Locally adaptive total variation for removing mixed Gaussian–impulse noise

References

• M. Alkämper and A. Langer, Using DUNE-ACFem for non-smooth minimization of bounded variation functions, Arch. Numer. Softw. 5 (2017), pp. 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• A. Almansa, C. Ballester, V. Caselles, and G. Haro, A TV based restoration model with local constraints, J. Sci. Comput. 34 (2008), pp. 209–236. DOI:10.1007/s10915-007-9160-x. MR 2377617 (2009d:94009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Ambrosio, N. Fusco, and D. Pallara, Functions of Bounded Variation and Free Discontinuity Problems, Oxford Mathematical Monographs, The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 2000, MR 1857292 (2003a:49002).
   Google Scholar
• M. Bertalmío, V. Caselles, B. Rougé, and A. Solé, TV based image restoration with local constraints, J. Sci. Comput. 19 (2003), pp. 95–122. doi: 10.1023/A:1025391506181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.C. Bovik, Handbook of Image and Video Processing, Academic Press, New York, NY, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• K. Bredies, K. Kunisch, and T. Pock, Total generalized variation, SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 3 (2010), pp. 492–526. DOI:10.1137/090769521. MR 2736018 (2011k:49029).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.F. Cai, R.H. Chan, and M. Nikolova, Two-phase approach for deblurring images corrupted by impulse plus Gaussian noise, Inverse Probl. Imag. 2 (2008), pp. 187–204. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2008.2.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Calatroni, J.C.D.L Reyes, and C.B. Schönlieb, Infimal convolution of data discrepancies for mixed noise removal, SIAM. J. Imag. Sci. 10 (2017), pp. 1196–1233. doi: 10.1137/16M1101684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.C. Cao, J.C.D.L Reyes, and C.B. Schönlieb, Learning optimal spatially-dependent regularization parameters in total variation image restoration, Inverse Problems 33 (2017), p. 074005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Chambolle and T. Pock, A first-order primal–dual algorithm for convex problems with applications to imaging, J. Math. Imag. Vis. 40 (2011), pp. 120–145. doi: 10.1007/s10851-010-0251-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.Q. Chen and L.Z. Cheng, Spatially adapted regularization parameter selection based on the local discrepancy function for Poissonian image deblurring, Inverse Problems 28 (2011), pp. 015004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Delon and A. Desolneux, A patch-based approach for removing impulse or mixed Gaussian-impulse noise, SIAM J. Imag. Sci. 6 (2013), pp. 1140–1174. DOI:10.1137/120885000. MR 3071403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Dong, H. Ji, J. Li, Z. Shen, and Y. Xu, Wavelet frame based blind image inpainting, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 32 (2012), pp. 268–279. doi: 10.1016/j.acha.2011.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Dong, M. Hintermüller, and M.M. Rincon-Camacho, Automated regularization parameter selection in multi-scale total variation models for image restoration, J. Math. Imaging Vision 40 (2011), pp. 82–104. DOI:10.1007/s10851-010-0248-9. MR 2782120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Garnett, T. Huegerich, C. Chui, and W. He, A universal noise removal algorithm with an impulse detector, IEEE. Trans. Image Process. 14 (2005), pp. 1747–1754. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2005.857261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Ghita and P.F. Whelan, A new GVF-based image enhancement formulation for use in the presence of mixed noise, Pattern Recognit. 43 (2010), pp. 2646–2658. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2010.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Gilboa, N. Sochen, and Y.Y. Zeevi, Texture preserving variational denoising using an adaptive fidelity term, Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Variational, Geometric and Level Set Methods in Computer Vision (VLsM '03), Nice, France, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• E. Giusti, Minimal Surfaces and Functions of Bounded Variation, Monographs in Mathematics, Vol. 80, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1984. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4684-9486-0. MR 775682 (87a:58041).
   Google Scholar
• Z. Gong, Z. Shen, and K.C. Toh, Image restoration with mixed or unknown noises, Multiscale Model. Simul. 12 (2014), pp. 458–487. doi: 10.1137/130904533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Hintermüller and A. Langer, Subspace correction methods for a class of nonsmooth and nonadditive convex variational problems with mixed L1/L2 data-fidelity in image processing, SIAM J. Imag. Sci. 6 (2013), pp. 2134–2173. DOI:10.1137/120894130. MR 3121758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Hintermüller and A. Langer, Adaptive regularization for Parseval frames in image processing, SFB-Report No. 2014-014, p. 12, 2014
   Google Scholar
• M. Hintermüller and A. Langer, Non-overlapping domain decomposition methods for dual total variation based image denoising, J. Sci. Comput. 62 (2015), pp. 456–481. doi: 10.1007/s10915-014-9863-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Hintermüller and C.N. Rautenberg, Optimal selection of the regularization function in a weighted total variation model. Part I: Modelling and theory, J. Math. Imag. Vis. 59 (2017), pp. 498–514. doi: 10.1007/s10851-017-0744-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Hintermüller, C.N. Rautenberg, T. Wu, and A. Langer, Optimal selection of the regularization function in a weighted total variation model. Part II: Algorithm, its analysis and numerical tests, J. Math. Imag. Vis. 59 (2017), pp. 515–533. doi: 10.1007/s10851-017-0736-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Hintermüller and M.M. Rincon-Camacho, Expected absolute value estimators for a spatially adapted regularization parameter choice rule in L1-TV-based image restoration, Inverse Problems 26 (2010), pp. 085005–085030. DOI:10.1088/0266-5611/26/8/085005. MR 2658822 (2011d:65052).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.M. Huang, M.K. Ng, and Y.W. Wen, Fast image restoration methods for impulse and Gaussian noises removal, IEEE. Signal Process. Lett. 16 (2009), pp. 457–460. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2009.2016835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Langer, Automated parameter selection for total variation minimization in image restoration, J. Math. Imag. Vis. 57 (2017), pp. 239–268. DOI: 10.1007/s10851-016-0676-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Langer, Automated parameter selection in the L1-L2-TV model for removing Gaussian plus impulse noise, Inverse Problems 33 (2017), p. 074002. doi: 10.1088/1361-6420/33/7/074002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Li, Q. Liu, J. Xu, and X. Luo, A new method for removing mixed noises, Sci. China Inform. Sci. 54 (2011), pp. 51–59. doi: 10.1007/s11432-010-4128-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Li, M.K. Ng, and C. Shen, Multiplicative noise removal with spatially varying regularization parameters, SIAM J. Imag. Sci. 3 (2010), pp. 1–20. DOI:10.1137/090748421. MR 2609456 (2011g:65066).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Li and T. Zeng, Image restoration via tight frame regularization and local constraints, J. Sci. Comput. 57 (2013), pp. 349–371. doi: 10.1007/s10915-013-9709-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.R. Li, L. Shen, D.Q. Dai, and B.W. Suter, Framelet algorithms for de-blurring images corrupted by impulse plus Gaussian noise, IEEE. Trans. Image Process. 20 (2011), pp. 1822–1837. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2010.2103950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Liu, X.C. Tai, H. Huang, and Z. Huan, A weighted dictionary learning model for denoising images corrupted by mixed noise, IEEE. Trans. Image Process. 22 (2013), pp. 1108–1120. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2012.2227766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.W. Liu, L. Shi, S.C.H. Yu, and D. Wang, Box-constrained second-order total generalized variation minimization with a combined L1,2 data-fidelity term for image reconstruction, J. Electron. Imag. 24 (2015), pp. 033026–033026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. López-Rubio, Restoration of images corrupted by Gaussian and uniform impulsive noise, Pattern Recognit. 43 (2010), pp. 1835–1846. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2009.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Peng and L. Lucke, Fuzzy filtering for mixed noise removal during image processing, Proceedings of the Third IEEE Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 1994. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence. IEEE, New York, 1994, pp. 89–93.
   Google Scholar
• P. Rodríguez, R. Rojas, and B. Wohlberg, Mixed Gaussian-impulse noise image restoration via total variation, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE, New York, 2012, pp. 1077–1080.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Shen, B. Han, and E. Braverman, Removal of mixed Gaussian and impulse noise using directional tensor product complex tight framelets, J. Math. Imag. Vis. 54 (2016), pp. 64–77. doi: 10.1007/s10851-015-0589-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.M. Strong, P. Blomgren, and T.F. Chan, Spatially adaptive local-feature-driven total variation minimizing image restoration, Optical Science, Engineering and Instrumentation '97, Statistical and Stochastic Methods in Image Processing II. Vol. 3167, International Society for Optics and Photonics, San Diego, CA, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Wang, A.C. Bovik, H.R. Sheikh, and E.P. Simoncelli, Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity, IEEE. Trans. Image. Process. 13 (2004), pp. 600–612. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2003.819861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Xiao, T. Zeng, J. Yu, and M.K. Ng, Restoration of images corrupted by mixed Gaussian-impulse noise via l1 - l0 minimization, Pattern Recognit. 44 (2011), pp. 1708–1720. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2011.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Yan, Restoration of images corrupted by impulse noise and mixed Gaussian impulse noise using blind inpainting, SIAM. J. Imag. Sci. 6 (2013), pp. 1227–1245. doi: 10.1137/12087178X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.X. Yang and H.R. Wu, Mixed Gaussian and uniform impulse noise analysis using robust estimation for digital images, 16th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing, 2009. IEEE, New York, 2009, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar