Formative questioning in computer learning environments: a course for pre-service mathematics teachers

References

• Koehler MJ, Mishra P. Introducing TPCK. In: AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology, editor. Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. New York (NY): Routledge; 2008. p. 3–29.
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Technology in Education. National educational technology standards for teachers. Eugene; 2000. Available from: http://cnets.iste.org
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Principle and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Baki A. Preparing student teachers to use computers in mathematics classrooms through a long-term preservice course in Turkey. J Inf Technol Teach Educ. 2000;9(3):343–362.
   Google Scholar
• Duhaney DC. Teacher education: preparing teachers to integrate technology. Int J Instructional Media. 2001;28(1):23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Wetzel K, Zambo R. Innovations in integrating technology into student teaching experiences. J Res Comput Educ. 1996;29(2):196–215.
   Google Scholar
• Niess ML. Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching Teach Educ. 2005;21:509–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson M. Technology practice as a function of pedagogical expertise [Doctoral dissertation]. Arizona (AZ): Arizona State University; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkwood A. E‐learning: you don't always get what you hope for. Technol Pedagogy Educ. 2009;18(2):107–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce R, Stacey K. A framework for monitoring progress and planning teaching towards the effective use of computer algebra systems. Int J Comput Math Learn. 2004;9:59–93.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman LS. Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educ Res. 1986;15:4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra P, Koehler MJ. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teach Coll Rec. 2006;108(6):1017–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkoç H. Pre-service mathematics teachers' practice of questioning in computer learning environments. In: B Ubuz, Ç Haser, MA Mariotti, editors. Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education; 2013 Feb 6–10; Antalya (Turkey): ODTÜ; 2013. p. 2514–2523.
   Google Scholar
• de Lange J. Framework for classroom assessment in mathematics. 1999. Available from: http://www.fisme.science.uu.nl/catch/products/framework/de_lange_frameworkfinal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Heritage M. What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan. 2007;89(2):140–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer CA. Assessment and classroom learning: theory and practice. Assess Educ. 1998;5(1):131–137.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom BS, Hastings JT, Madus GF, editors. Handbook on the formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Gronlund N. Assessment of student achievement. 8th ed. Boston (MA): Pearson; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Black P, Wiliam D. In praise of educational research: formative assessment. Br Educ Res J. 2003;29(5):623–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volante L, Fazio X. Exploring teacher candidates' assessment literacy: implications for teacher education reform and professional development. Can J Educ. 2007;30(3):749–770.
   Google Scholar
• Mavrommatis Y. Understanding assessment in the classroom: phases of the assessment process – the assessment episode. Assess Educ. 1997;4(3):381–400.
   Google Scholar
• Martino AM, Maher CA. Teacher questioning to promote justification and generalization in mathematics: what research practice has taught us. J Math Behav. 1999;18(1):53–78.
   Google Scholar
• Leahy S, Lyon C, Thompson M, Wiliam D. Classroom assessment, minute by minute, day by day. Educ Leadersh. 2005;63(3):19–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl R. Assessment of Inquiry. In: Atkin M, Coffey JE, editors. Everyday assessment in the science classroom. Arlington (VA): NSTA Press; 2003. p. 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• Sato M. Working with teachers in assessment-related professional development. In: JM Atkin, JE Coffey, editors. Everyday assessment in the science classroom. Arlington (VA): NSTA Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Airasian PW, Jones A. The teacher as applied measurer: realities of classroom measurement and assessment. Appl Meas Educ. 1993;6(3):241–254.
   Google Scholar
• Weiland IS, Hudson RA, Amador JM. Preservice formative assessment interviews: the development of competent questioning. Int J Sci Math Educ. 2014;12:329–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Feldman A, Beatty ID. Factors that affect science and mathematics teachers' initial implementation of technology-enhanced formative assessment using a classroom response system. J Sci Educ Technol. 2012;21:523–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roschelle J, Rafanan K, Bhanot R, Estrella G, Penuel B, Nussbaum M, Claro S. Scaffolding group explanation and feedback with handheld technology: impact on students' mathematics learning. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2010;58:399–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell M, O'Dwyer LM, Miranda H. Diagnosing students' misconceptions in algebra: results from an experimental pilot study. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(2):414–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang TH. What strategies are effective for formative assessment in an e-learning environment? J Comput Assisted Learn. 2007;23(3):171–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CY, Chen MP. A computer game as a context for non-routine mathematical problem solving: the effects of type of question prompt and level of prior knowledge. Comput Educ. 2009;52(3):530–542.
   Google Scholar
• Noss R, Hoyles C. Windows on mathematical meanings: learning cultures and computers. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg M. Creating software applications for children: some thoughts about design. In: A diSessa, C Hoyles, R Noss, editors. Computers and exploratory learning. Berlin: NATO; 1995. p. 175–196.
   Google Scholar
• Drijvers P, Doorman M, Boon P, Van Gisbergen S. Instrumental orchestration: theory and practice. In: V Durand-Guerrier, S Soury-Lavergne, F Arzarello, editors. Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education; 2009 Jan 28–Feb 1; Lyon (France): INRP; 2010. p. 1349–1358.
   Google Scholar
• Taba H. Curriculum development: theory and practice. New York (NY): Harcourt, Brace & World; 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Wragg EC, Brown G. Questioning in the primary school. London: Routledge Falmer; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lee Y, Kinzie MB. Teacher questioning and student responses with regard to cognition and language use. Instructional Sc. 2012;40:857–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brualdi AC. Classroom questions. Practical as assessment. Res Eval. 1998;6(6). Available from: http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=6&n=6
   Google Scholar