A computationally efficient numerical approach for multi-asset option pricing

References

• L.V. Ballestra and G. Pacelli, Pricing European and American options with two stochastic factors: A highly efficient radial basis function approach, J. Econom. Dynam. Control 37(6) (2013), pp. 1142–1167. MR 3041951. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2013.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Black and M. Scholes, The pricing of options and corporate liabilities, J. Political Econ. 81 (1973), pp. 637–654. MR 3235225. doi: 10.1086/260062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.P. Boyle, J. Evnine, and S. Gibbs, Numerical evaluation of multivariate contingent claims, Rev. Financ. Stud. 2(2) (1989), pp. 241–250. doi: 10.1093/rfs/2.2.241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.J. Bungartz and M. Griebel, Sparse grids, Acta Numer. 13 (2004), pp. 147–269. MR 2249147. doi: 10.1017/S0962492904000182
   Google Scholar
• R. Chen and Z. Wu, Solving partial differential equation by using multiquadric quasi-interpolation, Appl. Math. Comput. 186(2) (2007), pp. 1502–1510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Choi and M.D. Marcozzi, A numerical approach to American currency option valuation, J. Derivatives 9(2) (2001), pp. 19–29. doi: 10.3905/jod.2001.319172
   Google Scholar
• S. Choi and M.D. Marcozzi, The valuation of foreign currency options under stochastic interest rates, Comput. Math. Appl. 46(5) (2003), pp. 741–749. MR 2020434. doi: 10.1016/S0898-1221(03)90138-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Clarke and K. Parrott, The multigrid solution of two-factor, American put options, Tech. Rep., Oxford Computing Laboratory, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• R. Ezzati and K. Shakibi, Using Adomian's decomposition and multiquadric quasi-interpolation methods for solving Newell-Whitehead equation, Procedia Comput. Sci. 3 (2011), pp. 1043–1048. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.171
   Google Scholar
• G.E. Fasshauer, A.Q.M. Khaliq, and D.A. Voss, Using mesh-free approximation for multi-asset American option problems, J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 27 (2004), pp. 563–571. doi: 10.1080/02533839.2004.9670904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Franke, Scattered data interpolation: Tests of some methods, Math. Comput. 38 (1982), pp. 181–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Glasserman, Monte Carlo methods in financial engineering, Vol. 53, Springer, Berlin, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• R.L. Hardy, Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces, J. Geophys. Res. 76 (1971), pp.1905–1915. doi: 10.1029/JB076i008p01905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.C. Hon, A quasi-radial basis functions method for American options pricing, Comput. Math. Appl. 43(3) (2002), pp. 513–524. MR 1883583. doi: 10.1016/S0898-1221(01)00302-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.C. Hon and X.Z. Mao, A radial basis function method for solving options pricing methods, J. Financ. Eng. 8 (1999), pp. 31–49.
   Google Scholar
• Y.C. Hon and R. Schaback, On unsymmetric collocation by radial basis functions, Appl. Math. Comput. 119 (2), pp. 177–186. MR 1823674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.C. Hon and Z. Wu, A quasi-interpolation method for solving stiff ordinary differential equations, Internat. J.Numer. Methods Eng. 48(8) (2000), pp. 1187–1197. MR 1769057. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000720)48:8<1187::AID-NME942>3.0.CO;2-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ibanez and F. Zapatero, Monte carlo valuation of American options through computation of the optimal exercise frontier, J. Finan. Quant. Anal. 39(2) (2004), pp. 253–275. doi: 10.1017/S0022109000003069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.D. Marcozzi, S. Choi, and C.S. Chen, On the use of boundary conditions for variational formulation arising in financial mathematics, Appl. Math. Comput. 124 (2001), pp. 197–214. MR 1857684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Mei and P. Cheng, Multivariate option pricing using quasi-interpolation based on radial basis functions, ICIC, Springer, Berlin, 2008, pp. 620–627.
   Google Scholar
• C.A. Micchelli, Interpolation of scattered data: distance matrices and conditionally positive definite functions, Const. Approx. 2 (1986), pp. 11–22. doi: 10.1007/BF01893414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Pettersson, E. Larsson, G. Marcusson, and J. Persson, Improved radial basis function methods for multi-dimensional option pricing, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 222(1) (2008), pp. 82–93. MR 2462653. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2007.10.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.M. Pooley, K.R. Vetzal, and P.A. Forsyth, Convergence remedies for non-smooth payoffs in option pricing, J.Comput. Finance 6(4) (2003), pp. 25–40. doi: 10.21314/JCF.2003.101
   Google Scholar
• R. Seydel, Tools for Computational Finance, Vol. 69, Springer, Berlin, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• V. Shcherbakov and E. Larsson, Radial basis function partition of unity methods for pricing vanilla basket options, Comput. Math. Appl. 71(1) (2016), pp. 185–200. MR 3441188. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2015.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Shu, H. Ding, and K.S. Yeo, Solution of partial differential equations by a global radial basis function-based differential quadrature method, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 28(10) (2004), pp. 1217–1226. doi: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2003.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Stulz, Options on the minimum or the maximum of two risky assets: Analysis and applications, J. Financ. Econ. 10(2) (1982), pp. 161–185. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(82)90011-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Wu and Y.C. Hon, Convergence error estimate in solving free boundary diffusion problem by radial basis functions method, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 27 (2003), pp. 73–79. doi: 10.1016/S0955-7997(02)00083-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Zvan, P.A. Forsyth, and K. Vetzal, A finite volume approach for contingent claims valuation, IMA J. Numer. Anal. 21(3) (2001), pp. 703–731. MR 1844364. doi: 10.1093/imanum/21.3.703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar