A new hybrid GA−ACO−PSO algorithm for solving various engineering design problems

References

• B. Akay and D. Karaboga, Artificial bee colony algorithm for large-scale problems and engineering design optimization, J. Intell. Manuf. 23 (2012), pp. 1001–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.C. Cagnina, S.C. Esquivel, and C.A. Coello Coello, Solving engineering optimization problems with the simple constrained particle swarm optimizer, Informatica (Ljubl.) 32 (2008), pp. 319–326.
   Google Scholar
• L. Chen, J. Shen, L. Qin, and H. Chen, An improved ant colony algorithm in continuous optimization, J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 12 (2003), pp. 224–235.
   Google Scholar
• L.D. Coelho, Gaussian quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization approaches for constrained engineering design problems, Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (2010), pp. 1676–1683.
   Google Scholar
• C.A.C. Coello, Treating constraints as objectives for single-objective evolutionary optimization, Eng. Optim. 32 (2000), pp. 275–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.A.C. Coello, Use of a self-adaptive penalty approach for engineering optimization problems, Comput. Ind. 41 (2000), pp. 113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.A.C. Coello and E.M. Montes, Constraint-handling in genetic algorithms through the use of dominance-based tournament selection, Adv. Eng. Inform. 16 (2002), pp. 193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Darwin, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, John Murray, London, 1869.
   Google Scholar
• K. Deb, GeneAS: A robust optimal design technique for mechanical component design, in Evolutionary Algorithms in Engineering Applications, D. Dasgupta and Z. Michalewicz, eds., Springer, Berlin, 1997, pp. 497–514.
   Google Scholar
• K. Deb, An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 186 (2000), pp. 311–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Deb and M. Goyal, A combined genetic adaptive search (GeneAS) for engineering design, Comput. Sci. Inf. 26 (1996), pp. 30–45.
   Google Scholar
• G.G. Dimopoulos, Mixed-variable engineering optimization based on evolutionary and social metaphors, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196 (2007), pp. 803–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Dorigo and G.D. Caro, The ant colony optimization meta-heuristic, in New Ideas in Optimization, C. David, D. Marco, G. Fred, D. Dipankar, M. Pablo, P. Riccardo, and V.P. Kenneth, eds., McGraw-Hill, London, 1999, pp. 11–32.
   Google Scholar
• J. Dreo and P. Siarry, An ant colony algorithm aimed at dynamic continuous optimization, Appl. Math. Comput. 181 (2006), pp. 457–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Emami, A. Mozaffari, N.L. Azad, and B. Rezaie, An empirical investigation into the effects of chaos on different types of evolutionary crossover operators for efficient global search in complicated landscapes, Int. J. Comput. Math. 93 (2016), pp. 3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Fesanghary, M. Mahdavi, M. Minary-Jolandan, and Y. Alizadeh, Hybridizing harmony search algorithm with sequential quadratic programming for engineering optimization problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 197 (2008), pp. 3080–3091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.H. Gandomi, X.S. Yang, and A.H. Alavi, Mixed variable structural optimization using Firefly Algorithm, Comput. Struct. 89 (2011), pp. 2325–2336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.H. Gandomi, X.S. Yang, and A.H. Alavi, Cuckoo search algorithm: A metaheuristic approach to solve structural optimization problems, Eng. Comput. 29 (2013), pp. 17–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.R. Griffiths and J.C. Miles, Determining the optimal cross-section of beams, Adv. Eng. Inform. 17 (2003), pp. 59–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.Y. Guo, L. Zhang, L.L. Zhang, and J.X. Zhou, Optimal placement of sensors for structural health monitoring using improved genetic algorithms, Smart Mater. Struct. 13 (2004), pp. 528–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Hasancebi and F. Erbatur, Evaluation of crossover techniques in genetic algorithm based optimum structural design, Comput. Struct. 78 (2000), pp. 435–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. He and L. Wang, An effective co-evolutionary particle swarm optimization for constrained engineering design problems, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel. 20 (2007), pp. 89–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. He, E. Prempain, and Q.H. Wu, An improved particle swarm optimizer for mechanical design optimization problems, Eng. Optim. 36 (2004), pp. 585–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.R. Hedar and M. Fukushima, Derivative-free filter simulated annealing method for constrained continuous global optimization, J. Global Optim. 35 (2006), pp. 521–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.M. Himmelblau, Applied Nonlinear Programming, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• J.H. Holland, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control and Artificial Intelligence, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• A. Homaifar, C.X. Qi, and S.H. Lai, Constrained optimization via genetic algorithms, Simulation 62 (1994), pp. 242–253.
   Google Scholar
• X.H. Hu, R.C. Eberhart, and Y.H. Shi, Engineering optimization with particle swarm, in Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, 2003, pp. 53–57.
   Google Scholar
• S.F. Hwang and R.S. He, A hybrid real-parameter genetic algorithm for function optimization, Adv. Eng. Inform. 20 (2006), pp. 7–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.K. Kannan and S.N. Kramer, An augmented Lagrange multiplier based method for mixed-integer discrete-continuous optimization and its applications to mechanical design, J. Mech. Design 116 (1994), pp. 405–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kaveh and S. Talatahari, An improved ant colony optimization for constrained engineering design problems, Eng. Comput. 27 (2010), pp. 155–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Kennedy and R.C. Eberhart, Particle swarm optimization, in IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, IEEE, Seoul, Korea, 1995, pp. 1942–1948.
   Google Scholar
• K.S. Lee and Z.W. Geem, A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: Harmony search theory and practice, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 194 (2005), pp. 3902–3933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.P.B. Leite and B.H.V. Topping, Improved genetic operators for structural engineering optimization, Adv. Eng. Softw. 29 (1998), pp. 529–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J. Liang, A.K. Qin, P.N. Suganthan, and S. Baskar, Comprehensive learning particle swarm optimizer for global optimization of multimodal functions, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 10 (2006), pp. 281–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.K. Mehta and B. Dasgupta, A constrained optimization algorithm based on the simplex search method, Eng. Optim. 44 (2012), pp. 537–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Meyer and A. Ernst, Integrating ACO and constraint propagation, in Ant Colony Optimization and Swarm Intelligence: 4th International Workshop, ANTS 2004, Brussels, Belgium, September 5–8, 2004. Proceedings, M. Dorigo, M. Birattari, C. Blum, L.M. Gambardella, F. Mondada and T. Stützle, eds., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004, pp. 166–177.
   Google Scholar
• E. Mezura-Montes and C.A.C. Coello, An empirical study about the usefulness of evolution strategies to solve constrained optimization problems, Int. J. Gen. Syst. 37 (2008), pp. 443–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Mezura-Montes, C.A.C. Coello, J. Velazquez-Reyes, and L. Munoz-Davila, Multiple trial vectors in differential evolution for engineering design, Eng. Optim. 39 (2007), pp. 567–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Minaei-Bidgoli and W.F. Punch, Using genetic algorithms for data mining optimization in an educational web-based system, in Genetic and Evolutionary Computation — GECCO 2003: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Chicago, IL, USA, July 12–16, 2003 Proceedings, Part II, E. Cantú-Paz, J.A. Foster, K. Deb, L.D. Davis, R. Roy, U.-M. O’Reilly, H.-G. Beyer, R. Standish, G. Kendall, S. Wilson, M. Harman, J. Wegener, D. Dasgupta, M.A. Potter, A.C. Schultz, K.A. Dowsland, N. Jonoska and J. Miller, eds., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003, pp. 2252–2263.
   Google Scholar
• A.A. Mousa, W.F. Abd El-Wahed, and R.M. Rizk-Allaha, A hybrid ant colony optimization approach based local search scheme for multiobjective design optimizations, Electr. Power Syst. Res. 81 (2011), pp. 1014–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.G.H. Omran and A. Salman, Constrained optimization using CODEQ, Chaos Solitons Fract. 42 (2009), pp. 662–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Pooranian, M. Shojafar, J.H. Abawajy, and A. Abraham, An efficient meta-heuristic algorithm for grid computing, J. Comb. Optim. 30 (2015), pp. 413–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.S. Rao, Engineering Optimization: Theory and Practice, 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• E. Sandgren, Nonlinear integer and discrete programming in mechanical design, in American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Design Engineering Division (Publication) DE, 1988, pp. 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• P.S. Shelokar, P. Siarry, V.K. Jayaraman, and B.D. Kulkarni, Particle swarm and ant colony algorithms hybridized for improved continuous optimization, Appl. Math. Comput. 188 (2007), pp. 129–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Shi, and R. Eberhart, A modified particle swarm optimizer, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1998, pp. 69–73.
   Google Scholar
• J.H. Tam, Z.C. Ong, Z. Ismail, B.C. Ang, and S.Y. Khoo, Identification of material properties of composite materials using nondestructive vibrational evaluation approaches: A review, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 24 (2017), pp. 971–986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.H. Tam, Z.C. Ong, Z. Ismail, B.C. Ang, S.Y. Khoo, and W.L. Li, Inverse identification of elastic properties of composite materials using hybrid GA-ACO-PSO algorithm, Inverse Prob. Sci. Eng. 26 (2017), pp. 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.H. Tam, Z.C. Ong, C.L. Lau, Z. Ismail, B.C. Ang, and S.Y. Khoo, Identification of material properties of composite plates using Fourier-generated frequency response functions, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 14 (2017), pp. 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.F. Tsai, Global optimization of nonlinear fractional programming problems in engineering design, Eng. Optim. 37 (2005), pp. 399–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Van den Bergh and A.P. Engelbrecht, A cooperative approach to particle swarm optimization, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 8 (2004), pp. 225–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Wang, H. Sun, C.H. Li, S. Rahnamayan, and J.S. Pan, Diversity enhanced particle swarm optimization with neighborhood search, Inform. Sci. 223 (2013), pp. 119–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Wang, Z.J. Wu, S. Rahnamayan, Y. Liu, and M. Ventresca, Enhancing particle swarm optimization using generalized opposition-based learning, Inform. Sci. 181 (2011), pp. 4699–4714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.H. Zhan, J. Zhang, Y. Li, and H.S.H. Chung, Adaptive particle swarm optimization, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. B. 39 (2009), pp. 1362–1381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Zhang and H.P. Wang, Mixed-discrete nonlinear optimization with simulated annealing, Eng. Optim. 17 (1993), pp. 263–280.
   Google Scholar
• H.J. Zhang, Z. Jin, and L. Hui, A method combining genetic algorithm with simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation for linearly constrained stochastic optimization problems, J. Comb. Optim. 31 (2016), pp. 979–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X.X. Zhang and L.X. Tang, A new hybrid ant colony optimization algorithm for the vehicle routing problem, Pattern Recogn. Lett. 30 (2009), pp. 848–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.H. Zhou, G.X. Liu, and L.T. Su, A new approach to detect epistasis utilizing parallel implementation of ant colony optimization by MapReduce framework, Int. J. Comput. Math. 93 (2016), pp. 511–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Zukhri and I.V. Paputungan, A hybrid optimization algorithm based on genetic algorithm and ant colony optimization, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Appl. 4 (2013), pp. 63–75.
   Google Scholar