Identification and control of electro-mechanical systems using state-dependent parameter estimation

References

• Beven, K.J., Leedal, D.T., Smith, P.J., & Young, P.C. (2012). Identification and representation of state dependent nonlinearities in flood forecasting using the DBM methodology. In Liuping Wang and Hugues Garnier, (Eds.). System identification, environmetric modelling and control (pp. 341–366). London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Brunot, M., Janot, A., Carrillo, F., Garnier, H., Vandanjon, P.O., & Gautier, M. (2015). Physical parameter identification of a one-degree-of-freedom electromechanical system operating in closed loop. In Yanlong Zhao, Editor. Proceedings of the 17th IFAC Symposium on System Identification (SYSID 2015), vol. 48, (pp. 823–828). Beijing, China: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Calanca, A., Capisani, L.M., Ferrara, A., & Magnani, L. (2011). MIMO closed loop identification of an industrial robot. IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology, 19, 1214–1224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautier, M., & Briot, S. (2014). Global identification of joint drive gains and dynamic parameters of robots. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 136, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautier, M., Janot, A., & Vandanjon, P.O. (2013). A new closed-loop output error method for parameter identification of robot dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology, 21, 428–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautier, M., & Khalil, W. (1992). Exciting trajectories for the identification of the inertial parameters of robots. International Journal of Robotics Research, 11, 362–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautier, M., & Poignet, P. (2001). Extended Kalman filtering and weighted least-squares dynamic identification of robot. Control Engineering Practice, 9, 1361–1372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollerbach, J., Khalil, W., & Gautier, M. (2008). Springer handbook of robotics. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Indri, M., Calafiore, G., Legnani, G., Jatta, F., & Visioli, A. (2002). Optimized dynamic calibration of a SCARA robot. In Proceedings of the 15th IFAC World Congress (IFAC WC 2002) pp. 431–436. Barcelona, Spain: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Isidori, A. (1995). Nonlinear control systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Janot, A., Vandanjon, P.O., & Gautier, M. (2014a). A generic instrumental variable approach for industrial robots identification. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 22, 132–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janot, A., Vandanjon, P.O., & Gautier, M. (2014b). An instrumental variable approach for rigid industrial robots identification. Control Engineering Practice, 25, 85–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil, W., & Dombre, E. (2002). Modeling, identification and control of robots. London: Hermes Penton.
   Google Scholar
• Kostic, D., de Jager, B., Steinbuch, M., & Hensen, R. (2004). Modeling and identification for high-performance robot control: An RRR-robotic arm case study. IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology, 12, 904–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leith, D.J., & Leithead, W.E. (1998). Gain-scheduled and nonlinear systems: Dynamic analysis by velocity-based linearization families. International Journal of Control, 70, 289–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noel, J.-P., Schoukens, J., & Kerschen, G. (2015). Grey-box nonlinear state-space modelling for mechanical vibrations identification. In Yanlong Zhao, Editor. Proceedings of the 17th IFAC Symposium on System Identification (SYSID 2015), vol. 48, (pp. 817–822). Beijing, China: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, M.M., Swevers, J., & Verdonck, W. (2002). Maximum likelihood identification of a dynamic robot model: Implementation issues. International Journal of Robotics Research, 21, 89–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östring, M., Gunnarsson, S., & Norrlöf, M. (2003). Closed-loop identification of an industrial robot containing flexibilities. Control Engineering Practice, 11, 291–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Previdi, F., & Lovera, M. (2003). Identification of a class of nonlinear parametrically varying models. International Journal on Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, 17, 33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Previdi, F., & Lovera, M. (2004).Identification of non-linear parametrically varying models using separable least squares. International Journal of Control, 77, 1382–1392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramdani, N., & Poignet, P. (2005). Robust dynamic experimental identification of robots with set membership uncertainty. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 10, 253–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, J., Tych, W., Chotai, A., & Young, P.C. (2010). Multi-state dependent parameter model identification and estimation for nonlinear dynamic systems. Electronics Letters, 46, 1265–1266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swevers, J., Verdonck, W., & De Schutter, J. (2007). Dynamic model identification for industrial robots – integrated experiment design and parameter estimation. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 27, 58–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C.J., Chotai, A., & Young, P.C. (2008). Non-linear control by input–output state variable feedback pole assignment. International Journal of Control, 82, 1029–1044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C.J., Young, P.C., & Chotai, A. (2013). True digital control. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Hof, P.M.J. (1998). Closed loop issues in system identification. Annual Reviews in Control, 22, 173–186.
   Google Scholar
• Wernholt, E., & Gunnarsson, S. (2008). Estimation of nonlinear effects in frequency domain identification of industrial robots. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 57, 856–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, A.P., Zhu, G., & Choi, J. (2013). Linear parameter-varying control for engineering applications. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Xi, F. (1995). Effect of non-geometric errors on manipulator inertial calibration. In Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 1995), pp. 1808–1813. Nagoya, Japan: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P.C. (1996). A general approach to identification, estimation and control for a class of nonlinear dynamic systems. In M.I. Friswell J.E. Mottershead (Eds.), Identification in engineering systems, (pp. 436–445). Swansea: University of Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P.C. (1981). A second generation adaptive autostabilization system for airborne vehicles. Automatica, 17, 459–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, P.C. (1998a). Data-based mechanistic modeling of engineering systems. Journal of Vibration and Control, 4, 5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, P.C. (1998b). Data-based mechanistic modeling of environmental, ecological, economic and engineering systems. Environmental Modelling & Software, 13, 105–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, P.C. (1999). Nonstationary time series analysis and forecasting. Progress in Environmental Science, 1, 3–48.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P.C. (2000). Stochastic, dynamic modelling and signal processing: Time variable and state dependent parameter estimation. In W.J. Fitzgerald A. Walden R. Smith P.C. Young (Eds.), Nonlinear and nonstationary signal processing (pp. 74–114). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P.C. (2001). The identification and estimation of nonlinear stochastic systems. In A.I. Mees ( Ed.), Nonlinear dynamics and statistics (pp. 127–166). Boston, MA: Birkhauser.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P.C. (2005). Comments on identification of non-linear parametrically varying models using separable least squares’ by F. Previdi and M. Lovera: Black-box or open box? International Journal of Control, 78, 122–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, P.C. (2011). Recursive estimation and time-series analysis: An introduction for the student and practitioner. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P.C. (2015). SDP control of second order electro-mechanical positioning systems (Technical Report No. TN/PCY/2). UK: Systems and Control Group, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P.C., Foster, M., & Lees, M.J. (1993). A direct approach to the identification and estimation of continuous-time systems from discrete-time data based on fixed interval smoothing. In Proceedings 12th IFAC World Congress (IFAC WC 1993). Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P.C., McKenna, P., & Bruun, J. (2001). Identification of nonlinear stochastic systems by state dependent parameter estimation. International Journal of Control, 74, 1837–1857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar