A new approach to design set-membership state estimators for discrete-time linear systems based on the observability matrix

References

• Alamo, T., Bravo, J. M., & Camacho, E. F. (2005). Guaranteed state estimation by zonotopes. Automatica, 41, 1035–1043. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2004.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacace, F., Germani, A., & Manes, C. (2015). A new approach to design interval observers for linear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 60, 1665–1670. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2014.2359714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambon, E., Burlion, L., & Apkarian, P. (2016). Overview of linear time-invariant interval observer design: Towards a non-smooth optimisation-based approach. IET Control Theory & Applications, 10, 1258–1268. doi: 10.1049/iet-cta.2015.0742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisci, L., Garulli, A., & Zappa, G. (1996). Recursive state bounding by parallelotopes. Automatica, 32, 1049–1055. doi: 10.1016/0005-1098(96)00048-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combastel, C. (2003). A state bounding observer based on zonotopes. In Proceedings of European control conference (pp. 2589–2594). Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Durieu, C., Walter, E., & Polyak, B. (2001). Multi-input multi-output ellipsoidal state bounding. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 111(2), 273–303. doi: 10.1023/A:1011978200643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efimov, D., Perruquetti, W., Raïssi, T., & Zolghadri, A. (2013). On interval observer design for time invariant discrete time systems. In Proceedings of the European control conference (pp. 266–269). Zurich, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Efimov, D., Perruquetti, W., Raïssi, T., & Zolghadri, A. (2016). Design of interval observers for estimation and stabilization of discrete-time LPV systems. IMA Journal of Mathematical Control and Information, 33(4), 1051–1066. doi: 10.1093/imamci/dnv023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efimov, D., & Raïssi, T. (2016). Design of interval observers for uncertain dynamical systems. Automation and Remote Control, 77(2), 191–225. doi: 10.1134/S0005117916020016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaulin, L., Kieffer, M., Didrit, O., & Walter, E (2001). Applied interval analysis: With examples in parameter and state estimation, robust control and robotics. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kalman, R. E. (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Basic Engineering, 82(Series D), 35–45. doi: 10.1115/1.3662552
   Google Scholar
• Kieffer, M., & Walter, E. (2004). Guaranteed nonlinear state estimator for cooperative systems. Numerical Algorithms, 37(1), 187–198. doi: 10.1023/B:NUMA.0000049466.96588.a6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühn, W. (1998). Rigorously computed orbits of dynamical systems without the wrapping effect. Computing, 61(1), 47–67. doi: 10.1007/BF02684450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurzhanski, A. B., & Vályi, I (1996). Ellipsoidal calculus for estimation and control. Boston: Birkhaüser.
   Google Scholar
• Le, V. T. H., Stoica, C., Alamo, T., Camacho, E. F., & Dumur, D. (2013). Zonotopic guaranteed state estimation for uncertain systems. Automatica, 49(1), 3418–3424. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2013.08.014
   Google Scholar
• Loukkas, N., Martinez, J., & Meslem, N. (2017). Set-membership observer design based on ellipsoidal invariant sets. In Proceedings of the IFAC 2017 world congress (pp. 6471–6476). Toulouse, France.
   Google Scholar
• Mazenc, F., & Dinh, T. N. (2013). Continuous-discrete interval observers for systems with discrete measurements. In Proceedings of the IEEE 52nd annual conference on decision and control (CDC) (pp. 787–792). Firenze, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Mazenc, F., Dinh, T. N., & Niculescu, S. I. (2013). Robust interval observers for discrete time systems of luenberger type. In Proceedings of the American control conference (pp. 2484–2489). Washington, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Mazenc, F., Dinh, T. N., & Niculescu, S. I. (2014). Interval observers for discrete-time systems. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 24, 2867–2890. doi: 10.1002/rnc.3030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meslem, N., & Prieur, C. (2014). State estimation based on self-triggered measurements. In Proceedings of the 19th IFAC world congress (pp. 86–91). Cape Town, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Meslem, N., & Ramdani, N. (2011). Interval observer design based on nonlinear hybridization and practical stability analysis. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, 25(3), 228–248. doi: 10.1002/acs.1208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meslem, N., & Ramdani, N. (2018a). A comparison of two methods for state estimation: A statistical Kalman filter, and a deterministic interval-based approach. In Proceedings of the 26th mediterranean conference on control and automation (MED 2018) (pp. 1–6). Zadar, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Meslem, N., & Ramdani, N. (2018b). Forward-backward set-membership state estimator based on interval analysis. In Proceedings of the American control conference. Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. E (1966). Interval analysis. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Raïssi, T., Efimov, D., & Zolghadri, A. (2012). Interval state estimation for a class of nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 57(1), 260–265. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2011.2164820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweppe, F. C. (1968). Recursive state estimation: Unknown but bounded errors and system inputs. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 13(1), 22–28. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1968.1098790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson, H. (1983). Special issue on applications of Kalman filtering. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 28(3), 253–434. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1983.1103221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar