FDM-PINN: Physics-informed neural network based on fictitious domain method

References

• A. Arzani, J.X. Wang, and R.M. D'Souza, Uncovering near-wall blood flow from sparse data with physics-informed neural networks, Phys. Fluids 33 (2021), pp. 071905.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Bai, T. Chaolu, and S. Bilige, The application of improved physics-informed neural network (IPINN) method in finance, Nonlinear Dyn. 107 (2022), pp. 3655–3667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.G. Baydin, B.A. Pearlmutter, A.A. Radul, and J.M. Siskind, Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey, J. March. Learn. Res. 18 (2018), pp. 1–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Berg and K. Nyström, A unified deep artificial neural network approach to partial differential equations in complex geometries, Neurocomputing 317 (2018), pp. 28–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Cai, Z. Wang, S. Wang, P. Perdikaris, and G.E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks for heat transfer problems, J. Heat Transfer. 143 (2021),pp. 060801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Chen, L. Lu, G.E. Karniadakis, and L. Dal Negro, Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in nano-optics and metamaterials, Opt. Express. 28 (2020), pp. 11618–11633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Desai, M. Mattheakis, H. Joy, P. Protopapas, and S. Roberts, One-shot transfer learning of physics-informed neural networks, preprint (2021). Available at arXiv:2110.11286.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Gao and M.K. Ng, Wasserstein generative adversarial uncertainty quantification in physics-informed neural networks, J. Comput. Phys. 463 (2022), pp. 111270.
   Google Scholar
• R. Glowinski and Q. He, A least-squares/fictitious domain method for linear elliptic problems with robin boundary conditions, Commun. Comput. Phys. 9 (2011), pp. 587–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Glowinski, T.W. Pan, T.I. Hesla, and D.D. Joseph, A distributed lagrange multiplier/fictitious domain method for particulate flows, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 25 (1999), pp. 755–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Glowinski, T.W. Pan, and J. Periaux, A fictitious domain method for Dirichlet problem and applications, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 111 (1994), pp. 283–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Goswami, C. Anitescu, S. Chakraborty, and T. Rabczuk, Transfer learning enhanced physics informed neural network for phase-field modeling of fracture, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 106 (2020), pp. 102447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. He, R. Glowinski, and X.P. Wang, A least-squares/fictitious domain method for incompressible viscous flow around obstacles with Navier slip boundary condition, J. Comput. Phys. 366 (2018), pp. 281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Huang, Z. Zhang, and X. Zhang, A direct-forcing immersed boundary method for incompressible flows based on physics-informed neural network, Fluids 7 (2022), pp. 56.
   Google Scholar
• M.A. Hyman, Non-iterative numerical solution of boundary-value problems, Appl. Sci. Res. Section B 2 (1952), pp. 325–351.
   Google Scholar
• A.D. Jagtap, K. Kawaguchi, and G. Em Karniadakis, Locally adaptive activation functions with slope recovery for deep and physics-informed neural networks, Proc. R. Soc. A 476 (2020), pp. 20200334.
   Google Scholar
• A.D. Jagtap, K. Kawaguchi, and G.E. Karniadakis, Adaptive activation functions accelerate convergence in deep and physics-informed neural networks, J. Comput. Phys. 404 (2020), pp. 109136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Kadeethum, T.M. Jørgensen, and H.M. Nick, Physics-informed Neural Networks for Solving Inverse Problems of Nonlinear Biot's Equations: Batch Training, 54th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, OnePetro, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• E. Kharazmi, Z. Zhang, and G.E. Karniadakis, Variational physics-informed neural networks for solving partial differential equations, preprint (2019). Available at arXiv:1912.00873.
   Google Scholar
• A. Krishnapriyan, A. Gholami, S. Zhe, R. Kirby, and M.W. Mahoney, Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks, Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 34 (2021), pp. 26548–26560.
   Google Scholar
• I.E. Lagaris, A. Likas, and D.I. Fotiadis, Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 9 (1998), pp. 987–1000.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• H. Lee and I.S. Kang, Neural algorithm for solving differential equations, J. Comput. Phys. 91 (1990), pp. 110–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.L. Loh, On latin hypercube sampling, Ann. Stat. 24 (1996), pp. 2058–2080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Lu, X. Meng, Z. Mao, and G.E. Karniadakis, DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equations, SIAM Rev. 63(1) (2021), pp. 208–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Lu, R. Pestourie, W. Yao, Z. Wang, F. Verdugo, and S.G. Johnson, Physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for inverse design, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 43 (2021), pp. B1105–B1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Mattey and S. Ghosh, A physics informed neural network for time-dependent nonlinear and higher order partial differential equations, preprint (2021). Available at arXiv:2106.07606.
   Google Scholar
• C. Oszkinat, S.E. Luczak, and I. Rosen, Uncertainty quantification in estimating blood alcohol concentration from transdermal alcohol level with physics-informed neural networks, IEEE Trans. Neural. Netw. Learn. Syst. 2022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Pang, L. Lu, and G.E. Karniadakis, fPINNs: fractional physics-informed neural networks, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 41 (2019), pp. A2603–A2626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G.E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys. 378 (2019), pp. 686–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Rao, H. Sun, and Y. Liu, Physics informed deep learning for computational elastodynamics without labeled data, preprint (2020). Available at arXiv:2006.08472.
   Google Scholar
• J. Sirignano and K. Spiliopoulos, DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys. 375 (2018), pp. 1339–1364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I.H. Sloan and H. Woźniakowski, When are quasi-Monte Carlo algorithms efficient for high dimensional integrals?, J. Complex. 14 (1998), pp. 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.P. van Milligen, V. Tribaldos, and J. Jiménez, Neural network differential equation and plasma equilibrium solver, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995), pp. 3594–3597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Wang, X. Yu, and P. Perdikaris, When and why pinns fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspective, J. Comput. Phys. 449 (2022), pp. 110768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.L. Wight and J. Zhao, Solving Allen–Cahn and Cahn–Hilliard equations using the adaptive physics informed neural networks, preprint (2020). Available at arXiv:2007.04542.
   Google Scholar
• L. Yang, X. Meng, and G.E. Karniadakis, B-pinns: Bayesian physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problems with noisy data, J. Comput. Phys. 425 (2021), pp. 109913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Yang and P. Perdikaris, Adversarial uncertainty quantification in physics-informed neural networks, J. Comput. Phys. 394 (2019), pp. 136–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Yu, L. Lu, X. Meng, and G.E. Karniadakis, Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problems, Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 393 (2022), pp. 114823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Zhang, L. Guo, and G.E. Karniadakis, Learning in modal space: solving time-dependent stochastic PDES using physics-informed neural networks, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 42 (2020), pp. A639–A665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Zhang and Q. He, The least-square/fictitious domain method based on Navier slip boundary condition for simulation of flow–particle interaction, Appl. Math. Comput. 415 (2022), pp. 126687.
   Google Scholar