Convergence rates of the numerical methods for the delayed PDEs from option pricing under regime switching hard-to-borrow models

References

• M. Avellaneda and M. Lipkin, A dynamic model for hard-to-borrow stocks, Risk 6 (2009), pp. 92–97.
   Google Scholar
• M. Avellaneda and S. Zhang, Path-dependence of leveraged ETF returns, SIAM J. Financ. Math. 1 (2010), pp. 586–603. doi: 10.1137/090760805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.E. Bank and R.F. Santos, Analysis of some moving space-time finite element methods, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 30 (1993), pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1137/0730001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Chen and J.T. Ma, Numerical methods for a partial differential equation with spatial delay arising in option pricing under hard-to-borrow model, Comput. Math. Appl. 76 (2018), pp. 2129–2140. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2018.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.J. Elliott, V. Krishnamurthy and J. Sass, Moment based regression algorithms for the drift and volatility estimation in continuous-time Markov switching models, Econom. J. 11 (2008), pp. 244–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-423X.2008.00246.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.J. Elliott, K. Nishide and C.J.U. Osakwe, Heston-type stochastic volatility with a Markov switching regime, J. Futures Markets 36 (2016), pp. 902–919. doi: 10.1002/fut.21761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Florescu, R.H. Liu, M.C. Mariani and G. Sewell, Numerical schemes for option pricing in regime-switching jump diffusion models, Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 16 (2013), pp. 1–25. doi: 10.1142/S0219024913500465
   Google Scholar
• M. Hahn, S. Frühwirth-Schnatter and J. Sass, Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for parameter estimation in multidimensional continuous time Markov switching models, J. Financ. Econom. 8 (2010), pp. 88–121. doi: 10.1093/jjfinec/nbp026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.D. Hamilton, A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle, Econometrica 57 (1989), pp. 357–384. doi: 10.2307/1912559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.R. Hardy, A regime switching model of a long term stock-returns, N. Am. Actuar. J. 3 (2001), pp. 185–211.
   Google Scholar
• M.V. Jensen and L.H. Pedersen, Early option exercise: Never say never, J. Financ. Econ. 121 (2016), pp. 278–299. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.Q.M. Khaliq and R.H. Liu, New numerical scheme for pricing American option with regime-switching, Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 12 (2009), pp. 319–340. doi: 10.1142/S0219024909005245
   Google Scholar
• O.A. Ladyzenskaja, V.A. Solonnikov and N.N. Uraltseva, Linear and Quasilinear Equations of Parabolic Type, Translated from the Russian by S. Smith. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, Vol. 23, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1968.
   Google Scholar
• J.T. Ma and Z. Zhou, Convergence rates of moving mesh Rannacher methods for PDEs of Asian options pricing, J. Comput. Math. 34 (2016), pp. 265–286. doi: 10.4208/jcm.1601-m2014-0217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.T. Ma and Z. Zhou, Convergence analysis of iterative Laplace transform methods for the coupled PDEs from regime-switching option pricing, J. Sci. Comput. 75 (2018), pp. 1656–1674. doi: 10.1007/s10915-017-0604-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.Y. Ma and S.P. Zhu, Pricing American call options under a hard-to-borrow stock model, Eur. J. Appl. Math. 29 (2018), pp. 494–514. doi: 10.1017/S0956792517000262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.Y. Ma, S.P. Zhu and W.T. Chen, Pricing European call options under a hard-to-borrow stock model, Appl. Math. Comput. 357 (2019), pp. 243–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.W. Morton and D.F. Mayers, Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations, Cambridge University Press, UK, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• S.E. Shreve, Stochastic Calculus for Finance II: Continuous-Time Models, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• H. Zhou, Y.J. Wu and W.Y. Tian, Extrapolation algorithm of compact ADI approximation for two-dimensional parabolic equation, Appl. Math. Comput. 219 (2012), pp. 2875–2884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar