Control configuration selection for bilinear systems via generalised Hankel interaction index array

References

• Al-Baiyat, S.A., Bettayeb, M., & Al-Saggaf, U.M. (1994). New model reduction scheme for bilinear systems. International Journal of Systems Science, 25, 1631–1642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baur, U., & Benner, P. (2008). Cross-Gramian based model reduction for data-sparse systems. Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis, 31, 256–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, P., Breiten, T., & Damm, T. (2011). Generalised tangential interpolation for model reduction of discrete-time MIMO bilinear systems. International Journal of Control, 84, 1398–1407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, P., & Damm, T. (2011). Lyapunov equations, energy functionals, and model order reduction of bilinear and stochastic systems. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 49, 686–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bristol, E.H. (1966). On a new measure of interaction for multivariable process control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 11, 133–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bristol, E.H. (1978). Recent results on interaction in multivariable process control. 71st AIChE Conference, Houston, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Brockett, R.W. (1970). Finite-dimensional linear system. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, A., & Salgado, M.E. (2000). Gramian based interaction measure. In Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (pp. 5020–5022). Sydney: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Couchman, I.J., Kerrigan, E.C., & Böhm, C. (2011). Model reduction of homogeneous-in-the-state bilinear systems with input constraints. Automatica, 47, 761–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutscher, J. (2005). Nonlinear model simplification using L2-optimal bilinearization. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, 11, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando, K.V., & Nicholson, H. (1984a). On a fundamental property of the cross-Gramian matrix. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, CAS-31(5), 504–505.
   Google Scholar
• Fernando, K.V., & Nicholson, H. (1984b). On the structure of balanced and other principal representations of linear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-28, 228–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flagg, G., & Gugercin, S. Multipoint Volterra series interpolation and H2 optimal model reduction of bilinear systems. Available as arXiv:1312.2627. (Submitted for publication).
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon, E., Desbiens, A., & Pomerleau, A. (1999). Selection of pairing and constrained robust decentralized PI controllers. In Proceedings of American Control Conference (pp. 4343–4347). San Diego, CA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, A. (2002). Kronecker products and matrix calculus: With applications. Ellis Horwood series in mathematics and its applications. Chichester: Horwood.
   Google Scholar
• Halvarsson, B. (2008). Comparison of some gramian based interaction measures. In Proceedings of IEEE Multi-Conference on Systems and Control (pp. 138–143). San Antonio, TX: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, C., Schafer-Bung, B., & Zueva, A. (2013). Balanced averaging of bilinear systems with applications to stochastic control. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 51, 2356–2378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ionescu, T.C., Fujimoto, K., & Scherpen, J.M.A. (2011). Singular value analysis of nonlinear symmetric systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 56, 2073–2086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ionescu, T.C., & Scherpen, J.M.A. (2008). Nonlinear cross Gramians. In A. Korytowski, K. Malanowski, W. Mitkowski, & M. Szymkat (Eds.), System modeling and optimization, IFIP advances in information and communication technology (Vol. 312, pp. 293–306). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Khaki-Sedigh, A., & Moaveni, B. (2009). Control configuration selection for multivariable plants. Lecture notes in control and information sciences. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E.G., & Marcus, L. (1967). Foundations of optimal control theory. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, Qian-Fang, Cai, Wen-Jian, Li, Shao-Yuan, & Wang, You-Yi. (2012). Interaction analysis and loop pairing for MIMO processes described by T-S fuzzy models. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 207, 64–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moaveni, B., & Khaki-Sedigh, A. (2008). Input-output pairing analysis for uncertain multivariable processes. Journal of Process Control, 18, 527–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohler, R.R. (1991). Nonlinear systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, B.C. (1981). Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-26, 17–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederlinski, A. (1971). A heuristic approach to the design of linear multivariable interacting control systems. Automatica, 7, 691–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado, M.E., & Conley, A. (2004). MIMO interaction measure and controller structure selection. International Journal of Control, 77, 367–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scattolini, R. (2009). Architectures for distributed and hierarchical model predictive control – a review. Journal of Process Control, 19, 723–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaker, H.R., & Komareji, M. (2012). Control configuration selection for multivariable nonlinear systems. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 51, 8583–8587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaker, H.R., & Stoustrup, J. (2012). Control configuration selection for multivariable descriptor systems. In Proceedings of the 2012 American Control Conference (pp. 6294–6299). Montreal, QC: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Shaker, H.R., & Stoustrup, J. (2013). An interaction measure for control configuration selection for multivariable bilinear systems. Nonlinear Dynamics, 72, 165–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaker, H.R., & Tahavori, M. (2013). Frequency-interval control configuration selection for multivariable bilinear systems. Journal of Process Control, 23, 894–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogestad, S., & Morari, M. (1987). Implications of large RGA elements on control performance. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 26, 2323–2330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, D.C., & Antoulas, A.C. (2002). The Sylvester equation and approximate balanced truncation. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 351–352, 671–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streif, S., Findeisen, R., & Bullinger, E. (2006). Relating cross Gramians and sensitivity analysis in systems biology. In Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems (pp. 24–28). Kyoto, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Svoronos, S., Stephanopoulos, G., & Aris, A. (1980). Bilinear approximation of general non-linear dynamic systems with linear inputs. International Journal of Control, 31, 109–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witcher, M.F., & McAvoy, T.J. (1977). Interacting control systems: Steady-state and dynamic measurement of interaction. ISA Transactions, 16, 35–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenmark, B., & Salgado, M.E. (2002). Hankel-norm based interaction measure for input-output pairing. Proceedings of the 2002 IFAC World Congress, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., & Lam, J. (2002). On H2 model reduction of bilinear systems. Automatica, 38, 205–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Lam, J., Huang, B., & Yang, G.H. (2003). On gramians and balanced truncation of discrete-time bilinear systems. International Journal of Control, 76, 414–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar