A computational procedure for variable selection preserving different initial conditions

References

• L. Antoni, S. Krajči and O. Krídlo, Constraint heterogeneous concept lattices and concept lattices with heterogeneous hedges, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 303 (2016), pp. 21–37. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2015.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Bai, Y. Ge, J. Wang, D. Li, Y. Liao and X. Zheng, A method for extracting rules from spatial data based on rough fuzzy sets, Knowl. Based Syst. 57 (2014), pp. 28–40. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Bělohlávek, Similarity relations in concept lattices, J. Logic Comput. 10(6) (2000), pp. 823–845. doi: 10.1093/logcom/10.6.823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Bělohlávek, P. Cordero, M. Enciso, A. Mora and V. Vychodil, Automated prover for attribute dependencies in data with grades, Int. J. Approx. Reason. 70 (2016), pp. 51–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2015.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Bělohlávek, J. Dvořák and J. Outrata, Fast factorization by similarity in formal concept analysis of data with fuzzy attributes, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 73(6) (2007), pp. 1012–1022. doi: 10.1016/j.jcss.2007.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Bělohlávek and V. Vychodil, Thresholds and shifted attributes in formal concept analysis of data with fuzzy attributes, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 11 (2006), pp. 117–130. doi: 10.1007/11787181_9
   Google Scholar
• R. Bělohlávek and V. Vychodil, Attribute dependencies for data with grades ii,, Int. J. Gen. Syst. 46(1) (2017), pp. 66–92. doi: 10.1080/03081079.2016.1205712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Benítez, J. Medina and D. Śle¸zak, Delta-information reducts and bireducts, in 2015 Conference of the International Fuzzy Systems Association and the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (IFSA- EUSFLAT-15), Gijón, Spain, J.M. Alonso, H. Bustince, and M. Reformat, eds., Atlantis Press, Gijon, 2015, pp. 1154–1160.
   Google Scholar
• M.J. Benítez-Caballero, J. Medina and E. Ramírez-Poussa, Attribute reduction in rough set theory and formal concept analysis, in Rough Sets, L. Polkowski, Y. Yao, P. Artiemjew, D. Ciucci, D. Liu, D. Śle¸zak, and B. Zielosko, eds., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017, pp. 513–525.
   Google Scholar
• M.J. Benítez-Caballero, J. Medina, E. Ramírez-Poussa and D. Śle¸zak, Bireducts with tolerance relations, Inf. Sci. 435 (2018), pp. 26–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2017.12.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Chen, J. Li, Y. Lin, G. Lin and Z. Ma, Relations of reduction between covering generalized rough sets and concept lattices, Inf. Sci. 304 (2015), pp. 16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.11.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.E. Cornejo, J. Medina and E. Ramírez-Poussa, Irreducible elements in multi-adjoint concept lattices, in International Conference on Fuzzy Logic and Technology, EUSFLAT 2013, 2013, pp. 125–131.
   Google Scholar
• M.E. Cornejo, J. Medina and E. Ramírez-Poussa, Attribute reduction in multi-adjoint concept lattices, Inf. Sci. 294 (2015), pp. 41–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.09.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.E. Cornejo, J. Medina and E. Ramírez-Poussa, On the use of irreducible elements for reducing multi-adjoint concept lattices, Knowl. Based Syst. 89 (2015), pp. 192–202. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.E. Cornejo, J. Medina and E. Ramírez-Poussa, On the use of thresholds in multi-adjoint concept lattices, Int. J. Comput. Math. 92(9) (2015), pp. 1855–1873. doi: 10.1080/00207160.2014.896078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.E. Cornejo, J. Medina and E. Ramirez-Poussa, Computing the validity of attribute implications in multi-adjoint concept lattices, in International Conference on Computational and Mathematical Methods in Science and Engineering (CMMSE 2016), vol. 2, 2016, pp. 414–423.
   Google Scholar
• M.E. Cornejo, J. Medina and E. Ramírez-Poussa, Attribute and size reduction mechanisms in multi-adjoint concept lattices, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 318 (2017), pp. 388–402. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Science and Engineering CMMSE-2015.. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2016.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.E. Cornejo, J. Medina and E. Ramírez-Poussa, Characterizing reducts in multi-adjoint concept lattices, Inf. Sci. 422 (2018), pp. 364–376. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2017.08.099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Cornelis, R. Jensen, G. Hurtado and D. Śle¸zak, Attribute selection with fuzzy decision reducts, Inf. Sci. 180 (2010), pp. 209–224. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2009.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Cornelis, J. Medina and N. Verbiest, Multi-adjoint fuzzy rough sets: Definition, properties and attribute selection, Int. J. Approx. Reason. 55 (2014), pp. 412–426. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2013.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Dai, H. Hu, W. Wu, Y. Qian and D. Huang, Maximal-discernibility-pair-based approach to attribute reduction in fuzzy rough sets, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 26(4) (Aug 2018), pp. 2174–2187. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2017.2768044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Davey and H. Priestley, Introduction to Lattices and Order, 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• S. Dias and N. Vieira, Reducing the size of concept lattices: The jbos approach, in 7th International Conference on Concept Lattices and Their Applications (CLA 2010), vol. 672, 2010, pp. 80–91.
   Google Scholar
• J.C. Díaz-Moreno and J. Medina, Multi-adjoint relation equations: Definition, properties and solutions using concept lattices, Inf. Sci. 253 (2013), pp. 100–109. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O.G. El Barbary, A.S. Salama and E.S. Atlam, Granular information retrieval using neighborhood systems, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 41(15) (2017), pp. 5737–5753. doi: 10.1002/mma.4610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Elloumi, J. Jaam, A. Hasnah, A. Jaoua and I. Nafkha, A multi-level conceptual data reduction approach based on the Lukasiewicz implication, Inf. Sci. 163(4) (2004), pp. 253–262. Information Technology. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2003.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, editors. Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Volume I: Elements of Classical Logic. Volume I of Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Springer, Netherlands, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• B. Ganter and R. Wille, Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundation, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• K. Sumangali and C.A. Kumar, Concept lattice simplification in formal concept analysis using attribute clustering, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. May 20181–17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.A. Kumar, Fuzzy clustering-based formal concept analysis for association rules mining, Appl. Artif. Intell. 26(3) (2012), pp. 274–301. doi: 10.1080/08839514.2012.648457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.A. Kumar and S. Srinivas, Concept lattice reduction using fuzzy k-means clustering, Expert Syst. Appl. 37(3) (2010), pp. 2696–2704. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Li, C.A. Kumar, C. Mei and X. Wang, Comparison of reduction in formal decision contexts, Int. J. Approx. Reason. 80 (2017), pp. 100–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2016.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Li and G. Wang, Approximate concept construction with three-way decisions and attribute reduction in incomplete contexts, Knowl. Based Syst. 91 (2016), pp. 165–178. Three-way Decisions and Granular Computing. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Liñeiro-Barea, J. Medina and I. Medina-Bulo, Towards generating fuzzy rules via fuzzy formal concept analysis, in 7th European Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Mathematics (ESCIM 2015), J. Kacprzyk, L. Koczy, and J. Medina, eds., 2015, pp. 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• V. Loia, F. Orciuoli and W. Pedrycz, Towards a granular computing approach based on formal concept analysis for discovering periodicities in data, Knowl. Based Syst. 146 (2018), pp. 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.01.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Medina, Multi-adjoint property-oriented and object-oriented concept lattices, Inf. Sci. 190 (2012), pp. 95–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2011.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Medina, Relating attribute reduction in formal, object-oriented and property-oriented concept lattices, Comput. Math. Appl. 64(6) (2012), pp. 1992–2002. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.03.087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Medina and M. Ojeda-Aciego, Towards attribute reduction in multi-adjoint concept lattices, in The 7th International Conference on Concept Lattices and Their Applications, 2010, pp. 92–103.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Pawlak, Rough sets, Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. 11 (1982), pp. 341–356. doi: 10.1007/BF01001956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Qian, J. Liang, W. Pedrycz and C. Dang, Positive approximation: An accelerator for attribute reduction in rough set theory, Artif. Intell. 174(9) (2010), pp. 597–618. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2010.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Rodríguez-Jiménez, P. Cordero, M. Enciso and A. Mora, Data mining algorithms to compute mixed concepts with negative attributes: an application to breast cancer data analysis, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 39(16) (2016), pp. 4829–4845. doi: 10.1002/mma.3814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.-W. Shao, L. Guo and C.-Z. Wang, Connections between two-universe rough sets and formal concepts, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 9(11) (mar 2018), pp. 1869–1877. doi: 10.1007/s13042-018-0803-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.K. Singh, A.K. Cherukuri and J. Li, Concepts reduction in formal concept analysis with fuzzy setting using Shannon entropy, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 8(1) (Feb 2017), pp. 179–189. doi: 10.1007/s13042-014-0313-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Tan, W. Wu, Y. Qian, J. Liang, J. Chen and J. Li, Intuitionistic fuzzy rough set-based granular structures and attribute subset selection, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 27(3) (2018), pp. 527–539. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2862870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Wei and J.-J. Qi, Relation between concept lattice reduction and rough set reduction, Knowl. Based Syst. 23(8) (2010), pp. 934–938. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Wille Restructuring lattice theory: An approach based on hierarchies of concepts, in Ordered Sets, I. Rival, ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982, pp. 445–470.
   Google Scholar
• Y.-Q. Yao, J.-S. Mi and Z.-J. Li, Attribute reduction based on generalized fuzzy evidence theory in fuzzy decision systems, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 170(1) (2011), pp. 64–75. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2011.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Zhang and F. Ma, Improved rough k-means clustering algorithm based on weighted distance measure with Gaussian function, Int. J. Comput. Math. 94(4) (2017), pp. 663–675. doi: 10.1080/00207160.2015.1124099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Zhao, Y. Yao and F. Luo, Data analysis based on discernibility and indiscernibility, Inf. Sci. 177(22) (2007), pp. 4959–4976. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2007.06.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Ziarko, Variable precision rough set model, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 46(1) (1993), pp. 39–59. doi: 10.1016/0022-0000(93)90048-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar