918
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Beliefs and attitudes of university faculty members on climate change in the U.S.

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Stocker, T., (Ed.) 2014, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (New York: Cambridge University Press).
  • Hein, C.J., Ten Hoeve, J.E., Gopalakrishnan, S., Livneh, B., Adams, H.D., Marino, E.K. and Susan Weiler, C., 2018, Overcoming early career barriers to interdisciplinary climate change research. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 9(5), e530. doi: 10.1002/wcc.530.
  • Incropera, F.P., 2016, Climate Change: A Wicked Problem: Complexity and Uncertainty at the Intersection of Science, Economics, Politics, and Human Behavior (New York: Cambridge University Press). doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316266274.
  • Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S. and Auld, G., 2012, Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy sciences 45(2), 123–152. doi: 10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0.
  • Peters, B.G., 2017, What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program. Policy and Society 36(3), 385–396. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2017.1361633.
  • Kate, H., James, J. and Tidmarsh, C., 2019, Using wicked problems to foster interdisciplinary practice among UK trainee teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching 45(4), 446–460. doi: 10.1080/02607476.2019.1639263.
  • Pohl, C., Truffer, B. and Hirsch Hadorn, G., 2017, Addressing wicked problems through transdisciplinary research. In: The Oxford Handbook of iInterdisciplinarity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 319–331. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.26.
  • Wohlgezogen, F., McCabe, A., Osegowitsch, T. and Mol, J., 2020, The wicked problem of climate change and interdisciplinary research: Tracking management scholarship’s contribution. Journal of Management & Organization 26(6), 1048–1072. doi: 10.1017/jmo.2020.14.
  • Overland, I. and Sovacool, B.K., 2020, The misallocation of climate research funding. Energy Research & Social Science 62, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101349.
  • Rose, D.B., Van Dooren, T., Chrulew, M., Cooke, S., Kearnes, M. and O’gorman, E., 2012, Thinking through the environment, unsettling the humanities. Environmental Humanities 1(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1215/22011919-3609940.
  • Lefsrud, L.M. and Meyer, R.E., 2012, Science or science fiction? Professionals’ discursive construction of climate change. Organization Studies 33(11), 1477–1506. doi: 10.1177/0170840612463317.
  • Clayton, S., Devine-Wright, P., Stern, P.C., Whitmarsh, L., Carrico, A., Steg, L., Swim, J. and Bonnes, M., 2015, Psychological research and global climate change. Nature climate change 5(7), 640–646. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2622.
  • Leiserowitz, A.A., Maibach, E.W., Roser-Renouf, C., Smith, N. and Dawson, E., 2013, Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. The American Behavioral Scientist 57(6), 818–837. doi: 10.1177/0002764212458272.
  • Malka, A., Krosnick, J.A. and Langer, G., 2009, The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: Trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Analysis: An International Journal 29(5), 633–647. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01220.x.
  • Brewer, P.R. and Ley, B.L., 2013, Whose science do you believe? Explaining trust in sources of scientific information about the environment. Science communication 35(1), 115–137. doi: 10.1177/1075547012441691.
  • Attari, S.Z., Krantz, D.H. and Weber, E.U., 2016, Statements about climate researchers’ carbon footprints affect their credibility and the impact of their advice. Climatic Change 138(1), 325–338. doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1713-2.
  • Ziegler, A., 2017, Political orientation, environmental values, and climate change beliefs and attitudes: An empirical cross-country analysis. Energy Economics 63, 144–153. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.022.
  • Fielding, K.S. and Hornsey, M.J., 2016, A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Insights and opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121.
  • Arbuckle, J.G., Prokopy, L.S., Haigh, T., Hobbs, J., Knoot, T., Knutson, C., Loy, A., Mase, A.S., McGuire, J., Morton, L.W. and Tyndall, J., 2013, Climate change beliefs, concerns, and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation among farmers in the Midwestern United States. Climatic Change 117(4), 943–950. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0707-6.
  • Corner, A., Whitmarsh, L. and Xenias, D., 2012, Uncertainty, skepticism and attitudes towards climate change: Biased assimilation and attitude polarization. Climatic Change 114(3), 463–478. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0424-6.
  • Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T., 2018, Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches (New York: Routledge). doi: 10.4324/9780429502156.
  • Tasquier, G. and Pongiglione, F., 2017, The influence of causal knowledge on the willingness to change attitude towards climate change: Results from an empirical study. International Journal of Science Education 39(13), 1846–1868. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1355078.
  • Palm, R., Lewis, G.B. and Feng, B., 2017, What causes people to change their opinion about climate change?. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107(4), 883–896. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2016.1270193.
  • Lorenzoni, I. and Pidgeon, N.F., 2006, Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change 77(1), 73–95. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9072-z.
  • Ballew, M.T., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., Rosenthal, S.A., Kotcher, J.E., Marlon, J.R., Lyon, E., Goldberg, M.H. and Maibach, E.W., 2019, Climate change in the American mind: Data, tools, and trends. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 61(3), 4–18. doi: 10.1080/00139157.2019.1589300.
  • Whitmarsh, L., 2008, Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. Journal of Risk Research 11(3), 351–374. doi: 10.1080/13669870701552235.
  • Akerlof, K., Maibach, E.W., Fitzgerald, D., Cedeno, A.Y. and Neuman, A., 2013, Do people “personally experience” global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? Global Environmental Change 23(1), 81–91. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.006.
  • Donner, S.D. and McDaniels, J., 2013, The influence of national temperature fluctuations on opinions about climate change in the US since 1990. Climatic Change 118(3), 537–550. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0690-3.
  • Myers, T.A., Maibach, E.W., Roser-Renouf, C., Akerlof, K. and Leiserowitz, A.A., 2013, The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nature climate change 3(4), 343–347. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1754.
  • Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Butler, C. and Pidgeon, N.F., 2011, Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Climate Change 1(1), 46–49. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1059.
  • Schuldt, J.P., Rickard, L.N. and Yang, Z.J., 2018, Does reduced psychological distance increase climate engagement? On the limits of localizing climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology 55, 147–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.02.001.
  • Trope, Y. and Liberman, N., 2003, Temporal construal. Psychological Review 110(3), 403. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403.
  • Baltatescu, S., 2014, Psychological distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47(3), 610–615. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2306.
  • Steentjes, K., Pidgeon, N.F., Poortinga, W., Corner, A.J., Arnold, A., Böhm, G., Mays, C., Poumadère, M., Ruddat, M., Scheer, D. and Sonnberger, M., 2017, European Perceptions of Climate Change (EPCC): Topline Findings of a Survey Conducted in Four European Countries in 2016 (Cardiff: Cardiff University).
  • Milfont, T.L., 2010, Global warming, climate change and human psychology. In: V. Corral-Verdugo, C.H. García-Cadena and M. Frías-Arment (Ed.) Psychological Approaches to Sustainability: Current Trends in Theory, Research and Practice (New York: Nova Science), pp. 19–42.
  • Markowitz, E.M. and Shariff, A.F., 2012, Climate change and moral judgement. Nature climate change 2(4), 243–247. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1378.
  • Van Der Velden, H. and Schildmeijer, D., 2015, Public acceptance of natural gas projects: The golden age of gas? Not in My Backyard! International Gas Union World Gas Conference Papers, pp. 1048–1120. Available online at: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84963516495&partnerID=40&md5=40f63ce664c6c47a49ec51250e525ad6 (Accessed 12 January 2023).
  • Lahsen, M., 2013, Anatomy of dissent: A cultural analysis of climate skepticism. The American Behavioral Scientist 57(6), 732–753. doi: 10.1177/0002764212469799.
  • Bevan, M.T., 2014, A method of phenomenological interviewing. Qualitative Health Research 24(1), 136–144. doi: 10.1177/1049732313519710.
  • Giorgi, A., 1997, The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 28(2), 235–260. doi: 10.1163/156916297X00103.
  • Ihde, D., 1971, Hermeneutic Phenomenology: The Philosopher of Paul Ricoeur (Evanston: Northwestern University Press).
  • Larkin, M. and Thompson, A., 2012, Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Thompson, D. Harper (Ed.) Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy: A Guide for Students and Practitioners (Oxford: John Wiley & Sons), pp. 99–116. doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/9781119973249.
  • Clarke, V., Braun, V. and Hayfield, N., 2015, Thematic analysis. Qualitative psychology:. A Practical Guide to Research Methods 222(2015), 248. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613.
  • Tracy, S.J., 2019, Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell).
  • Bowen, G.A., 2008, Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research 8(1), 137–152. doi: 10.1177/1468794107085301.
  • Van der Linden, S.L., Leiserowitz, A.A., Feinberg, G.D. and Maibach, E.W., 2015, The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. Plos One 10(2), e0118489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118489.
  • Higde, E., Oztekin, C. and Sahin, E., 2017, Turkish pre-service science teachers’ awareness, beliefs, values, and behaviours pertinent to climate change. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 26(3), 253–263. doi: 10.1080/10382046.2017.1330040.
  • Ricart, S., Olcina, J. and Rico, A.M., 2018, Evaluating public attitudes and farmers’ beliefs towards climate change adaptation: Awareness, perception, and populism at European level. Land 8(1), 4. doi: 10.3390/land8010004.
  • Aklin, M. and Urpelainen, J., 2014, Perceptions of scientific dissent undermine public support for environmental policy. Environmental Science & Policy 38, 173–177. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.10.006.
  • Lahsen, M., 2008, Experiences of modernity in the greenhouse: A cultural analysis of a physicist “trio” supporting the backlash against global warming. Global Environmental Change 18(1), 204–219. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.10.001.
  • Hulme, M., 2009, Why we Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity (New York: Cambridge University Press). doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511841200.
  • Proctor, J.D., 2020, Introduction: The value of environmental disagreement. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 10(2), 156–159. doi: 10.1007/s13412-020-00591-z.