Flat trajectory design and tracking with saturation guarantees: a nano-drone application

References

• Aguilar-Ibáñez, C., Sira-Ramírez, H., Suárez-Castañón, M. S., Martínez-Navarro, E., & Moreno-Armendariz, M. A. (2012). The trajectory tracking problem for an unmanned four-rotor system: Flatness-based approach. International Journal of Control, 85(1), 69–77. doi: 10.1080/00207179.2011.638328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, N., & Lynch, A. F. (2016). Inner–outer loop control for quadrotor uavs with input and state constraints. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 24(5), 1797–1804. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2015.2505642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowling, I. D., Yakimenko, O. A., Whidborne, J. F., & Cooke, A. K. (2007, July). A prototype of an autonomous controller for a quadrotor UAV. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE European Control Conference (ECC 2007), Kos, Greece. pp. 4001–4008.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, J. J. (2005). Introduction to robotics: Mechanics and control (Vol. 3). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Do, K. D. (2015). Coordination control of quadrotor vtol aircraft in three-dimensional space. International Journal of Control, 88(3), 543–558. doi: 10.1080/00207179.2014.966324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelhardt, T., Konrad, T., Schäfer, B., & Abel, D. (2016, June). Flatness-based control for a quadrotor camera helicopter using model predictive control trajectory generation. Proceedings of the 24th IEEE Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED 2016), Athens, Greece. pp. 852–859.
   Google Scholar
• Formentin, S., & Lovera, M. (2011, December). Flatness-based control of a quadrotor helicopter via feedforward linearization. Proceedings of the 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC 2011), Orlando, FL, USA. pp. 6171–6176.
   Google Scholar
• Giernacki, W., Skwierczyński, M., Witwicki, W., Wroński, P., & Kozierski, P. (2017, August). Crazyflie 2.0 quadrotor as a platform for research and education in robotics and control engineering. Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR 2017), Miedzyzdroje, Poland. pp. 37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hassanalian, M., & Abdelkefi, A. (2017). Classifications, applications, and design challenges of drones: A review. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 91, 99–131. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inaba, M., & Corke, P. (2016). Robotics research: The 16th International Symposium ISRR (Vol. 114). Basel, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kerma, M., Mokhtari, A., Abdelaziz, B., & Orlov, Y. (2012). Nonlinear H∞ control of a quadrotor (UAV), using high order sliding mode disturbance estimator. International Journal of Control, 85(12), 1876–1885. doi: 10.1080/00207179.2012.709656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, B., Deits, R., Florence, P. R., & Tedrake, R. (2016, May). Aggressive quadrotor flight through cluttered environments using mixed integer programming. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2016), Stockholm, Sweden. pp. 1469–1475.
   Google Scholar
• Lévine, J. (2011). On necessary and sufficient conditions for differential flatness. Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing, 22(1), 47–90. doi: 10.1007/s00200-010-0137-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W., Chitour, Y., & Sontag, E. (1996). On finite-gain stabilizability of linear systems subject to input saturation. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 34(4), 1190–1219. doi: 10.1137/S0363012994263469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfberg, J. (2004). Yalmip: A toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB. In Proceedings of the CACSD conference, Taipei, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, H., Liu, C., Guo, L., & Chen, W.-H. (2017). Constrained anti-disturbance control for a quadrotor based on differential flatness. International Journal of Systems Science, 48(6), 1182–1193. doi: 10.1080/00207721.2016.1244307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luis, C., & Ny, J. L. (2016, August). Design of a trajectory tracking controller for a nanoquadcopter (Technical Report). Mobile Robotics and Autonomous System Laboratory, Polytechnique Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Maggiore, M. (2015). Reduction principles for hierarchical control design.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, M. W., & D'Andrea, R. (2013, July). A model predictive controller for quadrocopter state interception. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE European Control Conference (ECC 2013), Zurich, Switzerland. pp. 1383–1389.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N. T., Prodan, I., & Lefèvre, L. (2017, July). Multi-layer optimization-based control design for quadcopter trajectory tracking. Proceedings of the 25th IEEE Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED 2017), Valetta, Malta. pp. 601–606.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N. T., Prodan, I., & Lefèvre, L. (2018, July). Effective angular constrained trajectory generation for thrust-propelled vehicles. Proceedings of the 16th European Control Conference (ECC 2018), Limassol, Cyprus. pp. 1833–1838.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N. T., Prodan, I., Stoican, F., & Lefèvre, L. (2017). Reliable nonlinear control for quadcopter trajectory tracking through differential flatness. Proceedings of the 20th IFAC World Congress, July, 2017, Toulouse, France. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50(1), 6971–6976.
   Google Scholar
• Piegl, L., & Tiller, W. (1995). B-spline curves and surfaces. In The NURBS book (pp. 81–116). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Prodan, I., Olaru, S., Bencatel, R., de Sousa, J., Stoica, C., & Niculescu, S.-I. (2013). Receding horizon flight control for trajectory tracking of autonomous aerial vehicles. Control Engineering Practice, 21(10), 1334–1349. doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2013.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, X.-N., Zhang, Y.-A., & Zhou, D. (2015). A geometric approach for quadrotor trajectory tracking control. International Journal of Control, 88(11), 2217–2227. doi: 10.1080/00207179.2015.1039593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoican, F., Prodan, I., & Popescu, D. (2015, June). Flat trajectory generation for way-points relaxations and obstacle avoidance. Proceedings of the 23th IEEE Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED 2015), Torremolinos, Spain. pp. 695–700.
   Google Scholar
• Stoican, F., Prodan, I., Popescu, D., & Ichim, L. (2017, July). Constrained trajectory generation for UAV systems using a B-spline parametrization. Proceedings of the 25th IEEE Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED 2017), Valette, Malta. pp. 613–618.
   Google Scholar
• Suryawan, F. (2012). Constrained trajectory generation and fault tolerant control based on differential flatness and B-splines (PhD thesis). School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Newcastle, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Teel, A. R. (1992). Global stabilization and restricted tracking for multiple integrators with bounded controls. Systems & Control Letters, 18(3), 165–171. doi: 10.1016/0167-6911(92)90001-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F., & Lu, B. (2004). Anti-windup control design for exponentially unstable LTI systems with actuator saturation. Systems & Control Letters, 52(3), 305–322. doi: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2004.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, W., & Go, T. H. (2014). Quadcopter formation flight control combining MPC and robust feedback linearization. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 351(3), 1335–1355. doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2013.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar