A moving horizon approach to a noncontinuum state estimation

References

• Aguilar-Lopez, R., & Martinez-Guerra, R. (2007). Robust state estimation for repetitive operating mode process: Application to sequencing batch reactors. Chemical Engineering Journal, 126, 155–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baglietto, M., Battistelli, G., & Scardovi, L. (2007). Active mode observation of switching linear systems. Automatica, 43, 1442–1449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baglietto, M., Battistelli, G., & Scardovi, L. (2009). Active mode observation of switching systems based on set-valued estimation of the continuous state. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 19, 1521–1540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bemporad, A., Mignone, D., & Morari, M. (1999). Moving horizon estimation for hybrid systems and fault detection. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, San Diego, CA, 2471–2475.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, H., Korte, B. H., & Vygen, J. (2008). Combinatorial optimization: Theory and algorithms. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, L., Rajamanoharan, S., & Williams, B. C. (2006). Active estimation for switching linear dynamic systems. In Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (pp. 137–144). San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Domlan, E. A., Ragot, J., & Maquin, D. (2007). Mode estimation for switching systems. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference (pp. 11–13). New York.
   Google Scholar
• Doucet, A., & Andrieu, C. (2001). Iterative algorithms for state estimation of jump Markov linear systems. IEEE Transactions On Signal Processing, 49(6), 1216–1227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., & Krishnamurthy, V. (2001). Optimal sensor scheduling for hidden Markov model state estimation. International Journal of Control, 74, 1737–1742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forney, D. G. (1973). The Viterbi algorithm. Proceedings of the IEEE, 61(3), 268–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghahramani, S. Z. (1999). A unifying review of linear gaussian models. Neural Computation, 11, 305–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, G. C., & Quevedo, D. E. (2003). Finite alphabet control and estimation. International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, 1(4), 412–430.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, G. C., & Quevedo, D. E. (2005). Moving horizon design of discrete coefficient fir filters. IEEE Transactions On Signal Processing, 53(6), 412–430.
   Google Scholar
• Hofbaur, M. W., & Williams, B. C. (2002). Mode estimation of probalistic hybrid systems. In C. J. Tomlin & M. R. Greenstreet (Eds.), HSCC (pp. 253–266). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, U. N. (2003). Hybrid Bayesian networks for reasons about complex systems (PhD dissertation). Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Olanrewaju, M. J., & Al-Arfaj, M. A. (2006). Estimator-based control of reactive distillation: Application of an extended Kalman filtering. Chemical Engineering Science, 61(10), 3386–3399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, M., & Miller., D. (1997). Low-delay optimal map state estimation in HMM's with application to symbol decoding. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 4(10), 289–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quevedo, D. E., Goodwin, G. C., & De Dona, J. A. (2007). Multistep detector for linear ISI-channels incorporating degrees of belief in past estimates. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 55(11), 55–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabiner, L. R. (1989). Tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2), 257–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, C. V., & Rawlings, J. B. (2002). Constrained process monitoring: Moving horizon approach. AIChE Journal, 48(1), 97–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawlings, J. B., & Bakshi, B. R. (2006). Particle filtering and moving horizon estimation. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 30, 1529–1541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, R. Y. & Kroese, D. P. (2008). Simulation and the Monte Carlo method. Hoboken: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, T., Gustufsson, F., & Hunsson, A. (2003). A note on state estimation as a convex optimization problem. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Vol. 6 (pp. 61–64). Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Senthil, R., Janarthanan, K., & Prakash, J. (2006). Nonlinear state estimation using fuzzy Kalman filter. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 45(25), 8678–8688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, X., & Huang, B. (2010). Constrained Bayesian estimation: A comparative study and a new particle filter based approach. Journal of Process Control, 143–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson, H. W. (1985). Kalman filtering: Theory and application. New York: IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, R., Chiuso, A., & Soatto, S. (2002). Observability and identifiability of jump linear systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 41st (pp. 3614–3619). Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, D., Kennedy, R. A., & Pulford, G. W. (1992). Block decision feedback equalization. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 40(2), 255–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar