REFERENCES
- Billow, R. M. (2005). The two faces of the group therapist. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 55, 167–187.
- Billow, R. M. (2010). Resistance, rebellion and refusal in groups: The 3 Rs. London, UK: Karnac.
- Billow, R. M. (2013). Appreciating “Le Non/Nom.” Group Analysis, 46, 33–47.
- Billow, R.M. (2016). Developing nuclear ideas: Relational group psychotherapy. London, UK: Karnac.
- Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups. London, UK: Tavistock.
- Bion, W. R. (1970). Attention and interpretation. London, UK: Tavistock. [Reprinted in Seven servants: Four works by Wilfred R. Bion. New York, NY: Aronson, 1977.]
- Boesky, D. (2000). Affect, language, and communication. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81, 257–262.
- Bromberg, P. (2009). Multiple self states, the relational mind, and dissociation: A psychoanalytic perspective. In P. F. Dell & J. A. O’Neill (Eds.), Dissociation and the dissociative disorders: DSM and beyond (pp. 637–652). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Davies, J. (1999). Dissociation, therapeutic enactment and transference-countertransference process. Gender and Psychoanalysis, 2, 241–259.
- Freud, S. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practicing psycho-analysis. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 12, pp. 109–120). London, UK: Hogarth.
- Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and analysis of the ego. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 18, pp. 67–143). London, UK: Hogarth.
- Habermas, J. (1987) [1981]. Theory of communicative action, volume two: Liveworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. ( Translated by T. A. McCarthy). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
- Harper, E., & Rowan, A. (1999). Group subversion as subjective necessity—Towards a Lacanian orientation to psychoanalysis in group settings. In C. Oakley (Ed.), What is a group? A New look at theory in practice (pp. 168–203). London, UK: Rebus.
- Hopper, E. (2001). Difficult patients in group analysis: The personification of (ba) I:A/M. Group, 25, 139–171.
- Hopper, E. (2003). The social unconscious: Selected papers. London, UK, and Philadelphia, PA: Kingsley.
- Jacobs, T. (2001). On misreading and misleading patients. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 82, 653–669.
- Klein, M. (1952). Some theoretical conclusions regarding the emotional life of the infant. In Envy and gratitude (pp. 61–93). New York, NY: Delacorte Press.
- Lacan, J. (1977/1953). The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis. In Ecrits (A. Sheridan, trans., pp. 179–225). New York, NY: Norton.
- Lipin, T. (1992). Dr. Otto Isakower’s analyzing instrument: Reflections three decades later. Journal of Clinical Psychoanalysis, 1, 227–228.
- Menzies Lyth, I. (1988). A psychoanalytic perspective on social institutions. In E. Spillius (Ed.), Melanie Klein today (vol. 2, pp. 284–299). London, UK: Routledge.
- Mitchell, S. (1993). Hope and dread in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Ogden, T. (2003). On not being able to dream. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 84, 17–30.
- Racker, H. (1968). Transference and countertransference. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
- Renik, O. (1996). The analyst’s self-discovery. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 16, 390–400.
- Schwartz, H. (2012). Intersubjectivity and dialecticism. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 93, 401–425.
- Stolorow, R. D. (1997). Principles of dynamic systems, intersubjectivity, and the obsolete distinction between one-person and two-person psychologies. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 7, 859–868.
- Stolorow, R. D. (2013). Intersubjective-systems theory: A phenomenological-contextualist psychoanalytic perspective. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 23, 383–389.
- Sweeney, J. (1990). “Pat.” Created and performed by Julia Sweeney: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_%28Saturday_Night_Live%29.