A novel evolutionary optimization algorithm inspired in the intelligent behaviour of the hunter spider

References

• E.P. Adorio and U.P. Diliman, MVF – multivariate test functions library in C for unconstrained global optimization. Comp. Sci. (2005). Available at June 2013. https://www.geocities.ws/eadorio/mvf.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• S. Al-Muhaideb and M.E.B. Menai, HColonies: a new hybrid metaheuristic for medical data classification. Appl. Intell. 41(1) (2014), pp. 282–298. doi:10.1007/s10489-014-0519-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A. Arasomwan and A.O. Adewumi, Improved particle swarm optimization with a collective local unimodal search for continuous optimization problems. Sci. World J. 3 (2014). doi:10.1155/2014/798129.
   Google Scholar
• T. Back, Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice: Evolution Strategies, Evolutionary Programming, Genetic Algorithms, Oxford University Press on Demand, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• E.S. Barroso, E. Parente, and A.M. Cartaxo de Melo, A hybrid PSO-GA algorithm for optimization of laminated composites. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 55 (2017), pp. 2111–2130. doi:10.1007/s00158-016-1631-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Bertocchi, A parallel algorithm for global optimization. Optimization 21(3) (1990), pp. 379–386. doi:10.1080/02331939008843559.
   Google Scholar
• F. Cheng, G. Fu, and X. Zhang, Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for optimizing the partial area under the ROC curve. Knowl. Based. Syst. 170 (2019), pp. 61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2019.01.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Chuang and L. Fan, A hybrid evolutionary algorithm based on tissue membrane systems and CMA-ES for solving numerical optimization problems. Knowl. Based. Syst. 105 (2016), pp. 38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.04.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Esmaelian, M. Tavana, F.J. Santos-Arteaga, and M. Vali, A novel genetic algorithm based method for solving continuous nonlinear optimization problems through subdividing and labeling. Measurement. (. Mahwah. N. J) 115 (2018), pp. 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• S.K.S. Fan and E. Zahara, A hybrid simplex search and particle swarm optimization for unconstrained optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181 (2007), pp. 527–548. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GEATbx: Examples of Objective Functions. Available at September 2014. https://www.pg.gda.pl/~mkwies/dyd/geadocu/fcnfun7.html.
   Google Scholar
• M. Ghaemi and M.R. Feizi-Derakhshi, Forest optimization algorithm. Expert. Syst. Appl. 41 (2014), pp. 6676–6687. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Optimization Test Functions Index. Available at June 2013. https://infinity77.net/global_optimization/test_functions.html#test-functions-index.
   Google Scholar
• Global Optimization Test Problems. Available at June 2013. https://www-optima.amp.i.kyotou.ac.jp/member/student/hedar/Hedar_files/TestGO.htm.
   Google Scholar
• S. Gupta and K. Deep, Cauchy grey wolf optimiser for continuous optimization problems. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 30 (2018a), pp. 1051–1075. doi: 10.1080/0952813X.2018.1513080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Gupta and K. Deep, Random walk grey wolf optimizer for constrained engineering optimization problems. Comput. Intell. 34 (2018b), pp. 1025–1045. doi: 10.1111/coin.12160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Gupta and K. Deep, A hybrid self-adaptive sine cosine algorithm with opposition based learning. Expert. Syst. Appl. 119 (2019a), pp. 210–230. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.10.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Gupta and K. Deep, A novel random walk grey wolf optimizer. Swarm. Evol. Comput. 44 (2019b), pp. 101–112. doi: 10.1016/j.swevo.2018.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Gupta and K. Deep, An opposition-based chaotic grey wolf optimizer for global optimization tasks. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 31 (2019c), pp. 751–779. doi: 10.1080/0952813X.2018.1554712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Gupta and K. Deep, Improved sine cosine algorithm with crossover scheme for global optimization. Knowl. Based. Syst. 165 (2019d), pp. 374–406. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Jain, V. Singh, and A. Rani, A novel nature-inspired algorithm for optimization: squirrel search algorithm. Swarm. Evol. Comput. 44 (2019), pp. 148–175. doi: 10.1016/j.swevo.2018.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Karaboga, An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization, Tech. Rep. TR06, Computer Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Erciyes University, Turkey, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• D. Karaboga and B. Akay, A comparative study of artificial bee colony algorithm. Appl. Math. Comput. 214 (2009), pp. 108–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, Particle swarm optimization. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Neu. Net. 4 (1995), pp. 1942–1948.
   Google Scholar
• M.S. Kıran and M. Gündüz, A recombination-based hybridization of particle swarm optimization and artificial bee colony algorithm for continuous optimization problems. Appl. Soft Comput. 13 (2013), pp. 2188–2203. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Kong, T. Chang, W. Dai, Q. Wang, and H. Sun, An improved artificial bee colony algorithm based on elite group guidance and combined breadth-depth search strategy. Inf. Sci. (NY) 442–443 (2018), pp. 54–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Laguna and R. Marti, Experimental Testing of Advanced Scatter Search Designs for Global Optimization of Multimodal Functions, 2002. Available at June 2013, https://www.uv.es/rmarti/paper/docs/global1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• K. Liagkouras, A new three-dimensional encoding multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with application to the portfolio optimization problem. Knowl. Based. Syst. 163 (2019), pp. 186–203. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.08.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Liang, W. Xu, C. Yue, K. Yu, H. Song, O.D. Crisalle, and B. Qu, Multimodal multi-objective optimization with differential evolution. Swarm. Evol. Comput. 44 (2019), pp. 1028–1059. doi: 10.1016/j.swevo.2018.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Liao, T. Stützle, M.A.M. de Oca, and M. Dorigo, A unified ant colony optimization algorithm for continuous optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 234 (2014), pp. 597–609. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Liu, Z. Li, P. Zhu, and W. Chen, A parallel boundary search particle swarm optimization algorithm for constrained optimization problems. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 58 (2018), pp. 1505–1522. doi:10.1007/s00158-018-1978-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Liu, P. Zhu, W. Chen, and R.J. Yang, Improved particle swarm optimization algorithm using the design of experiment and data mining techniques. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 52 (2015), pp. 813–826. doi:10.1007/s00158-015-1271-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Ma, S. Shen, M. Yu, Z. Yang, M. Fei, and H. Zhou, Multi-population techniques in nature inspired optimization algorithms: a comprehensive survey. Swarm. Evol. Comput. 44 (2019), pp. 365–387. doi: 10.1016/j.swevo.2018.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Mafarjaa, I. Aljarahb, A.A. Heidari, A.I. Hammouri, H. Faris, A.M. Al-Zoubi, and S. Mirjalili, Evolutionary population dynamics and grasshopper optimization approaches for feature selection problems. Knowl. Based. Syst. 145 (2018), pp. 25–45. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.12.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Marinaki, Y. Marinakis, and G.E. Stavroulakis, Fuzzy control optimized by a multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm for vibration suppression of smart structures. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 43 (2011), pp. 29–42. doi:10.1007/s00158-010-0552-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Meng and J.S. Pan, Monkey king evolution: a new memetic evolutionary algorithm and its application in vehicle fuel consumption optimization. Knowl. Based. Syst. 97 (2016), pp. 144–157. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Meng, J.S. Pan, and H. Xu, QUasi-Affine transformation evolutionary (QUATRE) algorithm: a cooperative swarm based algorithm for global optimization. Knowl. Based. Syst. 109 (2016), pp. 104–121. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.06.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Molga and C. Smutnicki, Test functions for optimization needs, 2005. Available at June 2013. https://www.zsd.ict.pwr.wroc.pl/files/docs/functions.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• S. Moradi, L. Fatahi, and P. Razi, Finite element model updating using Bees algorithm. Struct. Multidisc. Optim 42 (2010), pp. 283–291. doi:10.1007/s00158-010-0492-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.T. Pham, A. Ghanbarzadeh, E. Koc, S. Otri, S. Rahim, and M. Zaidi, The Bees algorithm, a novel tool for complex optimization problems. 2nd International Virtual Conference on Intelligent Production Machines and Systems IPROMS, 2006, pp. 454–459.
   Google Scholar
• D.T. Pham, Q.T. Pham, A. Ghanbarzadeh, and M. Castellani, Dynamic optimization of chemical engineering processes using the Bees Algorithm. Proceedings of the 17th World Congress, The International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC), Seoul, Korea, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Pohlheim, H. (2005). GEATbx Examples: Examples of Objective Functions. Available at June 2013. https://www.geatbx.com/download/GEATbx_ObjFunExpl_v37.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• R. Rajabioun, Cuckoo optimization algorithm. Appl. Soft. Comput. 11 (2011), pp. 5508–5518. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2011.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.U. Seckiner, Y. Eroglu, M. Emrullah, and T. Dereli, Ant colony optimization for continuous functions by using novel pheromone updating. Appl. Math. Comput. 219 (2013), pp. 4163–4175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Shah, R. Ghazali, and N.M. Nawi, Hybrid ant bee colony algorithm for volcano temperature prediction, in IMTIC 2012. CCIS, 281, B.S. Chowdhry, F.K. Shaikh, D.M.A. Hussain, M.A. Uqaili, eds., Springer, Heidelberg, 2012a, pp. 453–465.
   Google Scholar
• H. Shah, R. Ghazali, N.M. Nawi, and M.M. Deris, Global hybrid ant bee colony algorithm for training artificial neural networks, in B. Murgante et al., eds., ICCSA 2012, Part I, LNCS, Vol. 7333, 2012b, pp. 87–100.
   Google Scholar
• S.N. Sivanandam, and S.N. Deepa, Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• M. Sonmez, Discrete optimum design of truss structures using artificial bee colony algorithm. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 43 (2011), pp. 85–97. doi:10.1007/s00158-010-05515. doi: 10.1007/s00158-010-0551-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Tang, and P. Eberhard, A PSO-based algorithm designed for a swarm of mobile robots. Struct. Multidisc. Optim 44 (2011), pp. 483. doi:10.1007/s00158-010-0618-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Test functions for optimization. In Wikipedia. Available at June 2013. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_functions_for_optimization.
   Google Scholar
• X. Wu, K. Zhang, and M. Cheng, Optimal control of bioprocess systems using hybrid numerical optimization algorithms. Optimization 67(8) (2018), pp. 1287–1306. doi:10.1080/02331934.2018.1466299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Zhou, B.Y. Qu, H. Li, S.Z. Zhao, S. Nagaratnam, and Q. Zhang, Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: a survey of the state of the art. Swarm. Evol. Comput. 1(1) (2011), pp. 32–49. doi: 10.1016/j.swevo.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Zhou, G. Zhou, and J. Zhang, A hybrid glowworm swarm optimization algorithm to solve constrained multimodal functions optimization. Optimization 64(4) (2015), pp. 1057–1080. doi:10.1080/02331934.2013.793329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar