References
- Orton A. Students’ understanding of differentiation. Educ Stud Math. 1983;14:235–250.
- Rasmussen CL, King KD. Locating starting points in differential equations: a realistic mathematics education approach. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2000;31:161–172.
- Teuscher D, Reys R. Rate of change: AP calculus students’ understandings and misconceptions after completing different curricular paths. Sch Sci Math. 2012;112:359–376.
- Calculus AP. AB 2011 scoring guidance. Available from: http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/ap11_calculus_qa.pdf.
- Stewart J. Single variable calculus: concepts and contexts. Belmont, CA: Brookes/Cole; 2007.
- Finney R, Demana F, Waits B, Kennedy D. Calculus: graphical, numerical, algebraic. AP ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2007.
- Hughes-Hallett D, McCallum WG, Gleason AM, Pasquale A, Flath DE, Quinney D, Gordon G, Tecosky-Feldman J, Lomen O, Thrash JB, Lovelock D, Thrash KR. Calculus: single variable. Danvers, MA: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
- Rutherford F, Ahlgren A. Science for all Americans: project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.
- Cutnell JD, Johnson KW. Physics. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1998.
- Simpson G, Hoyles C, Noss R. Exploring the mathematics of motion through construction and collaboration. J Comput Assist Learn. 2006;22:114–136.
- PhET interactive simulations. Colorado: University of Colorado at Boulder. Available from: http://phet.colorado.edu/.
- Sokolowski A, Yalvac B, Loving C. Science modeling in pre-calculus: how to make mathematics problems contextually meaningful. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2011;42:283–297.
- Laird C. Webster's new world dictionary and thesaurus 2002. New York: Hungry Minds; 2002.
- Bleich L, Ledford S, Hawley C, Polly D, Orrill C. An analysis of the use of graphical representation in participants’ solutions. Math Educ. 2006;16:22–34.
- Staver JR, Bay M. Analysis of the project synthesis goal cluster orientation and inquiry emphasis of elementary science textbooks. Res Sci Teach. 1987;24:629–643.
- Alfieri L, Brooks PJ, Aldrich NJ, Tenenbaum HR. Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? J Educ Psychol. 2011;103:1–18.
- Joyce B, Weil M, Calhoun E. Models of teaching. 8th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2009.
- Prince M, Felder RM. Inductive teaching and learning methods: definitions, comparisons, and research bases. J Eng Educ. 2006;95:123–138.
- Oliver-Hoyo MD, Allen D, Anderson M. Inquiry-guided instruction. J Coll Sci Teach. 2004;33:20–24.
- Lesh R. Beyond constructivism: a new paradigm for identifying mathematical abilities that are most needed for success beyond school in a technology based age of information. In: Mitchelmore M, editor. Technology in mathematics learning and teaching: cognitive consideration. Melbourne: Australia Mathematics Education Research; 2001. p. 37–52.
- Sokolowski A, Rackley R. Teaching harmonic motion in trigonometry: inductive inquiry supported by physics simulations. Aust Sr Math J. 2011;24:45–53.
- Engelbrecht J, Bergsten C, Kågesten O. Conceptual and procedural approaches to mathematics in the engineering curriculum: student conceptions and performance. J Eng Educ. 2012;101:138–162.