WISE: A Support Group for Graduate and Post-Graduate Women in STEM

References

• Andersen, M., & Collins, P. H. (Eds.). (2004). Race, class and gender: An anthology (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Barak, A., Boniel-Nissim, M., & Suler, J. (2008). Fostering empowerment in online support groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1867–1883. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkman, L. F., & Glass, T. (2000). Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. In L. F. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 158–162). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, H., Burlingame, G., Flores, P., Greene, L., Joyce, A., Kobos, J. C., … Feirman, D. (2008). Clinical practice guidelines for group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 58(4), 455–542. doi:10.1521/ijgp.2008.58.4.455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers. Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. doi:10.1080/09540250500145072
   Google Scholar
• Brainard, S. G., & Carlin, L. (1998). A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 17–27. doi:10.1002/jee.1998.87.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. V. (2000). The preparation of minorities for academic careers in science and engineering: How well are we doing? In G. Campbell, R. Denes, & C. Morrison (Eds.), Race, ethnicity, and the scientific enterprise (pp. 239–269). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, R. J., & Mattis, M. C. (2007). Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Upping the numbers. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Burlingame, G. M., Fuhriman, A., & Johnson, J. (2001). Cohesion in Group Psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Theory Research & Practice, 38(4), 373–379. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burlingame, G. M., Fuhriman, A., & Johnson, J. E. (2002). Cohesion in group psychotherapy. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients (pp. 71–88). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burlingame, G. M., Fuhriman, A., & Mosier, J. (2003). The differential effectiveness of group psychotherapy: A meta-analytic perspective. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(1), 3–12. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.7.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burlingame, G. M., McClendon, D. T., & Yang, C. (2018). Cohesion in group therapy: A meta- analysis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 384–398. doi:10.1037/pst0000173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnes, T. R., & Ross, K. L. (2010). Applying social justice to oppression and marginalization in group process: Interventions and strategies for group counselors. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 35(2), 169–176. doi:10.1080/01933921003706014
   Google Scholar
• Burrelli, J. (2009, October). Women of color in STEM education and employment. Paper presented at the Mini-Symposium on Women of Color in STEM, Arlington, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Bussey-Jones, J., Bernstein, L., Higgins, S., Malebranche, D., Paranjape, A., Genao, I., … Branch, W. (2006). Repaving the road to academic success: The IMeRGE approach to peer mentoring. Academic Medicine, 81, 674–679. doi:10.1097/01.ACM.0000232425.27041.88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, J. (2007). Effects of support groups on post traumatic stress responses in women experiencing stillbirth. Journal of Death and Dying, 55(1), 71–90. doi:10.2190/M447-1X11-6566-8042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canetto, S. S., Trott, C. D., Winterrowd, D., Haruyama, D., & Johnson, A. (2017). Challenges to the choice discourse: Women’s views of their family and academic-science career options and constraints. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 29(1–2), 4–27. doi:10.1080/08952833.2016.1273174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cech, E., Rubineau, B., Silbey, S., & Seron, C. (2011). Professional role confidence and gendered persistence in engineering. American Sociological Review, 76(5), 641–666. doi:10.1177/0003122411420815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, W. T., & Norman, I. (2009). The effectiveness and active ingredients of mutual support groups for family caregivers of people with psychotic disorders: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(12), 1604–1623. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S. L., Dyar, C., Maung, N., & London, B. (2016). Psychosocial pathways to STEM engagement among graduate students in the life sciences. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(3), 45. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-01-0036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, C., & Hill, C. (2015). Solving the equation: The variables for women’s success in engineering and computing. Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation. Retrived from https://www.aauw.org/research/solving-the-equation/
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, N., Scircle, M. M., & Hunsinger, M. (2015). Female peers in small work groups enhance women’s motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(16), 4988–4993. doi:10.1073/pnas.1422822112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delucia-Waack, J. L., Kalodner, C. R., & Riva, M. T. (2014). Handbook of group counseling and psychotherapy (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dennehy, T. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2017). Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(23), 5964–5969. doi:10.1073/pnas.1613117114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detsky, A. S. (2011). How to be a good academic leader. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26(1), 88–90. doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1486-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, T. K. (1994). The check-in and other go-rounds in group work. Social Work with Groups, 17(1–2), 163–175. doi:10.1300/J009v17n01_10
   Google Scholar
• Edmunds, L. D., Ovseiko, P. V., Shepperd, S., Greenhalgh, T., Frith, P., & Roberts, N. W. (2016). Why do women choose or reject careers in academic medicine? A narrative review of empirical evidence. The Lancet, 388(10062), 2948–2958. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01091-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., & Uzzi, B. (2000). Athena unbound: The advancement of women in science and technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R., Felder, G., Mauney, M., & Dietz, E. J. (1995). A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention III. Gender differences in student performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2), 151–163. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.1995.tb00162.x
   Google Scholar
• Fouad, N., & Singh, R. (2011). Stemming the tide: Why Women leave engineering. Milwaukee, WI: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F. (2010). Women and men faculty in academic science and engineering: Social-organizational indicators and implications. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(7), 997–1012. doi:10.1177/0002764209356234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromme, D. K., Dickey, G. V., & Schaefer, J. P. (1983). Group modification of affective verbalizations: Reinforcement and therapist style effects. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39(6). doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198311)39:6<893::AID-JCLP2270390612>3.0.CO;2-M
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (Eds.). (2008). Health behavior and health education. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233. doi:10.2307/202051
   Google Scholar
• Han, J. Y., Shaw, B. R., Hawkins, R. P., Pingree, S., McTavish, F., & Gustafson, D. H. (2008). Expressing positive emotions within online support groups by women with breast cancer. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(8), 1002–1007. doi:10.1177/1359105308097963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, B. E., Linden, W., & Najarian, B. (2002). Social support interventions: Do they work? Clinical Psychology Review, 22(3), 381–440. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(01)001012-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, B., Salvatori, P., & Martin, A. (2008). Intraprofessional fieldwork education: Occupational therapy and occupational therapist assistant students learning together. The Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(1), 42–50. doi:10.2182/cjot.06.05x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemelgor, C., & Etzkowitz, H. (2001). Overcoming isolation: Women’s dilemmas in American academic science. Minerva, 39(2), 153–174. doi:10.1023/A:1010344929577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivlighan, D. M., & Holmes, S. E. (2004). The importance of therapeutic factors: A typology of therapeutic factors studies. In J. L. DeLucia-Waack, D. A. Gerrity, C. R. Kalodner, & M. T. Riva (Eds.), Handbook of group counseling and psychotherapy (p. 23–36). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781452229683.n2
   Google Scholar
• Kleinman, S. S. (2003). Women in science and engineering building community online. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9(1), 73–88. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v9.i1
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, B., Shuhaibar, E. L., & Chen, R. (2010). Nursing student perceptions of intraprofessional team education using high-fidelity simulation. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(11), 628–631. doi:10.3928/01484834-20100730-06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liamputtong, P., Haritavorn, N., & Kiatying-Angsulee, N. (2009). HIV and AIDS, stigma and AIDS support groups: Perspectives from women living with HIV and AIDS in central Thailand. Social Science & Medicine, 69(6), 862–868. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. A., & Goldstein, B. A. (2006). Not all negative emotions are equal: The role of emotional expression in online support groups for women with breast cancer. Psych-Oncology, 15, 160–168. doi:10.1002/pon.932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litzler, E., Lange, S. E., & Brainard, S. G. (2005). Climate for graduate students in science and engineering departments. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• London, B., Rosenthal, L., Levy, S. R., & Lobel, M. (2011). The influences of perceived identity compatibility and social support on women in nontraditional fields during the college transition. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33(4), 304–321. doi:10.1080/01973533.2011.614166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R., & Mason, S. (2012). Open-ended and open-door treatment groups for young people with mental illnesses. Social Work With Groups, 35(1), 50–67. doi:10.1080/01609513.2011.587099
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2003). Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6), 659–671. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00040-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, A. L., & Baker, J. (2008). Gender, race, and the ethnic segregation of science fields in U.S. universities. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 14(2), 159–176. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v14.i2.30
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Sexual harassment of women: Climate, culture, and consequences in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/24994
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2007). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/11741
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, K. (2000). Study takes early look at social consequences of Net use. Stanford Report. Retrieved from https://news.stanford.edu/news/2000/february16/internetsurvey-216.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, M., Smith, J. M., & Ko, L. T. (2018). Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 206–245. doi:10.1002/tea.v55.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L. L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172–208. doi:10.17763/haer.81.2.t022245n7x4752v2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, V. A., & Kram, K. (1993). Women mentoring women: Creating conditions for connection. Business Horizons, 36(2), 42–51. doi:10.1016/S0007-6813(05)90037-0
   Google Scholar
• Peak, T., Toseland, R. W., & Banks, S. M. (2016). The impact of a spouse-caregiver support group on care recipient health care costs. Journal of Aging and Health, 7(3), 427–449. doi:10.1177/089826439500700306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, W., Frehill, L. M., & McNeely, C. L. (2015). Advancing women in science. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pistrang, N., Barker, C., & Humphreys, K. (2008). Mutual help groups for mental health problems: A review of effectiveness studies. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42(1–2), 110–121. doi:10.1007/s10464-008-9181-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purk, J. K. (2004). Support groups: Why do people attend? Rehabilitation Nursing, 29(2), 62–67. doi:10.1002/rnj.2004.29.issue-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quinlan, K. M. (1999). Enhancing mentoring and networking of junior academic women: What, why, and how? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 21(1), 31–42. doi:10.1080/1360080990210103
   Google Scholar
• Ragins, B. R., & Cotton, J. L. (1999). Mentor functions and outcomes: A comparison of men and women in formal and informal mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 529–550. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settles, I. H., Cortina, L. M., Buchanan, N. T., & Miner, K. (2013). Derogation, discrimination, and (dis)satisfaction with jobs in science: A gendered analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 179–191. doi:10.1177/0361684312468727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, B. R., Hawkins, R., McTavish, F., Pingree, S., & Gustafson, D. H. (2009). Effects of insightful disclosure within computer mediated support groups on women with breast cancer. Health Communication, 19(2), 133–142. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc19025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, R. Q. (2008). Advocating for social justice in academia through recruitment, retention, admissions, and professional survival. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 36(3), 180–191. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1912.2008.tb00081.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, N., Bystydzienski, J., & Desai, A. (2015). Changing institutional culture through peer mentoring of women STEM faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 40, 143–157. doi:10.1007/s10755-014-9300-9
   Google Scholar
• Tutty, L., Bidgood, B., & Rothery, M. (1993). Support groups for battered women: Research on their efficacy. Journal of Family Violence, 8(4), 325–343. doi:10.1007/BF00978097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). National population estimates: Characteristics. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/popest/national/asrh/NC-EST2005-asrh.html
   Google Scholar
• van der Houwen, K., Stroebe, M., Schut, H., Stroebe, W., & van den Bout, J. (2010). Online mutual support in bereavement: An empirical examination. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1519–1525. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Uden-kraan, C. F., Drossaert, C. H. C., Taal, E., Seydel, E. R., & van de Laar, M. A. F. J. (2009). Participation in online patient support groups endorses patients’ empowerment. Patient Education and Counseling, 74(1), 61–69. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilhauer, R. P. (2009). Perceived benefits of online support groups for women with metastatic breast cancer. Women and Health, 49(5), 381–404. doi:10.1080/03630240903239719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, M., & Younger, M. (2000). The other side of the gender gap. Gender and Education, 12(4), 493–508. doi:10.1080/09540250020004126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, M., & Higgins, A. (2016). Narratives of recovery from mental illness. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• White, M., & Dorman, S. M. (2001). Receiving social support online: Implications for health education. Health Education Research, 16(6), 693–707. doi:10.1093/her/16.6.693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zappert, L. T., & Stanbury, K. (1985). “In the pipeline”: A comparative analysis of men and women in science. Stanford, CA: Engineering and Medicine at Stanford University, Center for Research on Women Publications, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar