Drift-preserving numerical integrators for stochastic Poisson systems

References

• A. Abdulle, D. Cohen, G. Vilmart, and K. Zygalakis, High order weak methods for stochastic differential equations based on modified equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 34 (2012), pp. A1800–A1823. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1137/110846609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Alamo and J.M. Sanz-Serna, Word combinatorics for stochastic differential equations: splitting integrators, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 18 (2019), pp. 2163–2195. MR 3927434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Anton and D. Cohen, Exponential integrators for stochastic Schrödinger equations driven by itønoise, J. Comput. Math. 36 (2018), pp. 276–309. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4208/jcm.1701-m2016-0525 MR 3771721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Anton, D. Cohen, S. Larsson, and X. Wang, Full discretization of semilinear stochastic wave equations driven by multiplicative noise, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 54 (2016), pp. 1093–1119. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1137/15M101049X. MR 3484400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Blanes and F. Casas, A concise introduction to geometric numerical integration, Monographs and Research Notes in Mathematics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2016. MR 3642447.
   Google Scholar
• L. Brugnano, M. Calvo, J.I. Montijano, and L. Rández, Energy-preserving methods for Poisson systems, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 236 (2012), pp. 3890–3904. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2012.02.033. MR 2926249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Brugnano, G. Gurioli, and F. Iavernaro, Analysis of energy and quadratic invariant preserving (EQUIP) methods, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 335 (2018), pp. 51–73. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2017.11.043. MR 3758633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Brugnano and F. Iavernaro, Line integral methods which preserve all invariants of conservative problems, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 236 (2012), pp. 3905–3919. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2012.03.026. MR 2926250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.M. Burrage and K. Burrage, Structure-preserving Runge–Kutta methods for stochastic Hamiltonian equations with additive noise, Numer. Algor. 65 (2014), pp. 519–532. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11075-013-9796-6. MR 3172331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Celledoni, M. Farré Puiggalí, E.H. Høiseth, and D. Martín de Diego, Energy-preserving integrators applied to nonholonomic systems, J. Nonlinear Sci. 29 (2019), pp. 1523–1562. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-018-9524-4. MR 3993177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Celledoni, R.I. McLachlan, D.I. McLaren, B. Owren, G.R.W. Quispel, and W.M. Wright, Energy-preserving Runge–Kutta methods, M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 43 (2009), pp. 645–649. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2009020. MR 2542869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Celledoni, B. Owren, and Y. Sun, The minimal stage, energy preserving Runge–Kutta method for polynomial Hamiltonian systems is the averaged vector field method, Math. Comput. 83 (2014), pp. 1689–1700. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-2014-02805-6. MR 3194126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Chen, D. Cohen, R. D'Ambrosio, and A. Lang, Drift-preserving numerical integrators for stochastic Hamiltonian systems, Adv. Comput. Math. 46 (2020), pp. 1–22. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10444-020-09771-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Cohen, On the numerical discretisation of stochastic oscillators, Math. Comput. Simul. 82 (2012), pp. 1478–1495. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2012.02.004. MR 2922170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Cohen, J. Cui, J. Hong, and L. Sun, Exponential integrators for stochastic Maxwell's equations driven by itô noise, J. Comput. Phys. 410 (2020), pp. 109382.Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999-12030156X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Cohen and G. Dujardin, Energy-preserving integrators for stochastic Poisson systems, Commun. Math. Sci. 12 (2014), pp. 1523–1539. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4310/CMS.2014.v12.n8.a7. MR 3210739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Cohen and E. Hairer, Linear energy-preserving integrators for Poisson systems, BIT 51 (2011), pp. 91–101. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-011-0310-z. MR 2784654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Cohen, S. Larsson, and M. Sigg, A trigonometric method for the linear stochastic wave equation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 51 (2013), pp. 204–222. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1137/12087030X. MR 3033008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Cohen and M. Sigg, Convergence analysis of trigonometric methods for stiff second-order stochastic differential equations, Numer. Math. 121 (2012), pp. 1–29. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-011-0426-8. MR 2909913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Cui, J. Hong, and D. Sheng, Convergence in density of splitting AVF scheme for stochastic Langevin equation, arXiv (2019) Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.03439.
   Google Scholar
• H. de la Cruz, J.C. Jimenez, and J.P. Zubelli, Locally linearized methods for the simulation of stochastic oscillators driven by random forces, BIT 57 (2017), pp. 123–151. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-016-0620-2. MR 3608313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Gonzalez, Time integration and discrete Hamiltonian systems, J. Nonlinear Sci. 6 (1996), pp. 449–467. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s003329900018. MR 1411343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Hairer, Energy-preserving variant of collocation methods, JNAIAM. J. Numer. Anal. Ind. Appl. Math. 5 (2010), pp. 73–84. MR 2833602.
   Google Scholar
• E. Hairer, C. Lubich, and G. Wanner, Geometric numerical integration illustrated by the Störmer–Verlet method, Acta Numer.12 (2003), pp. 399–450. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962492902000144. MR 2249159.
   Google Scholar
• E. Hairer, C. Lubich, and G. Wanner, Geometric Numerical Integration: Structure-Preserving Algorithms for Ordinary Differential Equations, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• M. Han, Q. Ma, and X. Ding, High-order stochastic symplectic partitioned Runge–Kutta methods for stochastic Hamiltonian systems with additive noise, Appl. Math. Comput. 346 (2019), pp. 575–593. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2018.10.041. MR 3873562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.D. Holm and T.M. Tyranowski, Stochastic discrete Hamiltonian variational integrators, BIT 58 (2018), pp. 1009–1048. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-018-0720-2. MR 3882980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Hong, R. Scherer, and L. Wang, Midpoint rule for a linear stochastic oscillator with additive noise, Neural Parallel Sci. Comput. 14 (2006), pp. 1–12. MR 2359504.
   Google Scholar
• F. Iavernaro and D. Trigiante, High-order symmetric schemes for the energy conservation of polynomial Hamiltonian problems, JNAIAM J. Numer. Anal. Ind. Appl. Math. 4 (2009), pp. 87–101. MR 2598786.
   Google Scholar
• H. Kojima, Invariants preserving schemes based on explicit Runge–Kutta methods, BIT 56 (2016), pp. 1317–1337. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-016-0608-y. MR 3576613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Komori, D. Cohen, and K. Burrage, Weak second order explicit exponential Runge–Kutta methods for stochastic differential equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 39 (2017), pp. A2857–A2878. Available at https://doi-org.proxy.ub.umu.se/https://doi.org/10.1137/15M1041341. MR 3735294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Leimkuhler and S. Reich. Simulating Hamiltonian dynamics, Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics Vol. 14, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004. MR 2132573.
   Google Scholar
• M. Liao, Random motion of a rigid body, J. Theor. Probab. 10 (1997), pp. 201–211. Available at https://doi-org.proxy.ub.umu.se/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022654717555. MR 1432623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.I. McLachlan, G.R.W. Quispel, and N. Robidoux, Geometric integration using discrete gradients, R. Soc. Lond. Philos. Trans. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 357 (1999), pp. 1021–1045. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1999.0363. MR 1694701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.N. Milstein, Y.M. Repin, and M.V. Tretyakov, Symplectic integration of Hamiltonian systems with additive noise, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 39 (2002), pp. 2066–2088. Available at https://doi-org.proxy.ub.umu.se/https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036142-901387440. MR 1897950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.N. Milstein and M.V. Tretyakov, Stochastic Numerics for Mathematical Physics, Scientific Computation, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10063-9. MR 2069903.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Miyatake, An energy-preserving exponentially-fitted continuous stage Runge–Kutta method for Hamiltonian systems, BIT 54 (2014), pp. 777–799. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-014-0474-4. MR 3259826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Miyatake and J.C. Butcher, A characterization of energy-preserving methods and the construction of parallel integrators for Hamiltonian systems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 54 (2016), pp. 1993–2013. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1137/15M1020861. MR 3516866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.R.W. Quispel and D.I. McLaren, A new class of energy-preserving numerical integration methods, J. Phys. A 41 (2008), pp. 045206.
   Google Scholar
• J.M. Sanz-Serna and M.P. Calvo, Numerical Hamiltonian problems, Applied Mathematics and Mathematical Computation Vol. 7, Chapman & Hall, London, 1994. MR 1270017.
   Google Scholar
• H. Schurz, Analysis and discretization of semi-linear stochastic wave equations with cubic nonlinearity and additive space-time noise, Discr Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 1 (2008), pp. 353–363. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2008.1.353. MR 2379913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Seesselberg, H.P. Breuer, F. Petruccione, J. Honerkamp, and H. Mais, Simulation of one-dimensional noisy hamiltonian systems and their application to particle storage rings, Z. Phys.C62 (1994), pp. 63–73.
   Google Scholar
• M.J. Senosiain and A. Tocino, A review on numerical schemes for solving a linear stochastic oscillator, BIT 55 (2015), pp. 515–529. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-014-0507-z. MR 3348201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.H. Strømmen Melbø and D.J. Higham, Numerical simulation of a linear stochastic oscillator with additive noise, Appl. Numer. Math. 51 (2004), pp. 89–99. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2004.02.003. MR 2083326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Tasaka, S. Satoh, T. Hatanaka, and K. Yamada, Stochastic stabilization of rigid body motion of a spacecraft on SE(3), Int. J. Control. 94 (2021), pp. 1–8. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2019.1637544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Vilmart, Weak second order multirevolution composition methods for highly oscillatory stochastic differential equations with additive or multiplicative noise, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 36 (2014), pp. A1770–A1796. Available at https://doi-org.proxy.ub.umu.se/https://doi.org/10.1137/130935331. MR 3246903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Walter, O. Gonzalez, and J.H. Maddocks, On the stochastic modeling of rigid body systems with application to polymer dynamics, Multiscale Model. Simul. 8 (2010), pp. 1018–1053. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1137/090765705. MR 2644322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Wang and X. Wu, Functionally-fitted energy-preserving integrators for Poisson systems, J. Comput. Phys. 364 (2018), pp. 137–152. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.03.015. MR 3787423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Wu, B. Wang, and W. Shi, Efficient energy-preserving integrators for oscillatory Hamiltonian systems, J. Comput. Phys. 235 (2013), pp. 587–605. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2012.10.015. MR 3017613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Zhou, J. Zhang, J. Hong, and S. Song, Stochastic symplectic Runge–Kutta methods for the strong approximation of Hamiltonian systems with additive noise, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 325 (2017), pp. 134–148. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2017.04.050. MR 3658901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar