes: Volatility smile fitting and numerical methods for option pricing, Rev. Deriv. Res. 4 (2000), pp. 231–262.
   Google Scholar
• D.S. Bates, Jumps and stochastic volatility: Exchange rate processes implicit Deutsche mark options, Review Financial Stud. 9 (1996), pp. 69–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Black and M. Scholes, The pricing of options and corporate liabilities, J. Polit. Econ. 81 (1973), pp. 637–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Chiarella, B. Kang, G.H. Meyer, and A. Ziogas, The evaluation of American option prices under stochastic volatility and jump-diffusion dynamics using the method of lines, Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 12 (2009), pp. 393–425.
   Google Scholar
• N. Clarke and K. Parrott, Multigrid for American option pricing with stochastic volatility, Appl. Math. Finance 6 (1999), pp. 177–195.
   Google Scholar
• R. Cont and E. Voltchkova, A finite difference scheme for option pricing in jump diffusion and exponential Lévy models, SIAM Numer. Anal. 43 (2005), pp. 1596–1626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. d'Halluin, P.A. Forsyth, and G. Labahn, A penalty method for American options with jump diffusion processes, Numer. Math. 97 (2004), pp. 321–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. d'Halluin, P.A. Forsyth, and K.R. Vetzal, Robust numerical methods for contingent claims under jump diffusion processes, IMA J. Numer. Anal. 25 (2005), pp. 87–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.L. Heston, A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options, Rev. Financial Stud. 6 (1993), pp. 327–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ikonen and J. Toivanen, Operator splitting methods for American option pricing, Appl. Math. Lett. 17 (2004), pp. 809–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ikonen and J. Toivanen, Componentwise splitting methods for pricing American options under stochastic volatility, Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 10 (2007), pp. 331–361.
   Google Scholar
• S. Ikonen and J. Toivanen, Efficient numerical methods for pricing American options under stochastic volatility, Numer. Meth. Part. Diff. Eq. 24 (2008), pp. 104–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ikonen and J. Toivanen, Operator splitting methods for pricing American options under stochastic volatility, Numer. Math. 113 (2009), pp. 299–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.J. In 't Hout and S. Foulon, ADI finite difference schemes for option pricing in the Heston model with correlation, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model. 7 (2010), pp. 303–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Kwon and Y. Lee, A second-order finite difference method for option pricing under jump-diffusion models, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 49 (2011), pp. 2598–2617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Kwon and Y. Lee, A second-order tridiagonal method for American options under jump-diffusion models, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 33 (2011), pp. 1860–1872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Lötstedt, J. Persson, L. von Sydow, and J. Tysk, Space-time adaptive finite difference method for European multi-asset options, Comput. Math. Appl. 53 (2007), pp. 1159–1180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.C. Merton, Theory of rational option pricing, Bell J. Econom. Man. Sci. 4 (1973), pp. 141–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Miglio and C. Sgarra, A finite element discretization method for option pricing with the Bates model, S$\overrightarrow{\mathrm{e}}$MA J. (2011), pp. 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• C.W. Oosterlee, On multigrid for linear complementarity problems with application to American-style options, Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal. 15 (2003), pp. 165–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Persson and L. von Sydow, Pricing European multi-asset options using a space-time adaptive FD-method, Comput. Vis. Sci. 10 (2007), pp. 173–183.
   Google Scholar
• J. Persson and L. von Sydow, Pricing American options using a space-time adaptive finite difference method, Math. Comput. Simul. 80 (2010), pp. 1922–1935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ramage and L. von Sydow, A multigrid preconditioner for an adaptive Black-Scholes solver, BIT 51 (2011), pp. 217–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Reisinger and G. Wittum, On multigrid for anisotropic equations and variational inequalities: Pricing multi-dimensional European and American options, Comput. Vis. Sci. 7 (2004), pp. 189–197.
   Google Scholar
• S. Salmi and J. Toivanen, An iterative method for pricing American options under jump-diffusion models, Appl. Numer. Math. 61 (2011), pp. 821–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Salmi and J. Toivanen, IMEX schemes for pricing options under jump-diffusion models, Appl. Numer. Math. 84 (2014), pp. 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Salmi, J. Toivanen, and L. von Sydow, Iterative methods for pricing American options under the Bates model, in Proceedings of 2013 International Conference on Computational Science, Procedia Computer Science Series, vol. 18, Elsevier, 2013, pp. 1136–1144.
   Google Scholar
• S. Salmi, J. Toivanen, and L. von Sydow, An IMEX-scheme for pricing options under stochastic volatility models with jumps, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 36 (2014), pp. B817–B834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Sjöberg, Adaptive finite differences to price European options under the Bates model, Master's thesis, Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University (2013), IT Report 13 063.
   Google Scholar
• R. Skogberg and J. Markhed, Pricing European options using stochastic volatility and integral jump term, Tech. Rep., Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• D. Tavella and C. Randall, Pricing Financial Instruments: The Finite Difference Method, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• J. Toivanen, A componentwise splitting method for pricing American options under the Bates model, in Applied and numerical partial differential equations, Comput. Methods Appl. Sci., vol. 15, Springer, New York, 2010, pp. 213–227.
   Google Scholar
• J. Toivanen and C.W. Oosterlee, A projected algebraic multigrid method for linear complementarity problems, Numer. Math. Theory Meth. Appl. 5 (2012), pp. 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. von Sydow, L.J. Höök, E. Larsson, E. Lindström, S. Milovanović, J. Persson, V. Shcherbakov, Y. Shpolyanskiy, S. Sirén, J. Toivanen, J. Waldén, M. Wiktorsson, J. Levesley, J. Li, C.W. Oosterlee, M.J. Ruijter, A. Toropov, Y. Zhao, BENCHOP–the BENCH marking project in Option Pricing, Int J Comput Math., doi:10.1080/00207160.2015.1072172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Westlund, An IMEX-Method for Pricing Options Under Bates Model Using Adaptive Finite Differences, Tech. Rep., Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• C. Zhang, Fast Fourier transforms in IMEX-schemes to price options under Bates model, Master's thesis, Uppsala University, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• R. Zvan, P.A. Forsyth, and K.R. Vetzal, Penalty methods for American options with stochastic volatility, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 91 (1998), pp. 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Zvan, P.A. Forsyth, and K.R. Vetzal, Robust numerical methods for PDE models of Asian options, J. Comput. Finance 1 (1998), pp. 39–78.
   Google Scholar