Interval and linear matrix inequality techniques for reliable control of linear continuous-time cooperative systems with applications to heat transfer

References

• Baumann, W. (1988). Feedback control of multiinput nonlinear systems by extended linearization. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 33(2), 193–197. doi: 10.1109/9.389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann, W., & Rugh, W. (1986). Feedback control of nonlinear systems by extended linearization. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 31(1), 40–46. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1986.1104100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, S., El Ghaoui, L., Feron, E., & Balakrishnan, V. (1994). Linear matrix inequalities in system and control theory. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.
   Google Scholar
• Cobelli, C., Finkelstein, L., & Carsen, E. R. (1982). Mathematical modelling of endocrine and metabolic systems: Model formulation, identification and validation. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 24(6), 442–451. doi: 10.1016/0378-4754(82)90641-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copp, J. (Ed.). (2001). The COST simulation benchmark – description and simulator manual. Brussels, Belgium: COST (European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research).
   Google Scholar
• Dinh, T. N., Marouani, G., Raïssi, T., Wang, Z., & Messaoud, H. (2019). Optimal interval observers for discrete-time linear switched systems. International Journal of Control, 1–9. doi:10.1080/00207179.2019.1575518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efimov, D., Raïssi, T., Chebotarev, S., & Zolghadri, A. (2013). Interval state observer for nonlinear time varying systems. Automatica, 49(1), 200–205. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2012.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortmann, T., & Hitz, K. (1977). An introduction to linear control systems. New York,NY: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Gennat, M., & Tibken, B. (2007). Guaranteed bounds for uncertain systems: Methods using linear lyapunov-like functions, differential inequalities and a midpoint method. CD-Proceedings of the 12th GAMM-IMACS international symposium on Scientific Computing, Computer Arithmetic, and Validated Numerics SCAN 2006, Duisburg, Germany. IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, E. P., Tibken, B., & Fliedner, T. M. (1991). Modern control theory as a tool to describe the biomathematical model of granulocytopoiesis. In D. P. F. Möller & O. Richter (Eds.), Analyse dynamischer Systeme in Medizin, Biologie, Ökologie (pp. 33–39). Berlin: Springer–Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ichalal, D., Marx, B., Maquin, D., & Ragot, J. (2018). State estimation of system with bounded uncertain parameters: Interval multimodel approach. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, 32, 480–493. doi: 10.1002/acs.2855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ifqir, S., Rauh, A., Kersten, J., Ichalal, D., Ait-Oufroukh, N., & Mammar, S. (2019). Interval observer-based controller design for systems with state constraints: Application to solid oxide fuel cells stacks. IEEE international conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics MMAR 2019, Miedzyzdroje, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Jaulin, L., Kieffer, M., Didrit, O., & Walter, É. (2001). Applied interval analysis. London: Springer–Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kaczorek, T. (2002). Positive 1D and 2D systems. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kersten, J., Rauh, A., & Aschemann, H. (2018). State-space transformations of uncertain systems with purely real and conjugate-complex eigenvalues into a cooperative form. IEEE international conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics MMAR 2018, Miedzyzdroje, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Kharkovskaia, T., Efimov, D., Fridman, E., Polyakov, A., & Richard, J. P. (2017). On design of interval observers for parabolic PDEs. Proceedings of the 20th IFAC World Congress, Toulouse, France.
   Google Scholar
• Kharkovskaya, T., Efimov, D., Polyakov, A., & Richard, J. P. (2016). Interval observers for PDEs: Approximation approach. Proceedings of the 10th IFAC symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems (NOLCOS), Monterey, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kharkovskaya, T., Efimov, D., Polyakov, A., & Richard, J. P. (2018). Design of interval observers and controls for PDEs using finite-element approximations. Automatica, 93, 302–310. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2018.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühn, W. (1999). Rigorous error bounds for the initial value problem based on defect estimation (Technical Report). Retrieved from http://www.decatur.de/personal/papers/defect.zip
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., & Stadtherr, M. A. (2006). Validated solution of initial value problems for ODEs with interval parameters. NSF workshop proceeding on Reliable Engineering Computing, Savannah, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Löfberg, J. (2004). YALMIP: A toolbox for modeling and optmization in MATLAB. Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on Computer Aided Control Systems Design, Taipei, Taiwan (pp. 284–289).
   Google Scholar
• Lohner, R. (1987). Enclosing the solutions of ordinary initial and boundary value problems. In E. W. Kaucher, U. W. Kulisch, & C. Ullrich (Eds.), Computer arithmetic: Scientific computation and programming languages (pp. 255–286). Stuttgart: Wiley-Teubner Series in Computer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Lohner, R. (2001). On the ubiquity of the wrapping effect in the computation of the error bounds. In U. Kulisch, R. Lohner, & A. Facius (Eds.), Perspectives on enclosure methods (pp. 201–217). Wien, NY: Springer–Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mazenc, F., Andrieu, V., & Malisoff, M. (2015). Design of continuous-discrete observers for time-varying nonlinear systems. Automatica, 57(Suppl. C), 135–144. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2015.04.016
   Google Scholar
• Mazenc, F., & Bernard, O. (2010, February). Asymptotically stable interval observers for planar systems with complex poles. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 55(2), 523–527. doi:10.1109/TAC.2009.2037472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M. (1927). Über die Eindeutigkeit der Integrale eines Systems gewöhnlicher Differenzialgleichungen und die Konvergenz einer Gattung von Verfahren zur Approximation dieser Integrale. Sitzungsbericht Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Nedialkov, N. S. (2007). Interval tools for ODEs and DAEs. CD-Proceedings of the 12th GAMM-IMACS conference symposium on Scientific Computing, Computer Arithmetic, and Validated Numerics SCAN 2006, Duisburg, Germany. IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Raïssi, T., & Efimov, D. (2018). Some recent results on the design and implementation of interval observers for uncertain systems. at - Automatisierungstechnik, 66(3), 213–224. doi: 10.1515/auto-2017-0081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raïssi, T., Efimov, D., & Zolghadri, A. (2012). Interval state estimation for a class of nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 57, 260–265. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2011.2164820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauh, A., Auer, E., & Hofer, E. P. (2007). ValEncIA-IVP: A comparison with other initial value problem solvers. CD-Proceedings of the 12th GAMM-IMACS international symposium on Scientific Computing, Computer Arithmetic, and Validated Numerics SCAN 2006, Duisburg, Germany. IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Rauh, A., Kersten, J., & Aschemann, H. (2018a). An interval approach for parameter identification and observer design of spatially distributed heating systems. Proceedings of the 9th Vienna international conference on Mathematical Modelling MATHMOD 2018, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Rauh, A., Kersten, J., & Aschemann, H. (2018b). An interval observer approach for the online temperature estimation in solid oxide fuel cell stacks. Proceedings of the European Control Conference ECC, Limassol, Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Rauh, A., Kersten, J., & Aschemann, H. (2018c). Linear matrix inequality techniques for the optimization of interval observers for spatially distributed heating systems. IEEE international conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics MMAR 2018, Miedzyzdroje, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Rauh, A., Minisini, J., & Aschemann, H. (2010). Incremental gain scheduling and eigenvalue tracking for robust pole assignment in extended linearization of nonlinear control systems. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics MMAR 2010, Miedzyzdroje, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, C., & Weiland, S. (2011). Linear matrix inequalities in control. In W. S. Levine (Ed.), Control system advanced methods (2nd ed., pp. 24-1–24-30). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. L. (1995). Mathematical surveys and monographs. Monotone dynamical systems: An introduction to the theory of competitive and cooperative systems (Vol. 41). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Sturm, J. F. (1999). Using SeDuMi 1.02, A MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones. Optimization Methods and Software, 11–12(1–4), 625–653. doi: 10.1080/10556789908805766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinmann, A. (1991). Uncertain models and robust control. Wien: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar