Flexible decision variables in multi-objective reservoir operation

References

• I. Basupi and Z. Kapelan, Flexible water distribution system design under future demand uncertainty, J. Water. Res. Pl.-ASCE 141(4) (2013), p. 04014067.
   Google Scholar
• F.P. Bernardo and P.M. Saraiva, Robust optimization framework for process parameter and tolerance design, AICHE J. 44(9) (1998), pp. 2007–2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Chen, A.S. Leon, and P. Hosseini, Optimizing short-term operation of a multireservoir system during transition of objectives and constraints, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, 2014. pp. 1093–1105.
   Google Scholar
• D. Chen, A.S. Leon, N.L. Gibson, and P. Hosseini, Dimension reduction of decision variables for multireservoir operation: A spectral optimization model, Water Resour. Res. 52(1) (2016), pp. 36–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Chen, A.S. Leon, P. Hosseini, N.L. Gibson, and C. Fuentes, Application of cluster analysis for finding operational patterns of multireservoir system during transition period, J. Water Resour. Plann. Manag. 143(8) (2017), p. 04017028.
   Google Scholar
• K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, Evol. Comput. 6(2) (2002), pp. 182–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.N. DiFrancesco and D.D. Tullos, Flexibility in water resources management: Review of concepts and development of assessment measures for flood management systems, J. Am. Water Resource Assoc.50(6) (2014), pp. 1527–1539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Escudero, Warsyp: A robust modeling approach for water resources system planning under uncertainty, Ann. Oper. Res. 95(1-4) (2000), pp. 313–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.A. Faber and J. Stedinger, Reservoir optimization using sampling SDP with ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) forecasts, J. Hydrol. 249(1) (2001), pp. 113–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.L. Gibson, C. Gifford-Miears, A.S. Leon, and V.S. Vasylkivska, Efficient computation of unsteady flow in complex river systems with uncertain inputs, Int. J. Comput. Math. 91(4) (2014), pp. 781–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Hanss, Applied Fuzzy Arithmetic, Springer, Stuttgart, Germany, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• J.D. Herman, P.M. Reed, H.B. Zeff, and G.W. Characklis, How should robustness be defined for water systems planning under change? J. Water. Res. Pl.-ASCE 141(10) (2015), p. 04015012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Hosseini, Multi-objective optimization of reservoir operation under uncertainty with robust and flexible decision variables, Ph.D. thesis, Oregon State University, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• B. Hu, L. Wu, and M. Marwali, On the robust solution to SCUC with load and wind uncertainty correlations, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 29(6) (2014), pp. 2952–2964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Karamouz, A. Ahmadi, and A. Moridi, Probabilistic reservoir operation using Bayesian stochastic model and support vector machine, Adv. Water Resource 32(11) (2009), pp. 1588–1600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Karimanzira, D. Schwanenberg, C. Allen, and S. Barton, Short-term hydropower optimization and assessment of operational flexibility, J. Water Resour. Plann. Manag. 142(2) (2015), p. 04015048.
   Google Scholar
• J.W. Labadie, Optimal operation of multireservoir systems: State-of-the-art review, J. Water. Res. Pl.-ASCE 130(2) (2004), pp. 93–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.S. Leon, N.L. Gibson, and C. Gifford-Miears, Toward Reduction of Uncertainty in Complex Multireservoir River Systems, Proceedings of the XIX International Conference on Computational Methods in Water Resources, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• J. Marques, M. Cunha, and D.A. Savić, Multi-objective optimization of water distribution systems based on a real options approach, Environ. Modell. Softw. 63 (2015), pp. 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.G. McIntire, V. Vasylkivska, C. Hoyle, and N. Gibson, Applying Robust Design Optimization to Large Systems, International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, ASME, 2014, pp. V02BT03A054–V02BT03A054.
   Google Scholar
• N.V. Sahinidis, Optimization under uncertainty: State-of-the-art and opportunities, Comput. Chem. Eng. 28(6) (2004), pp. 971–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Sanderson, R. Memisevic, and W. Wong, Analysing Cognitive Work of Hydroelectricity Generation in a Dynamic Deregulated Market, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 48(3), SAGE Publications, Sage CA, Los Angeles, CA, 2004, pp. 484–488.
   Google Scholar
• D. Xiu, Efficient collocational approach for parametric uncertainty analysis, Commun. Comput. Phys.2(2) (2007), pp. 293–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Xiu, Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations: A Spectral Method Approach, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• D. Xiu and J.S. Hesthaven, High-order collocation methods for differential equations with random inputs, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 27(3) (2005), pp. 1118–1139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.H. Yoo, Maximization of hydropower generation through the application of a linear programming model, J. Hydrol. (Amst) 376(1) (2009), pp. 182–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Zhang, J. Wang, and X. Wang, Review on probabilistic forecasting of wind power generation, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 32 (2014), pp. 255–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Zitzler, K. Deb, and L. Thiele, Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical results, Evol. Comput. 8(2) (2000), pp. 173–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar