Defect deferred correction method for two domain natural convection problem

References

• M. Aggul and A. Labovsky, A high accuracy minimally invasive regularization technique for Navier–Stokes equations at high Reynolds number, Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 33 (2016), pp. 814–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Aggul, J.M. Connors, D. Erkmen, and A.E. Labovsky, A defect-deferred correction method for fluid–fluid interaction, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 56 (4) (2018), pp. 2484–2512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Connors, An ensemble-based conventional turbulence model for fluid–fluid interaction, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model. 15 (2018), pp. 492–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Connors and R.D. Dolan, Stability of two conservative, high-order fluid–fluid coupling methods, Adv. Appl. Math. Mech. 11 (6) (2019), pp. 1287–1338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Connors and B. Ganis, Stability of algorithms for a two domain natural convection problem and observed model uncertainty, Comput. Geosci. 15 (3) (2011), pp. 509–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Connors and J.S. Howell, A fluid-fluid interaction method using decoupled subproblems and differing time steps, Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 28 (4) (2012), pp. 1283–1308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Connors, J.S. Howell, and W.J. Layton, Partitioned time stepping for a parabolic two domain problem, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47 (5) (2009), pp. 3526–3549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Connors, J.S. Howell, and W.J. Layton, Decoupled time stepping methods for fluid-fluid interaction, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 50 (3) (2012), pp. 1297–1319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Erkmen and A.E. Labovsky, Defect-deferred correction method for the two-domain convection-dominated convection–diffusion problem, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 450 (1) (2017), pp. 180–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.J. Ervin and H. Lee, Defect correction method for viscoelastic fluid flows at high Weissenberg number, Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 22 (1) (2006), pp. 145–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Frank and C.W. Ueberhuber, Iterated defect correction for the efficient solution of stiff systems of ordinary differential equations, BIT Numer. Math.17 (2) (1977), pp. 146–159.
   Google Scholar
• G.P. Galdi, An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of the Navier–Stokes Equations, Springer Tracts in Natural Philosophy, Vol. I, Springer-Verlag, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• F. Hecht, New development in FreeFem++, J. Numer. Math. 20 (3-4) (2012), pp. 251–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.Z. Huang, Y.N. He, and X.L. Feng, A new defect-correction method for the stationary Navier–Stokes equations based on local Gauss integration, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 35 (9) (2012), pp. 1033–1046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.Z. Huang, X.L. Feng, and H.Y. Su, Two-level defect-correction locally stabilized finite element method for the steady Navier–Stokes equations, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 14 (2) (2013), pp. 1171–1181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.Z. Huang, X.L. Feng, and Y.N. He, Two-level defect-correction Oseen iterative stabilized finite element methods for the stationary Navier–Stokes equations, Appl. Math. Model. 37 (3) (2013), pp. 728–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Labovsky, A defect correction method for the evolutionary convection–diffusion problem with increased time accuracy, Comput. Meth. Appl. Math. 9 (2) (2009), pp. 154–164.
   Google Scholar
• A. Labovsky, A defect correction method for the time-dependent Navier–Stokes equations, Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ.25 (1) (2009), pp. 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Layton and H.K. Lee, A defect-correction method for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations, Appl. Math. Comput. 129 (2002), pp. 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Li and P.Z. Huang, A two-step decoupled finite element algorithm for a nonlinear fluid–fluid interaction problem, Univ. Politeh. Buchar. Sci. Bull. Ser. A Appl. Math. Phys. 81 (2019), pp. 107–118.
   Google Scholar
• J. Li, P.Z. Huang, C. Zhang, and G.H. Guo, A linear, decoupled fractional time-stepping method for the nonlinear fluid–fluid interaction, Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 35 (5) (2019), pp. 1873–1889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Li, P.Z. Huang, J. Su, and Z.X. Chen, A linear, stabilized, non-spatial iterative, partitioned time stepping method for the nonlinear Navier–Stokes/Navier–Stokes interaction model, Bound. Value Probl. 2019 (1) (2019), pp. 115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Li, P.Z. Huang, and Y.N. He, Grad-div stabilized finite element schemes for the fluid–fluid interaction model, Commun. Comput. Phys. 30 (2) (2021), pp. 536–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Li, P.Z. Huang, and Y.N. He, An unconditionally energy stable finite element scheme for a nonlinear fluid–fluid interaction model, IMA J. Numer. Anal. (2023). doi: 10.1093/imanum/drac086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Li, P.Z. Huang, and Y.N. He, Second order unconditionally stable and convergent linearized scheme for a fluid–fluid interaction model, J. Comput. Math. 41 (2023), pp. 72–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.L. Lions, R. Temam, and S. Wang, Models for the coupled atmosphere and ocean (CAO I), Comput. Mech. Adv. 1 (1993), pp. 5–54.
   Google Scholar
• J.L. Lions, R. Temam, and S. Wang, Numerical analysis of the coupled atmosphere–ocean models (CAO II), Comput. Mech. Adv. 1 (1993), pp. 55–119.
   Google Scholar
• J.L. Lions, R. Temam, and S. Wang, Mathematical theory for the coupled atmosphere–ocean models (CAO III), J. Math. Pures. Appl. 74 (1995), pp. 105–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.L. Minion, Semi-implicit spectral deferred correction methods for ordinary differential equations, Comm. Math. Sci. 1 (3) (2003), pp. 471–500.
   Google Scholar
• M.L. Minion, Semi-implicit projection methods for incompressible flow based on spectral deferred corrections, Appl. Numer. Math. 48 (3–4) (2004), pp. 369–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.W. Ong and R.J. Spiteri, Deferred correction methods for ordinary differential equations, J. Sci. Comput. 83 (3) (2020), pp. 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.J. Shen, D.F. Han, and X.P. Shao, Modified two-grid method for solving coupled Navier–Stokes/Darcy model based on Newton iteration, Appl. Math. J. Chinese Univ. 30 (2) (2015), pp. 127–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.D. Skeel, Atheoretical framework for proving accuracy results for deferred correction, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 19 (1982), pp. 171–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.N. Yang and P.Z. Huang, A sensitivity study of the artificial viscosity in defect deferred correction method for the coupled Stokes/Darcy model, Math. Commun. 27 (2022), pp. 187–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.N. Yang and P.Z. Huang, Defect deferred correction method for the non-stationary coupled Stokes/Darcy model, Filomat 36 (1) (2022), pp. 15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.H. Zeng, P.Z. Huang, and Y.N. He, Deferred defect-correction finite element method for the Darcy–Brinkman model, Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 101 (11) (2021), pp. e202000285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar