Computationally efficient techniques for spatial regression with differential regularization

References

• P.R. Amestoy, T.A. Davis, and I.S. Duff, Algorithm 837: AMD, an approximate minimum degree ordering algorithm, ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 30(3) (sep 2004), pp. 381–388. ISSN 0098-3500. doi: 10.1145/1024074.1024081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Arnone, L. Azzimonti, F. Nobile, and L.M. Sangalli, Modeling spatially dependent functional data via regression with differential regularization, J. Multivar. Anal. 170 (2019), pp. 275–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Arnone, L.M. Sangalli, and A. Vicini, Smoothing spatio-temporal data with complex missing data patterns, Stat. Model. 0(0) (2021), pp. 1471082X211057959.
   Google Scholar
• E. Arnone, A. Clemente, L.M. Sangalli, E. Lila, J. Ramsay, and L. Formaggia, fdaPDE: Physics-Informed Spatial and Functional Data Analysis, (2022). Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fdaPDE. R package version 1.1-16.
   Google Scholar
• L. Azzimonti, F. Nobile, L.M. Sangalli, and P. Secchi, Mixed finite elements for spatial regression with PDE penalization, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantif. 2(1) (2014), pp. 305–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Baramidze, M.-J. Lai, and C. Shum, Spherical splines for data interpolation and fitting, SIAM. J. Sci. Comput. 28(1) (2006), pp. 241–259.ISSN 1064-8275.doi: 10.1137/040620722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.M. Bates and G. Wahba, A truncated singular value decomposition and other methods for generalized cross-validation, Tech. Report 715, Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• M.S. Bernardi, L.M. Sangalli, G. Mazza, and J.O. Ramsay, A penalized regression model for spatial functional data with application to the analysis of the production of waste in Venice province, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 31(1) (2017), pp. 23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Chung, J. Hanson, and S. Pollak, Statistical analysis on brain surfaces. Technical report, University of WisconsinMadison, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• P. Craven and G. Wahba, Smoothing noisy data with spline functions: estimating the correct degree of smoothing by the method of generalized cross-validation, Numer. Math. 31 (1978/79), pp. 377–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.A. Davis, Algorithm 832: Umfpack v4.3 — an unsymmetric-pattern multifrontal method, ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 30(2) (jun 2004), pp. 196–199. ISSN 0098-3500.. doi: 10.1145/992200.992206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.W. Eaton, D. Bateman, S. Hauberg, and R. Wehbring, GNU Octave version 7.3.0 manual: a high-level interactive language for numerical computations, (2022). Available at https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/v7.3.0/.
   Google Scholar
• B. Ettinger, S. Perotto, and L.M. Sangalli, Spatial regression models over two-dimensional manifolds, Biometrika 103(1) (2016), pp. 71–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.L. Eubank, Nonparametric Regression and Spline Smoothing, 2nd ed., CRC Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• R.L. Eubank, C. Huang, Y.M. Maldonado, N. Wang, S. Wang, and R.J. Buchanan, Smoothing spline estimation in varying-coefficient models, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 66(3) (2004), pp. 653–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Ferraty and P. Vieu, Nonparametric Functional Data Analysis: Theory and Practice, Vol. 76, Springer, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• R.A. Fisher, Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population, Biometrika 10(4) (1915), pp. 507–521.
   Google Scholar
• D.A. Girard, A fast 'Monte-Carlo cross-validation' procedure for large least squares problems, Numer. Math. 56(1) (1989), pp. 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.F. Glasser, S.N. Sotiropoulos, J.A. Wilson, T.S. Coalson, B. Fischl, J.L. Andersson, J. Xu, S. Jbabdi, M. Webster, J.R. Polimeni, D.C. Van Essen, M. Jenkinson, and W.U.-Minn HCP Consortium, The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the human connectome project, NeuroImage 80 (2013), pp. 105–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Golub, M. Heath, and G. Wahba, Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter, Technometrics 21(2) (1979), pp. 215–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.H. Golub and U. von Matt, Generalized cross-validation for large-scale problems, J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 6(1) (1997), pp. 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.J. Green and B.W. Silverman, Nonparametric Regression and Generalized Linear Models, 1stn ed., Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• P.J. Green and B.W. Silverman, Nonparametric Regression and Generalized Linear Models, Volume 58 of Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, Chapman & Hall, London, 1994. ISBN 0-412-30040-0. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-4473-3. A roughness penalty approach.
   Google Scholar
• C. Gu, Cross-validating non-Gaussian data, J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 1(2) (1992), pp. 169–179.
   Google Scholar
• T. Hastie and R. Tibshirani, Generalized Additive Models, Chapman Hall, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• M.F. Hutchinson, A stochastic estimator of the trace of the influence matrix for Laplacian smoothing splines, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 18(3) (1989), pp. 1059–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.F. Hutchinson and F.R. de Hoog, Smoothing noisy data with spline functions, Numer. Math. 47(1) (1985), pp. 99–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.F. Hutchinson and F.R. de Hoog, An efficient method for calculating smoothing splines using orthogonal transformations, Numer. Math. 50 (1986/87), pp. 311–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Kokoszka and M. Reimherr, Introduction to Functional Data Analysis, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• S. Konishi and G. Kitagawa, Information Criteria and Statistical Modeling, Springer Publishing Company, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• M.-J. Lai and L.L. Schumaker, Spline Functions on Triangulations, Volume 110 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007. ISBN 978-0-521-87592-9; 0-521-87592-7. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511721588.
   Google Scholar
• M.-J. Lai and L. Wang, Bivariate penalized splines for regression, Stat. Sin. 23(3) (2013), pp. 1399–1417. ISSN 1017-0405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.-H. Lai and B.C. Vemuri, Sherman–Morrison–Woodbury-formula-based algorithms for the surface smoothing problem, Linear Algebra Appl. 265(1–3) (1997), pp. 203–229.
   Google Scholar
• E. Lila, J.A.D. Aston, and L.M. Sangalli, Smooth principal component analysis over two-dimensional manifolds with an application to neuroimaging, Ann. Appl. Stat. 10(4) (2016), pp. 1854–1879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2021. Available at https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• J.O. Ramsay and B.W. Silverman, Functional data analysis, (2008). Available at İnternet Adresi: http.
   Google Scholar
• D. Ruppert, M.P. Wand, and R.J. Carroll, Semiparametric Regression, Vol. 12, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Saad, Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems, 2nd ed., Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2003. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898718003
   Google Scholar
• Y. Saad and M.H. Schultz, Gmres: A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 7(3) (1986), pp. 856–869. doi: 10.1137/0907058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.M. Sangalli, Spatial regression with partial differential equation regularization, Int. Stat. Rev. 89(3) (2021), pp. 505–531. doi: 10.1111/insr.12444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Sario, M. Nakai, C. Wang, and L.O. Chung, Classification Theory of Riemannian Manifolds, 1sted., Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• J. Sherman and W. Morrison, Adjustment of an inverse matrix corresponding to a change in one element of a given matrix, Ann. Math. Stat. 21(1) (1950), pp. 124–127.
   Google Scholar
• F. Utreras, Optimal smoothing of noisy data using spline functions, SIAM J. Sci. and Stat. Comput. 2(3) (1981), pp. 349–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.A. van der Vorst, BI-CGSTAB: A fast and smoothly converging variant of BI-CG for the solution of nonsymmetric linear systems, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 13(2) (1992), pp. 631–644. doi: 10.1137/0913035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Wahba, Spline Models for Observational Data, Volume 59 of CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 1990. ISBN 0-89871-244-0. doi: 10.1137/1.9781611970128.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Wang, Smoothing Splines: Methods and Applications, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• L. Wang, G. Wang, M.-J. Lai, and L. Gao, Efficient estimation of partially linear models for spatial data over complex domains, Stat. Sin. 30 (2020), pp. 347–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Wilhelm and L.M. Sangalli, Generalized spatial regression with differential regularization, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 86(13) (2016), pp. 2497–2518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.N. Wood, Modelling and smoothing parameter estimation with multiple quadratic penalties, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 62 (2000), pp. 413–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.N. Wood, Stable and efficient multiple smoothing parameter estimation for generalized additive models, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 99 (2004), pp. 673–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.N. Wood, Generalized Additive Models, Texts in Statistical Science Series, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2017. ISBN 978-1-4987-2833-1. An introduction with R.
   Google Scholar
• S.N. Wood, M.V. Bravington, and S.L. Hedley, Soap film smoothing, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Stat. Methodol.) 70(5) (2008), pp. 931–955.
   Google Scholar
• M.A. Woodbury, Inverting Modified Matrices, Memorandum Report 42, Statistical Research Group, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 1950.
   Google Scholar