Calculus limits involving infinity: the role of students’ informal dynamic reasoning

References

• Sierpinska A. Humanities students and epistemological obstacles related to limits. Educ Stud Math. 1987;18(4):371–397.
   Google Scholar
• Davis R, Vinner S. The notion of limit: some seemingly unavoidable misconception stages. J Math Behav. 1986;5(3):281–303.
   Google Scholar
• Ervynck G. Conceptual difficulties for first year university students in the acquisition of the notion of limit of a function. Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education; Grenoble: IGPME; 1981. p. 330–333.
   Google Scholar
• Williams SR. Models of limits in college calculus students. J Res Math Educ. 1991;22(3):219–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan J. Problems with the language of limits. Learn Math. 1991;11(3):20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Tall DO. The transition to advanced mathematical thinking: functions, limits, infinity, and proof. In: Grouws DA, editor. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1992. p. 495–511.
   Google Scholar
• Bezuidenhout J. Limits and continuity: some conceptions of first-year students. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2001;32(4):487–500.
   Google Scholar
• Cornu B. Limits. In: Tall D, editor. Advanced mathematical thinking. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991. p. 153–166.
   Google Scholar
• Tall DO, Vinner S. Concept image and concept definition in mathematics, with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educ Stud Math. 1981;12(2):151–169.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy N. Students’ perceptions of institutional practices: the case of limits of functions in college level calculus courses. Educ Stud Math. 2009;72(3):341–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oehrtman M. Collapsing dimensions, physical limitation, and other student metaphors for limit concepts. J Res Math Educ. 2009;40(4):396–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff G, Núñez RE. Where mathematics comes from: how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York, NY: Basic Books; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Williams SR. Predications of the limit concept: an application of repertory grids. J Res Math Educ. 2001;32(4):341–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinyard C. Reinventing the formal definition of limit: the case of Amy and Mike. J Math Behav. 2011;30(2):93–114.
   Google Scholar
• Swinyard C, Larsen S. Coming to understand the formal definition of limit: insights gained from engaging students in reinvention. J Res Math Educ. 2012;43(4):465–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oehrtman M. Layers of abstraction: theory and design for the instruction of limit concepts. In: Carlson M, Rasmussen C, editors. Making the connection: research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics education. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America; 2008. p. 65–80.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández E. The students take on the epsilon-delta definition of a limit. PRIMUS. 2004;14(1):43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Verzosa D, Guzon AF, de las Peñas ML. Using dynamic tools to develop an understanding of the fundamental ideas of calculus. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2014;45(2):190–199.
   Google Scholar
• Cottrill J, Dubinksy E, Nichols D, Schwingendorf K, Thomas K, Vidakovic D. Understanding the limit concept: beginning with a coordinated process scheme. J Math Behav. 1996;15(2):167–192.
   Google Scholar
• Mamona-Downs J. Letting the intuitive bear on the formal: a didactical approach for the understanding of the limit of a sequence. Educ Stud Math. 2001;48(2–3):259–288.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart J. Calculus: early transcendentals. 7th ed. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bressoud D, Carlson MP, Mesa V, Rasmussen C. The calculus student: insights from the Mathematical Association of America national study. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2013;44(5):685–698.
   Google Scholar
• Tall DO. Intuitions about infinity. Math Sch. 1981;10(3):30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Tall DO. Natural and formal infinities. Educ Stud Math. 2001;48(2–3):199–238.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan J. Young peoples’ ideas of infinity. Educ Stud Math. 2001;48(2–3):239–257.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein E. Tacit models and infinity. Educ Stud Math. 2001;48(2–3):309–329.
   Google Scholar
• Kolar VM, Čadež TH. Analysis of factors influencing the understanding of the concept of infinity. Educ Stud Math. 2012;80(3):389–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaput J. Mathematics and learning: roots of epistemological status. In: Lochhead J, Clement J, editors. Cognitive process instruction. Philadelphia, PA: Franklin Institute Press; 1979. p. 289–303.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein E, Tirosh D, Hess P. The intuition of infinity. Educ Stud Math. 1979;10(1):3–40.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson M. A cross-sectional investigation of the development of the function concept. In: Schoenfeld A, Kaput J, Dubinksy E, editors. Research in collegiate mathematics education III. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society; 1998. p. 114–162.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson M, Jacobs S, Coe E, Larsen S, Hsu E. Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: a framework and a study. J Res Math Educ. 2002;33(5):352–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harel G. DNR perspective on mathematics curriculum and instruction, part 1: focus on proving. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik. 2008;40(3):487–500.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin GA. Observing mathematical problem solving through task-based interviews. J Res Math Educ Monogr. 1997;9:40–62.
   Google Scholar
• Radford L. Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs: a semiotic-cultural approach to students’ types of generalizations. Math Thinking Learn. 2003;5(1):37–70.
   Google Scholar
• Arzarello F, Paola D, Robutti O, Sabena C. Gestures as semiotic resources in the mathematics classroom. Educ Stud Math. 2009;70(2):97–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen C, Stephan M, Allen K. Classroom mathematical practices and gesturing. J Math Behav. 2004;23(3):301–323.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan RC, Biklen SK. Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theories and methods. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Tall DO. Dynamic mathematics and the blending of knowledge structures in the calculus. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik. 2009;41:481–492.
   Google Scholar
• Dray T, Manogue CA. Bridging the gap between mathematics and the physical sciences. In: Smith D, Swanson E, editors. Preparing future science and mathematics teachers. Bozeman, MT: Montana State University; 2005. p. 39–41.
   Google Scholar
• Gainsburg J. The mathematical disposition of structural engineers. J Res Math Educ. 2007;38(5):477–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas GB, Weir MD, Hass J. Thomas’ calculus. 12th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes-Hallett D, Gleason AM, McCallum WG, Connally E, Flath DE, Kalaycioglu S, Lahme B, Lock PF, Lomen DO, Lovelock D, Lozano GI, Morris J, Mumford D, Osgood BG, Patterson CL, Quinney D, Rhea KR, Spiegler AH, Tecosky-Feldman J, Tucker T. Calculus: single and multivariable. 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2012.
   Google Scholar