‘Negative of my money, positive of her money’: secondary students’ ways of relating equations to a debt context

References

• Carpenter TP, Ansell E, Franke M, Fennema E, Weisbeck L. Models of problem solving: a study of kindergarten children's problem-solving processes. J Res Math Educ. 1993;24(5):428–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop JP, Lamb LL, Philipp RA, Whitacre I, Schappelle BP, Lewis ML. Obstacles and affordances for integer reasoning: an analysis of children's thinking and the history of mathematics. J Res Math Educ. 2014;45(1):19–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb LL, Bishop JP, Philipp RA, Schappelle BP, Whitacre I, Lewis M. Developing symbol sense for the minus sign. Math Teaching Middle School. 2012;18(1):5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter TP, Fennema E, Franke ML, Levi L, Empson SB. Children's mathematics: cognitively guided instruction. Portsmouth (NH): Heinemann; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Fuson KC, Smith ST, Lo Cicero AM. Supporting Latino first graders’ ten-structured thinking in urban classrooms. J Res Math Educ. 1997;28(6):738–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffe LP. (1994). Children's multiplying schemes. In: Harel G, Confrey J, editors. The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics. Albany (NY): State University of New York Press. p. 3–40
   Google Scholar
• Steffe LP. A new hypothesis concerning children's fractional knowledge. J Math Behav. 2002;20(3):267–307.
   Google Scholar
• Steffe LP, Olive J. Children's fractional knowledge. New York (NY): Springer; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter TP, Franke ML, Levi L. Thinking mathematically: integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth (NH): Heinemann; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Empson SB, Levi L. Extending children's mathematics: fractions and decimals. Portsmouth (NH): Heinemann; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno A, Martinón A. The teaching of numerical extensions: the case of negative numbers. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 1999;30:789–809.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein E. The practicality of intuitive meanings, analysis of an example: the negative numbers. In: Intuition in science and mathematics: an educational approach. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Gallardo A. The extension of the natural-number domain to the integers in the transition from arithmetic to algebra. Educ Stud Math. 2002;49:171–192.
   Google Scholar
• Henley AT. The history of negative numbers [unpublished dissertation]. London: South Bank University; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Hefendehl-Hebeker L. Negative numbers: obstacles in their evolution from intuitive to intellectual constructs. Learn Math. 1991;11:26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Thomaidis Y, Tzanakis C. The notion of historical “parallelism” revisited: historical evolution and students’ conception of the order relation on the number line. Educ Stud Math. 2007;66:165–183.
   Google Scholar
• Vlassis J. The role of mathematical symbols in the development of number conceptualization: the case of the minus sign. Philos Psychol. 2008;21(4):555–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudenthal H. Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Boston (MA): D. Reidel; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Janvier C. The understanding of directed number. In: Bergeron JC, Herscovics N, editors. Vol. 2, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Montreal; 1983. p. 295–301.
   Google Scholar
• Linchevski L, Williams J. Using intuition from everyday life in “filling” the gap in children's extension of their number concept to include the negative numbers. Educ Stud Math. 1999; 39(1–3):131–147.
   Google Scholar
• Streefland L. Negative numbers: reflections of a learning researcher. J Math Behav. 1996;15(1):57–77.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson PW, Dreyfus T. Integers as transformations. J Res Math Educ. 1988;19(2):115–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altiparmak K, Özdogan E. A study on the teaching of the concept of negative numbers. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2009;41:31–47.
   Google Scholar
• Liebeck P. Scores and forfeits – an intuitive model for integer arithmetic. Educ Stud Math. 1990;21:221–239.
   Google Scholar
• Behrend JL, Mohs LC. From simple questions to powerful connections: a two-year conversation about negative numbers. Teach Child Math. 2006;12:260–264.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan M, Akyuz D. A proposed instructional theory for integer addition and subtraction. J Res Math Educ. 2012;43(4):428–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick J, Swafford J, Findell B. Developing proficiency with other numbers. In: Kilpatrick J, Swafford J, Findell B, editors. Adding it up: helping children learn mathematics. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 2001. p. 231–254
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council, editor. Adding it up: helping children learn mathematics. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Vlassis J. The balance model: hindrance or support for the solving of linear equations with one unknown. Educ Stud Math. 2002;49:341–359.
   Google Scholar
• Christou KP, Vosniadou S. What kinds of numbers do students assign to literal symbols? Aspects of the transition from arithmetic to algebra. Math Think Learn. 2012;14(1):1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu MM. Using metaphors to understand and solve arithmetic problems: novices and experts working with negative numbers. Math Think Learn. 2001;3(2–3):93–124.
   Google Scholar
• Peled I, Carraher D. Signed numbers and algebraic thinking. In: Kaput JJ, Carraher DW, Blanton ML, editors. Algebra in the early grades. NCTM. New York (NY): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2008. p. 303–328.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington (DC): National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers; 2010. Available from: http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Content/6/NS
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. Secondary mathematics syllabuses. Singapore: Curriculum Planning and Development Division, Ministry of Education; 2006. Available from: http://www.moe.gov. sg/education/syllabuses/sciences/files/maths-secondary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Isoda M. Junior high school teaching guide for the Japanese course of study: mathematics (grade 7–9). CRICED, Tsukuba (Japan): University of Tsukuba; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Whitacre I, Bishop JP, Lamb LLC, Philipp RA, Schappelle BP, Lewis M. Integers: History, textbook approaches, and children' productive mathematical intuitions. In: Wiest LR, Lamberg T, editors. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 913–920). Reno (NV): University of Reno; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Burger EB, Bennett JM, Chard DJ, Jackson AL, Kennedy PA. California mathematics course 1: numbers to algebra. Austin (TX): Holt, Rinehart, & Winston; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Whitacre I, Bishop JP, Philipp RA, Lamb LL, Schappelle BP. Dollars and sense: students' integer perspectives. Math Teaching Middle School. 2014;20(2): 84–89.
   Google Scholar